On 8 October 2013, at 16:40, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705:
>> hastctl(8)'s `status'
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I tried downloading the src with:
>
> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>
> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>
> 20130705:
> hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to
Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> The Thick Plottens…
>>> I received the drives and installed them on a working system. The
>>> failed system is structured with a single partition for the system and
>>> another for swap. For some unknown reason, the BIOS got left
>>> configured to boot the extra disk if its
On 8 October 2013, at 06:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug
On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wr
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fr
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >> The exact sequence was:
> >>
> >> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
> >
> > Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.c
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> The exact sequence was:
>>
>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
>
> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
> is definitely part of what should be updated?
System i
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> The exact sequence was:
>
> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
is definitely part of what should be updated?
> Step 2: make buildworld
> Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=LA
On 4 October 2013, at 09:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am
On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses
a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>> However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPD
On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>>
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been
upd
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
> kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
> noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
> says:
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the buildwo
19 matches
Mail list logo