On Friday 10 August 2007 01:16:48 Gary Kline wrote:
> Guys,
>
> A couple years ago I got a hold of Ubuntu and until recent months
> thought it was the best thing since [[ fill-in ]].
> Long-story-shot, I am wedged at 6.06 (a Long Term Support)
> version, and because th
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:24:00PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
> My experience with PC-BSD was that it was just different enough to
> break alot of FreeBSD's documentation, and they don't have enough of
> their own. I was a newbie, of course, but I went with vanilla FreeBSD
> because of the handboo
close. Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
What about a "desktop-BSD"??
tested both when i needed some humour :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
My experience with PC-BSD was that it was just different enough to
break alot of FreeBSD's documentation, and they don't have enough of
their own. I was a newbie, of course, but I went with vanilla FreeBSD
because of the handbook and freebsd-questions, and I've no regrets.
Been at least 9 months.
On 8/9/07, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Guys,
>
>close. Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
>What about a "desktop-BSD"??
>
>suggestion? advice?
I've used PC-BSD, and agree with Jonathan - it's package management
system is a bit funky.
On 8/9/07 8:16 PM, "Gary Kline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
> What about a "desktop-BSD"??
I gave them both a try when I first got into FreeBSD. I didn't particularly
care for their package management system. DesktopBSD has a really cool
li
