On Tuesday 13 June 2006 08:53, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating
> > system I've ever used...
> >
> > Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x
> >
> > -Jim
>
> What do you mean 5
--- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 12 June 2006 16:06, Danial Thom
> wrote:
> > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700,
> > >
> > > Danial Thom wrote:
> > > > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
> > >
> > > At this point FreeBSD 6.
On 6/12/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating
system I've ever used...
Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x
-Jim
What do you mean 5.x? FreeBSD never made 5.x. They went straight from
4 to 6 like everybody els
Heh, FreeBSD is #1 to me because it is the most painless operating
system I've ever used...
Ignoring the 5.x installer. Never used pre-5.x
-Jim
On 6/12/06, Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
--- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I found this on Netcraft a
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:06 PM
>To: Kris Kennaway
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Beech Rintoul
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD is #1
>
>
>
>
>--- Kri
> While trying to introduce FreeBSD into a Micro$oft only house, I've heard the
> following many times:
>
> "Never heard of FreeBSD" and "Show me some documentation and stats".
>
> Regardless of the actual version, the stats are accurate for those providers.
> They reflect overall uptime and
On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Danial Thom wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700,
Danial Thom wrote:
Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more
intensive stress testing
and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is
On Monday 12 June 2006 16:06, Danial Thom wrote:
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700,
> >
> > Danial Thom wrote:
> > > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
> >
> > At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more
> > intensive stress testing
> > and QA by the pr
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700,
> Danial Thom wrote:
> > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
>
> At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more
> intensive stress testing
> and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is
> stable.
>
> Kris
>
I'm not saying
On Monday 12 June 2006 13:36, Danial Thom wrote:
> Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
>
> --- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share
> > it:
> >
> > Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in
> > May.
> >
> > Six hosting companies share the top spot
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Danial Thom wrote:
> Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more intensive stress testing
and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is stable.
Kris
pgp3Ibgo80nS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
--- Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I found this on Netcraft and thought I'd share
> it:
>
> Six Hosting Companies Most Reliable Hoster in
> May.
>
> Six hosting companies share the top spot this
> month, with INetU, Hostway,
> IPower, New York Internet, Pair
12 matches
Mail list logo