Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache?
On Tue 12 Dec 2006 00:14, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > check out the post install instructions for ccache and verify on > your system. once you do that, it should work without issue. the > ccache stuff has to be listed first in your path for it to work > properly as far as i know. > > Good luck! After re-checking, `CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin' actually shows up before the `PATH' variable. Sorry for my previously misleading reply. Regards, -- Zhongtao ZhuTel: 86 10 62796829 Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache?
Zhongtao Zhu wrote: On Mon 11 Dec 2006 23:46, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ccache has worked for me wonderfully on 3+ machines doing everything: ports, buildworld, kernels, etc. No issues at all does the ccache stuff show up first in your path statement? Nope! By wild guess did I point to 'ccache' and anyway the problem was solved, though. I also use the phenomenal 'ccache' all the time except this one. It's probably the 'ccache' isn't the scapegoat, maybe there's some other unsuitable setup in my system. I don't know whether or not I'm able to get it located. Thank you, Eric. Regards, check out the post install instructions for ccache and verify on your system. once you do that, it should work without issue. the ccache stuff has to be listed first in your path for it to work properly as far as i know. Good luck! Eric ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache?
On Mon 11 Dec 2006 23:46, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Zhongtao Zhu wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I just got the 6.1-release stable src-tree merrily cvsup-ed, but it's >> weird the job of `make buildworld' stopped with some "missing error" >> related to the 'kvm'. (Forgive me, I can only offer this brief right >> now.) >> >> I've settled this problem with disabling the 'ccache' by purging its >> configuration lines from '/etc/make.conf' and afterwards everything is >> fixed. I wonder if somebody else also encountered with this frustrated >> combination. > ccache has worked for me wonderfully on 3+ machines doing everything: > ports, buildworld, kernels, etc. No issues at all > > does the ccache stuff show up first in your path statement? Nope! By wild guess did I point to 'ccache' and anyway the problem was solved, though. I also use the phenomenal 'ccache' all the time except this one. It's probably the 'ccache' isn't the scapegoat, maybe there's some other unsuitable setup in my system. I don't know whether or not I'm able to get it located. Thank you, Eric. Regards, -- Zhongtao ZhuTel: 86 10 62796829 Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Is it safe to `make buildworld' while using ccache?
Zhongtao Zhu wrote: Dear list, I just got the 6.1-release stable src-tree merrily cvsup-ed, but it's weird the job of `make buildworld' stopped with some "missing error" related to the 'kvm'. (Forgive me, I can only offer this brief right now.) I've settled this problem with disabling the 'ccache' by purging its configuration lines from '/etc/make.conf' and afterwards everything is fixed. I wonder if somebody else also encountered with this frustrated combination. Regards, ccache has worked for me wonderfully on 3+ machines doing everything: ports, buildworld, kernels, etc. No issues at all does the ccache stuff show up first in your path statement? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
