Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 15:08:53 Thomas Mueller wrote:
I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I
tried the opposite.
I have here 2 hard disks and 2 flash drives with USB 2.0. Three of them work
on FreeBSD on an USB 3.0 port. One hard disk only works
On 06/22/12 08:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
and hardware in the lab on last week.
I reformatted the USB drive with extFAT and standard block size on
Windows 7. The USB drive is now seen again on FreeBSD and recognized as
this points that the pendrive's controller is not just flaky but horrid.
The communiation with OS, and how/whether it
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working way
to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB mass
storage devices which work with *BSD :)
Just my 5 yen,
-|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku
| __ t...@tackymt.homeip.net
What if a USB mass storage
What if a USB mass storage device works with some BSDs but not all?
well the only thing i never experiences with USB pendrives is a one that
works everytime properly. Everything else is possible.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
Then re-plug it.
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is
difficult to
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 15:08:53 Thomas Mueller wrote:
I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I
tried the opposite.
I have here 2 hard disks and 2 flash drives with USB 2.0. Three of them work
on FreeBSD on an USB 3.0 port. One hard disk only works on
On Saturday 23 June 2012 11:52:53 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
Then re-plug it.
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
tested with the timing of
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:05 +0700
Erich Dollansky articulated:
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
That is really sad. I am sort of forced to use USB devices on a
daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD, which is why I
do not exhibit such a negative attitude,
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 18:18:58 Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:05 +0700
Erich Dollansky articulated:
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
That is really sad. I am sort of forced to use USB devices on a
daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.comwrote:
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working
way
to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB
mass
storage devices which work with *BSD :)
Just my 5 yen,
ports.
Same as in my case.
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
but this is not USB standard fault, but USB device manufacturers that
cannot really read standard specifications. It works (under windoze,
under linux) is enough.
___
daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD, which is why I
do not exhibit such a negative attitude, except of course when I do
attempt to plug one in a FreeBSD machine with negative results. I do
not know what is more pathetic; the fact that so many devices fail to
operate correctly
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
ports.
Same as in my case.
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
but this is not USB standard fault, but USB device manufacturers that
cannot really read standard specifications. It works (under
windoze, under linux) is enough.
If the ROI does not exceed the expenditure to meet a specification that
only applies to a niche segment of the potential market, then it is in
all probability not going to happen.
Right. Fine.
There is not written on them conforms to USB Mass Storage standard
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:01 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system
On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system at the lab was also capable of
incapable of handling the 64GB drive. I do not have issues with USB
it's not about capacity. But seems some quirks for that pendrive (which
have buggy firmware) has to be added, as it doesn't respond for inquiry
command.
sorry i am not USB expert.
umass1: Lexar USB Flash Drive, class 0/0,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system
On Jun 22, 2012 10:45 AM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB
20 matches
Mail list logo
