In the last episode (Aug 18), Sean M. said:
With GCC 3.4.4, what are the best CFLAGS to use for an AMD Duron ~1000
MHz? By best I mean creating the fastest programs that exploit fully
all of the architecture's features, without creating a noticible
increase in size. To date I've been using
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:10:57AM -0700, Sean M. wrote:
With GCC 3.4.4, what are the best CFLAGS to use for an AMD Duron ~1000
MHz? By best I mean creating the fastest programs that exploit fully
all of the architecture's features, without creating a noticible
increase in size. To date I've
Sean M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With GCC 3.4.4, what are the best CFLAGS to use for an AMD Duron ~1000
MHz? By best I mean creating the fastest programs that exploit fully
all of the architecture's features, without creating a noticible
increase in size. To date I've been using
On 8/18/06, Sean M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With GCC 3.4.4, what are the best CFLAGS to use for an AMD Duron ~1000
MHz? By best I mean creating the fastest programs that exploit fully
all of the architecture's features, without creating a noticible
increase in size. To date I've been using
--- Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The default is -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe.
info gcc --index optimize options says the default is '-O0'.
You said you don't want an increase in size. But that's
exactly what -O3 (via inlining) and -funroll-loops do.
If you want not to increase
On 8/18/06, Sean M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The default is -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe.
info gcc --index optimize options says the default is '-O0'.
That's true for stock GCC but FreeBSD (6.x) CFLAGS, COPTFLAGS, and
CXXFLAGS defaults to -O2