> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:45:43AM -0700 I heard the voice of
> Bryan W. Maxwell, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats
>> all good. But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the
>> otherside is connected to a micropic w
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:45:43AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Bryan W. Maxwell, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats all
> good. But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the otherside
> is connected to a micropic web serve
+-- Bryan W. Maxwell [18-06-03 07:45 -0700]:
| Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats all
| good.
eth0? AFAIK, eth0 is not used in FreeBSD. It is used in
Linux. Which OS are you using?
Regards,
Shantanu
--
Want to know how many wor
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
>> +-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
>> | On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
>> | > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the
>> local | > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
>> |
>> |This is by definition.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
> But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the otherside
> is connected to a micropic web server and its address is 192.168.2.3. Thats
> when it returns, the ping: sendto: Network dropped connection on reset.
I believe that a reset
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
> +-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
> | On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
> | > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
> | > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
> |
> | This is by definition. lo0 sh
Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
+-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
| On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
| > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
| > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
|
| This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
| 127.
+-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
| On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
| > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
| > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
|
| This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
| 127.0.0.1.
l
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:51:59PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> 192.168.2.0 is not a valid IP address. The last number must be somewhere
> between 1 and 254 (inclusive).
Well, just to be anal about it... false.
192.168.2.0 is a perfectly valid IP address in
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
> Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
> loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
127.0.0.1. Also, you might want to use 192.168.0.2 instead of
192.168.2.0.
Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0,
192.168.2.0 is not a valid IP address. The last number must be somewhere
between 1 and 254 (inclusive).
but somehow the local
loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
The loopback address is always 127.0.0.1. It's not supposed to
11 matches
Mail list logo