On 6/23/11 2:02 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 23 07:02:56 2011
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Mozilla retires Firefox 4 from security support
Jerry writes:
From URL:
On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox
_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to update to
version 5 which is now in the ports system.
Jerry writes:
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What amazes
me is how quick support was pulled from version 4.
My morning-fogged mind says Version 4 was out less than a
year.
Correct!
On 6/23/11 3:10 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Jerry writes:
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What amazes
me is how quick support was pulled from version 4.
My morning-fogged mind says Version 4
Damien Fleuriot writes:
Although, I'll give you, I'm as confused as everyone regarding
this 4-5 bump, surely they could have done 4.1 or something...
It is my understanding there are (even more) substantial (than
usual) internal changes, particularly relating to HTML v5.
On 23/06/2011 13:02, Robert Huff wrote:
My morning-fogged mind says Version 4 was out less than a year.
Much less than a year. V4 came out in April.
I'm wondering what the big deal is that Mozilla felt they needed to bump
the major version number? There don't seem to have been many user
Le 23/06/2011 14:30, Jerry a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
On 6/23/2011 8:08 AM, Admin Cyanide wrote:
The major difference is that when updating Microsoft's OS from a major
version to another you have to pay.
I'm not flaming, I just want to focus on the fact that this products
have not the same constraints.
What is surprising is why it is not a 4.1
On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 6/23/2011 8:08 AM, Admin Cyanide wrote:
The major difference is that when updating Microsoft's OS from a major
version to another you have to pay.
I'm not flaming, I just want to focus on the fact that this products
have not the same
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:08:39 +0200
Admin Cyanide articulated:
The major difference is that when updating Microsoft's OS from a
major version to another you have to pay.
I'm not flaming, I just want to focus on the fact that this products
have not the same constraints.
We were, or at least I
Why not take this discussion to freebsd-chat?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi all,
Now the different versions of Firefox are :
- Release (version)
- Aurora (version +1)
- Nightly (version +2)
With this roadmap, you don't care with the version number of the release.
There will be only one, not like before with 3.6.x, 3.5.x ...
I think this is really more easy. You will
Quoth Jerry on Thursday, 23 June 2011:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
snip
The best part is that many of my add-ons again no longer work. From
what I can see in the ports system, and I may be wrong, there is not an
option to use the version 4 either although
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:25:16 -0700
Chip Camden articulated:
Yes, Pentadactyl for one. Upgrading to its nightly build version
makes it work, sort of. Looks like text fields no longer scroll
properly. This is taking the Google-led trend of beta is the new
release to extremes.
Google and its,
16 matches
Mail list logo
