>Graham, please include the list in the reply - it doesn't help anyone else to
>have a private chat :)
Sorry about that
>> I didnt keep a list but mplayers extra codecs spring to mind.
>hmmm my mplayer and mplayer-skins having a nit with some skin it cant find
>(it may be that I chose a bun
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:34:10 +
Graham Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graham, please include the list in the reply - it doesn't help anyone else to
have a private chat :)
> I didnt keep a list but mplayers extra codecs spring to mind.
hmmm my mplayer and mplayer-skin s having a nit with
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:04:06 -
"Graham Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed that quite alot of ports are broken on 6.2
> but then again I only loaded it a few days ago and havent
> updated the tree (thinking this is the 'latest' version - flawed?)
Mind explaining the problems
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:30:58AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Rachel Florentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >105Hi;
> >Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all
> >that the qmail port is junk. What about ezmlm?
> >Same thing? Or good to go?
>
> Didn't you know that /usr
Can you expand on this ?
I have noticed that quite alot of ports are broken on 6.2
but then again I only loaded it a few days ago and havent
updated the tree (thinking this is the 'latest' version - flawed?)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
On 11/22/06, Rachel Florentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
105Hi;
Okay, I learned from sad experience and you all
that the qmail port is junk. What about ezmlm?
Same thing? Or good to go?
Didn't you know that /usr/ports is a big pile of
junk? The problem is, we can't live without it.
___
