--- Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Angstadt wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I
> am
> > very pleased to say that my times have decreased
> from
> > an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run.
> >
> > Along the way, I have cleaned
Jim Angstadt wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I am
> very pleased to say that my times have decreased from
> an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run.
>
> Along the way, I have cleaned up "conflicts" and did
> "pkg_delete" on several applications that were
Jim Angstadt wrote:
--- Aaron Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Angstadt wrote:
Hi All,
Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I
am
very pleased to say that my times have decreased
from
an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run.
Along the w
--- Aaron Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Angstadt wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I
> am
> > very pleased to say that my times have decreased
> from
> > an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run.
> >
> > Along the way, I have cleaned up "con
Jim Angstadt wrote:
Hi All,
Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I am
very pleased to say that my times have decreased from
an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run.
Along the way, I have cleaned up "conflicts" and did
"pkg_delete" on several applications that were
"included in b
