Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-25 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 3/24/06, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/03/06, Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eric Schultz wrote:
> > > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:
> > >>> I administer this box by remote.
> > >>
> > >> Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
> > >> mode" you're looking for.
> > >>
> > > Good morning...
> > >
> > > How remote is "remote"?
> > >
> > > If it's just down the hall you can probably get a DB25/DB9 (depending
> > > on the machine) to RJ45 adapter and use existing CAT5 cable to get to
> > > a serial console to your desk.  There even exist serial RJ45 switch
> > > boxes if you have several machines to "remote" administer.
> > >
> > > If it's farther than that, like in another building/city/etc. you can
> > > always setup a modem on the box's serial port and dial in to that.
> > > You'll need a modem at your end too, which means either an analog line
> > > or a analog-to-digital tap for your office phone.
> > >
> > > I have no idea whether there any serial-over-IP solutions.  But you
> > > could build one with FreeBSD!!!
> > >
> > I have a slave name server at the same location.  Maybe I can run a
> > serial cable with a crosover between the two of them.
> > ___
>
> I think the docs are just playing safe, I admin over 10 servers and
> have remote updated each one at least once, I have never had any
> problems doing all this in multi user mode.
>
> make buildworld
> make buildkernel
> make installkernel
> reboot
> mergemaster -p
> make installworld
> mergemaster -iv
> reboot
>
> Chris

5.4 => 6.0 upgrade caused some problems on a box
under high load until I used a serial console and did
everything by the book.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-24 Thread Chris
On 23/03/06, Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Schultz wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:
> >>> I administer this box by remote.
> >>
> >> Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
> >> mode" you're looking for.
> >>
> > Good morning...
> >
> > How remote is "remote"?
> >
> > If it's just down the hall you can probably get a DB25/DB9 (depending
> > on the machine) to RJ45 adapter and use existing CAT5 cable to get to
> > a serial console to your desk.  There even exist serial RJ45 switch
> > boxes if you have several machines to "remote" administer.
> >
> > If it's farther than that, like in another building/city/etc. you can
> > always setup a modem on the box's serial port and dial in to that.
> > You'll need a modem at your end too, which means either an analog line
> > or a analog-to-digital tap for your office phone.
> >
> > I have no idea whether there any serial-over-IP solutions.  But you
> > could build one with FreeBSD!!!
> >
> I have a slave name server at the same location.  Maybe I can run a
> serial cable with a crosover between the two of them.
> ___

I think the docs are just playing safe, I admin over 10 servers and
have remote updated each one at least once, I have never had any
problems doing all this in multi user mode.

make buildworld
make buildkernel
make installkernel
reboot
mergemaster -p
make installworld
mergemaster -iv
reboot

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-24 Thread Chris Maness

Chris wrote:

On 23/03/06, Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

Eric Schultz wrote:


Kris Kennaway wrote:
  

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:


I administer this box by remote.
  

Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
mode" you're looking for.



Good morning...

How remote is "remote"?

If it's just down the hall you can probably get a DB25/DB9 (depending
on the machine) to RJ45 adapter and use existing CAT5 cable to get to
a serial console to your desk.  There even exist serial RJ45 switch
boxes if you have several machines to "remote" administer.

If it's farther than that, like in another building/city/etc. you can
always setup a modem on the box's serial port and dial in to that.
You'll need a modem at your end too, which means either an analog line
or a analog-to-digital tap for your office phone.

I have no idea whether there any serial-over-IP solutions.  But you
could build one with FreeBSD!!!

  

I have a slave name server at the same location.  Maybe I can run a
serial cable with a crosover between the two of them.
___



I think the docs are just playing safe, I admin over 10 servers and
have remote updated each one at least once, I have never had any
problems doing all this in multi user mode.

make buildworld
make buildkernel
make installkernel
reboot
mergemaster -p
make installworld
mergemaster -iv
reboot

Chris

  

Yep, I went ahead and did it in multi user mode.  No problems.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Maness

Eric Schultz wrote:

Kris Kennaway wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:

I administer this box by remote.


Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
mode" you're looking for.


Good morning...

How remote is "remote"?

If it's just down the hall you can probably get a DB25/DB9 (depending 
on the machine) to RJ45 adapter and use existing CAT5 cable to get to 
a serial console to your desk.  There even exist serial RJ45 switch 
boxes if you have several machines to "remote" administer.


If it's farther than that, like in another building/city/etc. you can 
always setup a modem on the box's serial port and dial in to that. 
You'll need a modem at your end too, which means either an analog line 
or a analog-to-digital tap for your office phone.


I have no idea whether there any serial-over-IP solutions.  But you 
could build one with FreeBSD!!!


I have a slave name server at the same location.  Maybe I can run a 
serial cable with a crosover between the two of them.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-23 Thread Eric Schultz

Kris Kennaway wrote:

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:

I administer this box by remote.


Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
mode" you're looking for.


Good morning...

How remote is "remote"?

If it's just down the hall you can probably get a DB25/DB9 (depending on 
the machine) to RJ45 adapter and use existing CAT5 cable to get to a 
serial console to your desk.  There even exist serial RJ45 switch boxes 
if you have several machines to "remote" administer.


If it's farther than that, like in another building/city/etc. you can 
always setup a modem on the box's serial port and dial in to that. 
You'll need a modem at your end too, which means either an analog line 
or a analog-to-digital tap for your office phone.


I have no idea whether there any serial-over-IP solutions.  But you 
could build one with FreeBSD!!!


--
Headed for the second star to the right and straight on 'til morning...

  Eric Schultz
  (aka Storkman)

Photos: http://community.webshots.com/user/schultznet
Homepage: http://www.schultznet.ca
Blog: http://schultznet.blogspot.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-22 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:
>> In the make file for /usr/src it says I need to boot into single user 
>> mode.  Is this possible from a remote connection (I don't think it is)?  
>> Do I have to be in single user mode to do the following?:
>> 
>> # 5.  `reboot'(in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt).
>> # 6.  `mergemaster -p'
>> # 7.  `make installworld'
>> # 8.  `mergemaster'
>> # 9.  `reboot'
>> 
>> I administer this box by remote.
>
>You absolutely need to in certain situations.  Sometimes (even often)
>you can get away without it, but sometimes your system won't reboot to
>multiuser mode unless you do those steps.
>
>Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
>mode" you're looking for.

I have been able to work in single user mode on some systems by getting
somebody with physical access to the box to boot in single user then start
networking and secure shell manually.  Once the sshd daemon was running I
could get to the box from another machine on the LAN.

The last time I did this was on an SCO OpenServer box which started the
networking even in single user mode.  I would have to RTFM to figure out if
and how this can be done with FreeBSD.

Bill
--
INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:(206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676

Democracy, n.:
A government of the masses.  Authority derived through mass
meeting or any other form of direct expression.  Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is communistic... negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate,
whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion,
prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Result is demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
-- U. S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 (1928-1932),
   since withdrawn.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode?

2006-03-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote:
> In the make file for /usr/src it says I need to boot into single user 
> mode.  Is this possible from a remote connection (I don't think it is)?  
> Do I have to be in single user mode to do the following?:
> 
> # 5.  `reboot'(in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt).
> # 6.  `mergemaster -p'
> # 7.  `make installworld'
> # 8.  `mergemaster'
> # 9.  `reboot'
> 
> I administer this box by remote.

You absolutely need to in certain situations.  Sometimes (even often)
you can get away without it, but sometimes your system won't reboot to
multiuser mode unless you do those steps.

Look into setting up a serial console; this is the "remote single user
mode" you're looking for.

Kris


pgpLnReMHgwmP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Remote Single User Mode.

