Re: ATI RAGE Mobility [9700]

2005-04-03 Thread Roland Smith
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:08:34AM +0100, - wrote:
 Any way to get an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 working with 3D acceleration ?

No. Ati only supplies windows and Linux drivers. The open source drivers
in xorg only support up to the Radeon 9250.

But see
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-January/017723.html

Roland
-- 
R.F. Smith   /\ASCII Ribbon Campaign
r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l  \ /No HTML/RTF in e-mail
http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in e-mail
public key: http://www.keyserver.net / \Respect for open standards


pgpQ7qhyMBkDG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ATI RAGE Mobility [9700]

2005-04-02 Thread -
Any way to get an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 working with 3D acceleration ?
Andrew Heyn wrote:
I would like to state that at one point, I did get this to work.
This was also a long time ago, when the patches mentioned
in some of the proceeding links had to be done.. (which were and probably
still are XFree86 specific)
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html
http://am-productions.biz/docs/fujitsu-p2110.php leads to
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building
I noticed that I had to make sure I rebuilt mach64.ko and some of the X
libraries regarding dri
if I was to upgrade the kernel.
Note this from the Wiki:
The DRM is shipped with the kernel, so you shouldn't need to build it. If
you choose to, simply run make  make install from the drm/bsd directory.

This is contrary to the suggestion to install ports/graphics/drm.  The
building referred
to above is within the X tree.
The history to the mach64 dri support may be of interest:
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html (already gave this link)
You can always (if you are patient) contact anholt who is rather busy on
freenode.net in
#dri.  Beware, I asked a question there, and fixed it myself before I got an
answer.
Hope this helps more than my other post.
It still sucked pretty bad once I got DRI working with my mach64, but...
It was better...
Thanks!
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Busby
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:23 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: re: ATI RAGE Mobility
On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote:
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote:
   

I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI
Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard.  I succesfully
installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in 
 

my dmesg:
 

drm0: Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2X port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
0xf420-0xf4200fff,0xf500-0xf5ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on
pci1
info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0
However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about
DRM in the logfiles (attached).  glxinfo reports it doesn't use
Direct Rendering as well.
Attached is my xorg.conf, as well.
My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on
this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work?
 



from kernel LINT file
# DRM options:
# mgadrm:AGP Matrox G200, G400, G450, G550
# tdfxdrm:   3dfx Voodoo 3/4/5 and Banshee
# r128drm:   ATI Rage 128
# radeondrm: ATI Radeon up to 9000/9100
# DRM_DEBUG: include debug printfs, very slow
#
# mga requires AGP in the kernel, and it is recommended
# for AGP r128 and radeon cards.
device  mgadrm
device  r128drm
device  radeondrm
device  tdfxdrm
options DRM_DEBUG
You may need to add the
device mgadrm
Hope it helps.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATI Rage Mobility

2005-03-29 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote:
 On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote:
  I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI
  Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard.  I succesfully
  installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in
  my dmesg:
 
  drm0: Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2X port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
  0xf420-0xf4200fff,0xf500-0xf5ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on
  pci1
  info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
  info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0
 
  However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about
  DRM in the logfiles (attached).  glxinfo reports it doesn't use
  Direct Rendering as well.
 
  Attached is my xorg.conf, as well.
 
  My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on
  this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work?

A frequent mistake is that people forget to install the DRI drivers. So, 
did you install /usr/ports/graphics/dri?

 Damn, forgot the attachments (common problem of mine, I'm afraid...)

xorg's log would be nice too.

tijl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATI Rage Mobility

2005-03-29 Thread Edwin Mons
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:27:15 +0200, Tijl Coosemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 xorg's log would be nice too.

Try #3, this time as an URL to the logs:  http://edwinm.ik.nu/Xorg.0.log

Cheers,
Edwin Mons
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


re: ATI RAGE Mobility

2005-03-29 Thread Mark Busby
On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote:
 On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote:
  I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI
  Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard.  I succesfully
  installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in  my 
  dmesg:
 
  drm0: Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2X port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
  0xf420-0xf4200fff,0xf500-0xf5ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on
  pci1
  info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
  info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0
 
  However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about
  DRM in the logfiles (attached).  glxinfo reports it doesn't use
  Direct Rendering as well.
 
  Attached is my xorg.conf, as well.
 
  My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on
  this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work?


 
 
from kernel LINT file
# DRM options:
# mgadrm:AGP Matrox G200, G400, G450, G550
# tdfxdrm:   3dfx Voodoo 3/4/5 and Banshee
# r128drm:   ATI Rage 128
# radeondrm: ATI Radeon up to 9000/9100
# DRM_DEBUG: include debug printfs, very slow
#
# mga requires AGP in the kernel, and it is recommended
# for AGP r128 and radeon cards.
device  mgadrm
device  r128drm
device  radeondrm
device  tdfxdrm
options DRM_DEBUG

You may need to add the 
device mgadrm
Hope it helps. 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: ATI RAGE Mobility

2005-03-29 Thread Andrew Heyn
Sorry,

Rage mobility is mach64... you're trying to use a rage128/radeon driver.
That won't work.  There is some preliminary mach64 support but you have
to build it yourself.  It really sucks, it's not so worth it.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Busby
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:23 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: re: ATI RAGE Mobility


On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote:
 On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote:
  I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI
  Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard.  I succesfully
  installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in 
my dmesg:
 
  drm0: Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2X port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
  0xf420-0xf4200fff,0xf500-0xf5ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on
  pci1
  info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
  info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0
 
  However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about
  DRM in the logfiles (attached).  glxinfo reports it doesn't use
  Direct Rendering as well.
 
  Attached is my xorg.conf, as well.
 
  My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on
  this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work?




from kernel LINT file
# DRM options:
# mgadrm:AGP Matrox G200, G400, G450, G550
# tdfxdrm:   3dfx Voodoo 3/4/5 and Banshee
# r128drm:   ATI Rage 128
# radeondrm: ATI Radeon up to 9000/9100
# DRM_DEBUG: include debug printfs, very slow
#
# mga requires AGP in the kernel, and it is recommended
# for AGP r128 and radeon cards.
device  mgadrm
device  r128drm
device  radeondrm
device  tdfxdrm
options DRM_DEBUG

You may need to add the
device mgadrm
Hope it helps.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATI RAGE Mobility

2005-03-29 Thread Edwin Mons
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:28:19 -0800, Andrew Heyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sorry,
 
 Rage mobility is mach64... you're trying to use a rage128/radeon driver.
 That won't work.  There is some preliminary mach64 support but you have
 to build it yourself.  It really sucks, it's not so worth it.

I built it myself, but it ain't working...

Edwinm
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: ATI RAGE Mobility

2005-03-29 Thread Andrew Heyn
I would like to state that at one point, I did get this to work.
This was also a long time ago, when the patches mentioned
in some of the proceeding links had to be done.. (which were and probably
still are XFree86 specific)

http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html
http://am-productions.biz/docs/fujitsu-p2110.php leads to
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building

I noticed that I had to make sure I rebuilt mach64.ko and some of the X
libraries regarding dri
if I was to upgrade the kernel.

Note this from the Wiki:
The DRM is shipped with the kernel, so you shouldn't need to build it. If
you choose to, simply run make  make install from the drm/bsd directory.

This is contrary to the suggestion to install ports/graphics/drm.  The
building referred
to above is within the X tree.

The history to the mach64 dri support may be of interest:
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html (already gave this link)

You can always (if you are patient) contact anholt who is rather busy on
freenode.net in
#dri.  Beware, I asked a question there, and fixed it myself before I got an
answer.

Hope this helps more than my other post.
It still sucked pretty bad once I got DRI working with my mach64, but...
It was better...

Thanks!
Andrew


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Busby
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:23 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: re: ATI RAGE Mobility


On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote:
 On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote:
  I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI
  Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard.  I succesfully
  installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in 
my dmesg:
 
  drm0: Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2X port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
  0xf420-0xf4200fff,0xf500-0xf5ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on
  pci1
  info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
  info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0
 
  However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about
  DRM in the logfiles (attached).  glxinfo reports it doesn't use
  Direct Rendering as well.
 
  Attached is my xorg.conf, as well.
 
  My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on
  this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work?




from kernel LINT file
# DRM options:
# mgadrm:AGP Matrox G200, G400, G450, G550
# tdfxdrm:   3dfx Voodoo 3/4/5 and Banshee
# r128drm:   ATI Rage 128
# radeondrm: ATI Radeon up to 9000/9100
# DRM_DEBUG: include debug printfs, very slow
#
# mga requires AGP in the kernel, and it is recommended
# for AGP r128 and radeon cards.
device  mgadrm
device  r128drm
device  radeondrm
device  tdfxdrm
options DRM_DEBUG

You may need to add the
device mgadrm
Hope it helps.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ATI Rage Mobility

2005-03-28 Thread Edwin Mons
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi.
 
 I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI
 Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard.  I succesfully installed
 the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in my dmesg:
 
 drm0: Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2X port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
 0xf420-0xf4200fff,0xf500-0xf5ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on
 pci1
 info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
 info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0
 
 However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about DRM
 in the logfiles (attached).  glxinfo reports it doesn't use Direct
 Rendering as well.
 
 Attached is my xorg.conf, as well.
 
 My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on
 this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work?

Damn, forgot the attachments (common problem of mine, I'm afraid...)

Cheers,
Edwin Mons


xorg.conf
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]