RE: Bandwidth hit in natd/ipfw on 4.4-RELEASE

2004-04-03 Thread Mark Weisman
My first question to help is why do you have any firewall at all? firewall_type=OPEN Typically means that you have no ports being blocked? I'm hoping this is just for testing purposes? I see in your natd.conf file you have a line for unregistered_only=YES. This switch is for alteration of

Re: Bandwidth hit in natd/ipfw on 4.4-RELEASE

2004-03-26 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:43:56AM -0400, Matt Coe, CCNA typed: > Ruben de Groot wrote: > > >4.4-RELEASE is quite old. Have you considered the possibility that you > >got rooted? > > > > > I'm sure it's /possible/, but extraordinarily unlikely. The server's > only been three days and I'm on a un

Re: Bandwidth hit in natd/ipfw on 4.4-RELEASE

2004-03-26 Thread Matt Coe, CCNA
Ruben de Groot wrote: 4.4-RELEASE is quite old. Have you considered the possibility that you got rooted? I'm sure it's /possible/, but extraordinarily unlikely. The server's only been three days and I'm on a university resnet; I'd guess that no port below 1024 is accessible from outside my ho

Re: Bandwidth hit in natd/ipfw on 4.4-RELEASE

2004-03-26 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:24:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Hey, I just my got NAT box running 4.4-RELEASE on an old Pentium 90 and > I'm experiencing a number of problems and I think they're related.. > there's been a major bandwidth hit in all my web surfing and my ICQ, AOL and MSN >