Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-20 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
== Polytropon wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 14:22:45 +0200 == > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > I always keep saying the ideal > > situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own > > really mission critical software and freely mix that with installin

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-20 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > I always keep saying the ideal > situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own > really mission critical software and freely mix that with installing > pre-compiled packages of anything else from the public reposito

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 20/08/2012 04:07, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> "Polytropon" == Polytropon writes: > > > Polytropon> I just assume providing packages for every imaginable > Polytropon> combination requires lots of resources. As an example > Polytropon> take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integr

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Polytropon" == Polytropon writes: Polytropon> I just assume providing packages for every imaginable Polytropon> combination requires lots of resources. As an example Polytropon> take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integration Polytropon> with KDE, Gnome, or none of them, and pr

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread Gary Kline
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:27:54PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:27:54 +0200 > From: Polytropon > Subject: Re: I Can Has Packages? > To: vermaden > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) >

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:54:52 +0200, vermaden wrote: > "Polytropon" : > > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote: > > > HI, > > > > > > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even > > > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide > > > package for LAME the same way as Ope

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread vermaden
... I even got a screenshot of how these *flavours* and *subpackages* work, here: http://ompldr.org/vZjV2bQ "Polytropon" pisze: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote: > > HI, > > > > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even > > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread vermaden
Hai ;) "Polytropon" : > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote: > > HI, > > > > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even > > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide > > package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does? > > j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^= > > Packages

Re: I Can Has Packages?

2012-08-19 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote: > HI, > > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide > package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does? j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^= Packages for _everything_ is impossible because of th