Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-30 Thread Igor Robul
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 03:04:42AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > SMTP with SSL/TLS and authentication for a network works wonders.. I'm not talking about _my_ users sending mail, I'm talking about mail _to_ my users :-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.or

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-29 Thread GiL Virtucio
Spam?i love spam :) it's very yummy on wheat bread and it's even better if you add egg and cheese :P === Gil A. Virtucio Janitor/Kolektor/Messenger/Driver Asia Solution Phillippines Inc. 28/F Antel Global Corporate Center 3 Doña Julia Vargas Avenue, Ortigas Cent

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-29 Thread Garrett Cooper
Igor Robul wrote: On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:53:12AM -0700, Olga Zenkova wrote: mailboxes with field "To: user3" in it. There are no user1 or user2 in this field. Is it possible to cut off these letters? Especially it is difficult to explain for user1 and user2 why they got letters addressed

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-29 Thread Igor Robul
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:53:12AM -0700, Olga Zenkova wrote: > mailboxes with field "To: user3" in it. There are no > user1 or user2 in this field. Is it possible to cut > off these letters? Especially it is difficult to > explain for user1 and user2 why they got letters > addressed not for them.

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-25 Thread Mikhail Goriachev
Adrian Pavone wrote: > Derek Ragona wrote: >> There are many ways to combat spam. One of the easiest is to use >> mailscanner in the ports. >> >> You can configure mailscanner to compare senders against known lists >> of SPAMers, in addition to it's own rules. >> >> -Derek >> >> >> At 09:5

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-25 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:53:12AM -0700, Olga Zenkova wrote: > I use sendmail 8.13.3 and gather full log of its work. > I see such strings in it: > > <<< RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> 250 2.1.5 ... Recipient ok > <<< RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> 250 2.1.5 ... Recipient ok > <<< DATA > <<<

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-25 Thread Adrian Pavone
Derek Ragona wrote: There are many ways to combat spam. One of the easiest is to use mailscanner in the ports. You can configure mailscanner to compare senders against known lists of SPAMers, in addition to it's own rules. -Derek At 09:53 AM 5/25/2006, Olga Zenkova wrote: I use s

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-25 Thread Derek Ragona
There are many ways to combat spam. One of the easiest is to use mailscanner in the ports. You can configure mailscanner to compare senders against known lists of SPAMers, in addition to it's own rules. -Derek At 09:53 AM 5/25/2006, Olga Zenkova wrote: I use sendmail 8.13.3 and ga

Re: Spam problem!

2006-05-25 Thread Bill Moran
Olga Zenkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use sendmail 8.13.3 and gather full log of its work. > I see such strings in it: > > <<< RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> 250 2.1.5 ... Recipient ok > <<< RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> 250 2.1.5 ... Recipient ok > <<< DATA > <<< To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SPAM Problem

2005-08-19 Thread Danny MacMillan
Aaron Siegel wrote: Hello This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have my email address as the originator of the bo

Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem]

2005-07-25 Thread Igor Robul
Greg Maruszeczka wrote: It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address book and inserting it into the from: header of the message c

Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem]

2005-07-24 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 07/23/05 05:11 PM, Greg Maruszeczka sat at the `puter and typed: > Aaron Siegel wrote: > > Hello > > > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help > > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > > various mail servers which have

Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem]

2005-07-23 Thread Hornet
On 7/23/05, Greg Maruszeczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aaron Siegel wrote: > > Hello > > > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help > > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > > various mail servers which have bounced message

[OT Re: SPAM Problem]

2005-07-23 Thread Greg Maruszeczka
Aaron Siegel wrote: > Hello > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have my > email address as the originator

Re: SPAM Problem

2005-07-23 Thread Glenn Dawson
At 11:37 AM 7/23/2005, Aaron Siegel wrote: Hello This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have my email address as the o