--- Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400,
Michael Butler wrote:
For everyone's benefit then, please feel free
to submit your patches
along with your technical analysis.
I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then
he can tell all the people
If you see/grep Danial Thom in FreeBSD related, consider this:
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/88q1/13785.8.html
http://amasci.com/weird/flamer.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_war
My personal fav' is the first link...
How do we know that 'DT' even exists? Hmmm.
DT - S, go
--- NOC Meganet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 14 October 2006 17:13, Danial Thom
wrote:
The fact that a processor has 2 cores doesn't
mean you have to use them, just like a MB
with 2
sockets doesn't need both to be used. If the
OS
is faster with 1 processor than 2, then you
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:34:36PM -0700,
Danial Thom wrote:
Yeah, bury your head in the sand as always.
Its been proven over and over. Robert Watson
has
admitted many times that 6.x is not as fast
as
4.x uniprocessor
FOR CERTAIN
