> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 16:43, David Robillard wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 11:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > [ --- 8< --- SNIP! --- 8< --- ]
> >
> > That sounds very interesting Jonathan. Could you please share with us
> > the complete LDIF data used to create such a user?
>
> This
On Wednesday 30 April 2008 16:43, David Robillard wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 11:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> [ --- 8< --- SNIP! --- 8< --- ]
>
> > It's true that an object can only belong to one structural class
> > (although it can belong to many auxiliary classes).
> >
> > I use the auxi
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 11:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
[ --- 8< --- SNIP! --- 8< --- ]
> It's true that an object can only belong to one structural class (although it
> can belong to many auxiliary classes).
>
> I use the auxiliary class extensibleObject, which allows you to add any
> attribute t
On Wednesday 30 April 2008 11:00, O. Hartmann wrote:
> O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:07:44AM +, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Hello out there,
> >>> my question may sound a bit weird, but the situation is as follows:
> >>>
> >>> I use OpenLDAP 2.4 for au
O. Hartmann wrote:
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:07:44AM +, O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello out there,
my question may sound a bit weird, but the situation is as follows:
I use OpenLDAP 2.4 for authetication purposes within our lab's net
and every user's account is of the objec
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:07:44AM +, O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello out there,
my question may sound a bit weird, but the situation is as follows:
I use OpenLDAP 2.4 for authetication purposes within our lab's net and
every user's account is of the objectclass 'posixAccount
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:07:44AM +, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello out there,
> my question may sound a bit weird, but the situation is as follows:
>
> I use OpenLDAP 2.4 for authetication purposes within our lab's net and
> every user's account is of the objectclass 'posixAccount'. As we know,
