Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-13 Thread John Nielsen
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 08:53, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 6/12/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating > > system I've ever used... > > > > Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x > > > > -Jim > > What do you mean 5

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-13 Thread Danial Thom
--- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 12 June 2006 16:06, Danial Thom > wrote: > > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, > > > > > > Danial Thom wrote: > > > > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) > > > > > > At this point FreeBSD 6.

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-13 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 6/12/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating system I've ever used... Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x -Jim What do you mean 5.x? FreeBSD never made 5.x. They went straight from 4 to 6 like everybody els

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-13 Thread Jim Stapleton
Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating system I've ever used... Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x -Jim On 6/12/06, Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) --- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found this on Netcraft a

RE: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:06 PM >To: Kris Kennaway >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Beech Rintoul >Subject: Re: FreeBSD is #1 > > > > >--- Kri

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Sergio Lenzi
> While trying to introduce FreeBSD into a Micro$oft only house, I've heard the > following many times: > > "Never heard of FreeBSD" and "Show me some documentation and stats". > > Regardless of the actual version, the stats are accurate for those providers. > They reflect overall uptime and

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Danial Thom wrote: --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more intensive stress testing and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 12 June 2006 16:06, Danial Thom wrote: > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, > > > > Danial Thom wrote: > > > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) > > > > At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more > > intensive stress testing > > and QA by the pr

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Danial Thom
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, > Danial Thom wrote: > > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) > > At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more > intensive stress testing > and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is > stable. > > Kris > I'm not saying

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 12 June 2006 13:36, Danial Thom wrote: > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) > > --- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share > > it: > > > > Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in > > May. > > > > Six hosting companies share the top spot

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more intensive stress testing and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is stable. Kris pgp3Ibgo80nS3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: FreeBSD is #1

2006-06-12 Thread Danial Thom
Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) --- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share > it: > > Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in > May. > > Six hosting companies share the top spot this > month, with INetU, Hostway, > IPower, New York Internet, Pair