On 10/30/06, Andy Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/30/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andy Greenwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> top-posted:
>
> > On 10/28/06, David Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> IPFW seems to be the same IPFW that is used on MacOSX,
On 10/30/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Andy Greenwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> top-posted:
> On 10/28/06, David Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> IPFW seems to be the same IPFW that is used on MacOSX, so it seems to
>> make sense to learn and lean on IPFW when using
"Andy Greenwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> top-posted:
> On 10/28/06, David Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> IPFW seems to be the same IPFW that is used on MacOSX, so it seems to
>> make sense to learn and lean on IPFW when using in a mixed Machine
>> Environment. On the other side, ma
PF, for two reasons. Firstly, because I don't have to mess with
arbitrary rule numbers; I can just scroll down the page and know that
rules will be executed in that order. Secondly becuase I can easily
integrate bruteforceblocker.
On 10/28/06, David Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
IPF