In response to Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * On 20/09/06 11:16 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> | In response to Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> |
> | [snip]
> |
> | > The scenario:
> | >
> | > I am running a FreeBSD 5.x box with IPFilter/IPNAT. The box has two
> | > interf
* On 20/09/06 17:16 +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
| Odhiambo Washington wrote:
|
| >I need to control bandwidth on the external interface only, not on the
| >LAN (internal interfaces).
| >
| >Is this rightful thinking or sheer imagination which is not practical?
|
| If you're happy with IPFilter an
* On 20/09/06 11:16 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
|
| [snip]
|
| > The scenario:
| >
| > I am running a FreeBSD 5.x box with IPFilter/IPNAT. The box has two
| > interfaces at the moment, external interface connected to the hostile
| > Interne
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I need to control bandwidth on the external interface only, not on the
LAN (internal interfaces).
Is this rightful thinking or sheer imagination which is not practical?
If you're happy with IPFilter and need to ensure minimum bandwidth for
some network segment, tak
In response to Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> The scenario:
>
> I am running a FreeBSD 5.x box with IPFilter/IPNAT. The box has two
> interfaces at the moment, external interface connected to the hostile
> Internet and internal interface connected to a switch for the LAN.
>