2004-04-10 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 10:29:31AM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004, Grant Peel wrote:
> >Happy Easter all!
> >
> >Here is an off-the-wall question
> 
> >I have 4 servers in Toronto (I live in London, about 120 miles south). Most
> >admin I can do remotely of course, but I was wondering, if there exists a
> >software/hardware solution that might actually allow one to reboot any one
> >of the machines remotely and alllow access in single user mode. Obviously,
> >that machine would not be accessable via the normal netwrk method, but
> >again, is there a KVM - software that would allow local access in single
> >user mode VIA a network connection to one of the other servers, or the KVM
> >directly?
> 
> I haven't tried this on FreeBSD, but several years ago I had to do some
> single user work on an SCO OpenServer box in Texas.  I had the owner of the
> machine start sshd in single user mode, then I could ssh into the system to
> work.  The SCO box activates the network in single user.  FreeBSD would
> probably require starting network services manually.
> 
> Bill

You might want to look into PC Weasel cards.

Josh Paetzel

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode.

2004-04-10 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004, Grant Peel wrote:
>Happy Easter all!
>
>Here is an off-the-wall question

>I have 4 servers in Toronto (I live in London, about 120 miles south). Most
>admin I can do remotely of course, but I was wondering, if there exists a
>software/hardware solution that might actually allow one to reboot any one
>of the machines remotely and alllow access in single user mode. Obviously,
>that machine would not be accessable via the normal netwrk method, but
>again, is there a KVM - software that would allow local access in single
>user mode VIA a network connection to one of the other servers, or the KVM
>directly?

I haven't tried this on FreeBSD, but several years ago I had to do some
single user work on an SCO OpenServer box in Texas.  I had the owner of the
machine start sshd in single user mode, then I could ssh into the system to
work.  The SCO box activates the network in single user.  FreeBSD would
probably require starting network services manually.

Bill
--
INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:   camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:(206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

``If we got one-tenth of what was promised to us in these acceptance
speeches there wouldn't be any inducement to go to heaven.''
Will Rogers
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode.

2004-04-10 Thread Olaf Hoyer
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Grant Peel wrote:

> Happy Easter all!
>
> Here is an off-the-wall question
>
> I have 4 servers in Toronto (I live in London, about 120 miles south). Most admin I 
> can do remotely of course, but I was wondering, if there exists a software/hardware 
> solution that might actually allow one to reboot any one of the machines remotely 
> and alllow access in single user mode. Obviously, that machine would not be 
> accessable via the normal netwrk method, but again, is there a KVM - software that 
> would allow local access in single user mode VIA a network connection to one of the 
> other servers, or the KVM directly?

Hi!

Well, as long as you can set up a serial console to them (whether in
software, like described in the handbook, or via hardware BIOS
redirection like Dell, HP and so on), then you could simply buy a remote
console switch off-the-rack, and be happy.

I worked a lot with the cyclades-TS series, you simply connect via ssh
to them (they run embedded linux), and they forward this connection to
the specific serial port. The also do other nifty things, you can have
the console output of the servers logged via nfs to a remote machine
etc.

www.cyclades.com, they are not cheap, but are working well (once you got
he right firmware, I'd go for 1.3.9 at the time of this writing, the
1.3.10 has other hitches I dislike)


HTH
Olaf




-- 
Olaf Hoyer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten,
ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist.
(Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Remote Single User Mode.

2004-04-10 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:03:48AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:

> I have 4 servers in Toronto (I live in London, about 120 miles south). Most admin I 
> can do remotely of course, but I was wondering, if there exists a software/hardware 
> solution that might actually allow one to reboot any one of the machines remotely 
> and alllow access in single user mode. Obviously, that machine would not be 
> accessable via the normal netwrk method, but again, is there a KVM - software that 
> would allow local access in single user mode VIA a network connection to one of the 
> other servers, or the KVM directly?

The device you're looking for is a 'Console Server'.  There are any
number of such devices available off the shelf -- Lantronix makes some
reasonably good ones.

However, if you don't want to spend money, you can daisy-chain your
FreeBSD boxes together using null-modem cables between the serial
ports and use tip(1) as a terminal emulator. In any case you need to
make your servers use a serial port as the system console:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature