On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:17:55 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
> You need to use ${UNIQUENAME}_SET, and to find the UNIQUENAME you
> need to;
>
> [crees@pegasus]~% cd /usr/ports/www/apache22
> [crees@pegasus]/usr/ports/www/apache22% make -VUNIQUENAME
> apache22
>
> Now we know it's apache22, we can
On 16 September 2012 10:37, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Wa
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Chris,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for this.
>
On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Chris,
>> >
>> > Thanks for this.
>> >
>> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and eve
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington
> wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even
> > examples:)
>
> There are examples on the Wiki page already, but i
On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even
> examples:)
There are examples on the Wiki page already, but in a confusing order.
I've put in a link, and a tip on how to find UNIQUE
Hi Chris,
Thanks for this.
Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even
examples:)
Personally, I use `make config` and have never needed to do much with
/etc/make.conf as regards the ports.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 0
On 16 September 2012 07:19, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Solmin Vladimir wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
>>
>> # apache22
>> .if ${.CURDIR} == ${PORTSDIR}/www/apache22
>> WITH_SUEXEC=YES
>> SUEXEC_DOCROO
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Solmin Vladimir wrote:
> Hi!
> Im using apache 2.2.22_6 with make options in /etc/make.conf
>
> # apache22
> .if ${.CURDIR} == ${PORTSDIR}/www/apache22
> WITH_SUEXEC=YES
> SUEXEC_DOCROOT= /www
> SUEXEC_USERDIR= /www/*/cgi-bin
> SUEXEC_L
bsd wrote:
>
> Le 21 août 2012 à 04:10, John Levine a écrit :
>
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue
with the latest.
>>>
>>> Hmmn, that might have been it.
>>>
>>> I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again
>>> without APC.
>>
Le 21 août 2012 à 04:10, John Levine a écrit :
>>> Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
>>> the
>>> latest.
>>
>> Hmmn, that might have been it.
>>
>> I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
>> APC.
>
> Tried it without
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:42 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Good thought, I just did that. Results:
>>>
>>> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
>>>
>>> php5.4: fails in random ways
>>>
>>> This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD
>>> 8.x.
>>> I note that the packa
>> Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
>> the
>> latest.
>
>Hmmn, that might have been it.
>
>I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
>APC.
Tried it without APC, didn't help. We're back to the theory that there's
something
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with the
latest.
Hmmn, that might have been it.
I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
APC.
R's,
John
John R. Levine wrote:
>> Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
>> and compare the results!
>
> Good thought, I just did that. Results:
>
> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
>
> php5.4: fails in random ways
>
> This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x.
I note that the packages for 8.x have gone away on the distribution server,
so I expect they're not regression
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
the latest.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubsc
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
>> and compare the results!
>>
>
> Good thought, I just did that. Results:
>
> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
>
> php5.4: fails in random ways
>
> This su
On 20 Aug 2012 16:46:13 -
John Levine articulated:
> I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and
> PHP 5.4.5.
>
> In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of
> random errors, they hang, errors claiming that builtins like
> require_once() are not
Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
and compare the results!
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x.
I note t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> I've done all the usual voodoo repair: I have rebuilt apache, php, and
>>> all the php modules from source, and rebooted, and it didn't help.
>>>
>>
> Did you also rebuilt lang/php5-extensions for the modules you need?
>>
>
> Uh, yes, I
I've done all the usual voodoo repair: I have rebuilt apache, php, and
all the php modules from source, and rebooted, and it didn't help.
Did you also rebuilt lang/php5-extensions for the modules you need?
Uh, yes, I said that I did.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, John Levine wrote:
> I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and PHP
> 5.4.5.
>
> In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of random
> errors,
> they hang, errors claiming that builtins like require_once() are not
> f
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
>> Hmm
>> I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in
>> sysctl security.jail.sysvipc_al
Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
Hmm
I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in sysctl
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed is still 0 after the reboot
# sysctl -a | gr
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
Hmm
I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in sysctl
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed is still 0 after the reboot
# sysctl -a | grep sysvipc
security.jail.param.all
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 7/17/12 4:40 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
> hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start
> from scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering
> if anyone on this list has switched
On Jul 18, 2012 5:19 AM, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>
>> I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from
scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone
on this list has s
I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from
scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone
on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
it depends of your nee
Thanks, Chuck. That's very useful input.
--On July 17, 2012 10:40:30 AM -0700 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 17, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start
fr
n dhert wrote:
> On FreeBSD 8.3 I have apache22 web server with PHP. PHP is PHP52 for
> compatibility with existing applications, but the most recent version
> in the php52 branch
> $ php --version
> PHP 5.2.17 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: May 7 2012 08:45:58)
>
>>From time to time, I
On 21 Jun 2012, at 08:34, n dhert wrote:
> On FreeBSD 8.3 I have apache22 web server with PHP. PHP is PHP52 for
> compatibility with existing applications, but the most recent version
> in the php52 branch
> $ php --version
> PHP 5.2.17 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: May 7 2012 08:45:58
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Thanks!
--
chs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o
On 10/04/2012 08:05, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> I see this error in the error log of apache. It seems to happen
> whenever someone do a GET on certain mp3-files on my server. What does
> this error mean?
It can be due to various different reasons. At a guess, probably this:
https://issues.apach
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Lewis
wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
I am assuming you want to run mod_perl on mod_work
On 1/16/12 1:03 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel Lewis
> 561-676-1073
Hi,
Sadly, "p
On 1/11/2012 4:39 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> sorry, somehow i missed that paragraph about commenting out the other
> modules... hope i didn't send you on a wild goose chase for nothing. but
> the behavior you describe sounds like what happens running with a
> mismatched php.ini... i once tried to
On Jan 11, 2012 12:54 PM, "Waitman Gobble" wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2012 12:39 PM, "Robert Fitzpatrick" wrote:
> >
> > Upgraded php52 to php53 by pkg_delete of php5 and porinstall php52. Then
> > I had to manually resort back to php52 by pkg_delete and then
> > portinstall and now getting a seg fa
On Jan 11, 2012 12:39 PM, "Robert Fitzpatrick" wrote:
>
> Upgraded php52 to php53 by pkg_delete of php5 and porinstall php52. Then
> I had to manually resort back to php52 by pkg_delete and then
> portinstall and now getting a seg fault when restarting apache22 on this
> FreeBSD 8.1 server. I narr
Sergio Tam wrote:
> 2011/9/20 n dhert :
>> Monday I did a portupgrade
>> apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
>> There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
>> /usr/ports/UPDATING)
>> Today Tuesday afternoon I did a
>> # apachectl
2011/9/20 Odhiambo Washington
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:45, Sergio Tam wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/20 n dhert :
>> > Monday I did a portupgrade
>> > apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has
>> 2.2.21)
>> > There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mention
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:45, Sergio Tam wrote:
> 2011/9/20 n dhert :
> > Monday I did a portupgrade
> > apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
> > There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
> > /usr/ports/UPDATING)
> > Today Tues
2011/9/20 n dhert :
> Monday I did a portupgrade
> apache-2.2.20 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
> There was no problem during the update (and nothing special mentionned in
> /usr/ports/UPDATING)
> Today Tuesday afternoon I did a
> # apachectl graceful
> Since them, seve
Damien Fleuriot
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:25 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 + PHP5 + SuExec + (fast-cgi or mod_fcgid)
>
> *fast* cgi , which as the name implies, is erm, fast ;)
>
> See, only apache has PHP as a module.
>
> O
Should I be using suPHP then instead of the formentioned suexec/mod_fcgid ?
-Grant
-Original Message-
From: Damien Fleuriot
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:25 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 + PHP5 + SuExec + (fast-cgi or mod_fcgid)
*fast* cgi , which as
*fast* cgi , which as the name implies, is erm, fast ;)
See, only apache has PHP as a module.
Other web servers such as nginx or lighttpd use a fastcgi process.
This has several advantages:
- you'll no longer see apache exit with (quote) a "signal 11, core
dumped" because of lousy php code / er
I am under the impression that suPHP is the better/more secure way of
running PHP with Apache. In addition you don't need suEXEC to do so. Am
I incorrect in these assumptions? What are the benefits of running PHP
as a CGI(if you don't mind me asking) ?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: owner-
Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> i want say its running now perfect. I has search in internet and found
> the follow Howto, and now it run.
>
> http://blog.myprod.net/2010/08/14/apache2-suexec-fastcgi-php-5-3-3-fpm-
cache-opcode-apc/
That is excellent. I had also forgoten all about the sue
Hello,
i want say its running now perfect. I has search in internet and found
the follow Howto, and now it run.
http://blog.myprod.net/2010/08/14/apache2-suexec-fastcgi-php-5-3-3-fpm-cache-opcode-apc/
Regards
Silvio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> i use fastcgi with PHP-FPM on Apache 2.2.17. When i go on Website with
> FastCGI then the page load not complete.
>
> http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fastcgi_apache.png
>
> When i run with FCGID then the page load complete.
>
> http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fcgid
Hey,
Am 02.03.2011 15:25, schrieb Ivan Voras:
>
> This is not a FreeBSD problem.
Thank u, that i know. But i has think that is a user list, someone can
help me. Because i try since weeks and found not where is the mistake.
> The most likely problem is that your FastCGI configuration handles mor
On 01/03/2011 20:22, Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hello,
i use fastcgi with PHP-FPM on Apache 2.2.17. When i go on Website with
FastCGI then the page load not complete.
http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fastcgi_apache.png
When i run with FCGID then the page load complete.
http://mail.silviosiefke.de/fcgid
On 07/01/2011 12:43, Paul Halliday wrote:
> I am trying to build apache22 on a fresh 8.1 box from ports. It is
> dying right about here:
>
> mod_authnz_ldap.c:41:2: error: #error mod_authnz_ldap requires
> APR-util to have LDAP support built in. To fix add --with-ldap to
> ./configure.
Add LDAP s
On 06/03/2010 02:16 AM, John wrote:
> On 2010-06-03 07:45, Benjamin Lee wrote:
>> On 05/20/2010 06:02 AM, John wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list.
>>>
>>> I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my
>>> servers.
>>> I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
On 2010-06-03 07:45, Benjamin Lee wrote:
On 05/20/2010 06:02 AM, John wrote:
Hi list.
I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my
servers.
I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
only difference is this ones running CURRENT while they tr
On 05/20/2010 06:02 AM, John wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my
> servers.
> I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
> only difference is this ones running CURRENT while they track RELEASE.
>
> Some info:
>
> #
On 6/2/10, John wrote:
> On 2010-06-02 18:56, Tim Judd wrote:
>> On 6/2/10, John wrote:
>>> On 2010-05-20 23:34, Tim Judd wrote:
On 5/20/10, John wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my
> servers.
> I have the exact same
On 2010-06-02 18:56, Tim Judd wrote:
On 6/2/10, John wrote:
On 2010-05-20 23:34, Tim Judd wrote:
On 5/20/10, John wrote:
Hi list.
I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my
servers.
I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
only differen
On 6/2/10, John wrote:
> On 2010-05-20 23:34, Tim Judd wrote:
>> On 5/20/10, John wrote:
>>> Hi list.
>>>
>>> I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my
>>> servers.
>>> I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
>>> only difference is this ones
On 2010-05-20 23:34, Tim Judd wrote:
On 5/20/10, John wrote:
Hi list.
I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my servers.
I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
only difference is this ones running CURRENT while they track RELEASE.
Some
On 5/20/10, John wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I'm having problems getting mod_auth_kerb to play nice on one of my servers.
> I have the exact same setup on other machines and it works perfectly,
> only difference is this ones running CURRENT while they track RELEASE.
>
> Some info:
>
> # pkg_info|grep ap
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Aiza wrote:
> Nothing is worse than someone insinuating the original poster don't know
> what they are talking about. I find your remarks totally un-necessary. Your
> telling the poster they don't know what their doing when it's you who don't
> know what options a
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/05/2010 04:55:26, Aiza wrote:
I take a totally different approach to this problem for my production
web sites. This is the result of people running scripts that roll
through a large block of ip address scanning each ip ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/05/2010 04:55:26, Aiza wrote:
> I take a totally different approach to this problem for my production
> web sites. This is the result of people running scripts that roll
> through a large block of ip address scanning each ip address for open
> [S
Hi,
Am 19.05.10 05:00, schrieb Aiza:
Where do I find documentation on how to enable and use apache mods
rewrite and redirect?
have you tried the apache.org website?
