Re: 5.2.1-R == CURRENT????

2004-03-13 Thread Mark Ovens
Mark Ovens wrote: I'll try pulling a new tree using CVSup instead. That did the trick; I zapped src/ and ports/ and started again with CVSup (pulling the trees directly, prefix=/usr, rather than via a local repository). Thanks again. Regards, Mark Thanks for your help guys. Regards, Mark

Re: 5.2.1-R == CURRENT????

2004-03-13 Thread Mark Ovens
Loren M. Lang wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:00:38AM +, Mark Ovens wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:51:48PM +, Mark Ovens wrote: Surely not? I was advised that a problem I'm experiencing is fixed in -current. I just updated my source tree to -current with ''cvs co

Re: 5.2.1-R == CURRENT????

2004-03-13 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:00:38AM +, Mark Ovens wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:51:48PM +, Mark Ovens wrote: > >>Surely not? I was advised that a problem I'm experiencing is fixed in > >>-current. I just updated my source tree to -current with ''cvs co src/''

Re: 5.2.1-R == CURRENT????

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Ovens
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:51:48PM +, Mark Ovens wrote: Surely not? I was advised that a problem I'm experiencing is fixed in -current. I just updated my source tree to -current with ''cvs co src/'' but no files have been updated :-/ Did you cvsup your CVS repository firs

Re: 5.2.1-R == CURRENT????

2004-03-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:51:48PM +, Mark Ovens wrote: > Surely not? I was advised that a problem I'm experiencing is fixed in > -current. I just updated my source tree to -current with ''cvs co src/'' > but no files have been updated :-/ Did you cvsup your CVS repository first? Kris pgp