There is a lot of information and examples available:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html
Also google helps a
> apache-2.2.15_5 < needs updating (index has 2.2.15_7)
> it also installed apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42 1.4.2.1.3.9_1
> but apache fails to build,
> Is there a solution?
I had the same problem. Then I read /usr/ports/UPDATING, and from
that file its says this:
20100518:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/05/2010 11:00:16, Aiza wrote:
I put apache13 in a jail and left inbound port 80 open in my firewall.
There is no domain name pointing to my web server. The content there is
a small apache web application that fools web
em
Michael Powell wrote:
Aiza wrote:
I put apache13 in a jail and left inbound port 80 open in my firewall.
There is no domain name pointing to my web server. The content there is
a small apache web application that fools web
email address harvest programs into harvesting bogus email address from
--On Tuesday, May 18, 2010 18:00:16 +0800 Aiza wrote:
Has anyone seen this junk hitting their apache web servers or have any
different explanation of what this means?
Any webserver on the internet will see that crap. Generally it's preceded by a
syn scan to identify hosts listening on port
Aiza wrote:
> I put apache13 in a jail and left inbound port 80 open in my firewall.
> There is no domain name pointing to my web server. The content there is
> a small apache web application that fools web
> email address harvest programs into harvesting bogus email address from
> web page. http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/05/2010 11:00:16, Aiza wrote:
> I put apache13 in a jail and left inbound port 80 open in my firewall.
> There is no domain name pointing to my web server. The content there is
> a small apache web application that fools web
> email address harve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/05/2010 21:09:26, Chris Maness wrote:
> I while back, I set up a podcast using wordpress. I did not use any
> special configuration, I just added the files as media, and the
> podcast software picked up the mp3's. However, now I would like to
>
Use a simple CGI script perhaps? The script can then return whatever headers
(including a redirect) you desire.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
> I while back, I set up a podcast using wordpress. I did not use any
> special configuration, I just added the files as media, and
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> doug schmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> doug schmidt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:44
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
doug schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> doug schmidt wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:44 PM, doug schmidt
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> doug schmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:44 PM, doug schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM, doug schmidt
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Greg Larki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
doug schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:44 PM, doug schmidt
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM, doug schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:44 PM, doug schmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM, doug schmidt
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> doug schmidt wrote:
On a 7.3-release box, I upgraded to php 5.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM, doug schmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> doug schmidt wrote:
>>> On a 7.3-release box, I upgraded to php 5.3.2 + extensions. All seems
>
>>> [Tue Apr 27 16:08:37 2010] [no
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> doug schmidt wrote:
>> On a 7.3-release box, I upgraded to php 5.3.2 + extensions. All seems
>> [Tue Apr 27 16:08:37 2010] [notice] child pid 37609 exit signal Bus error
>> (10)
>>
> Check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
doug schmidt wrote:
> On a 7.3-release box, I upgraded to php 5.3.2 + extensions. All seems
> to be working fine with our php developed application,
> however when I start apache, I get this in the apache error log;
>
> [Tue Apr 27 16:08:33 2010] [not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 09:38:38, Fbsd1 wrote:
> I have Perl and apache installed on my system. Do I have to do anything
> additional to get apache to run Perl CGI programs?
> Is putting the perl script in the cgi-bin directory at
> /usr/local/www/data all it ta
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)
wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell, it doesn't even get to the certificate
>> verification phase even though the STARTTLS command is successful.
>
> Is there any level of debugging that can be increased on the Apache side ?
> Possibly a
As far as I can tell, it doesn't even get to the certificate
verification phase even though the STARTTLS command is successful.
Is there any level of debugging that can be increased on the Apache side
? Possibly a build/compile-time option for the module?
Debugging apache code can always b
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Wasted many hours on this and am no closer to a solution. I'm trying
> to get apache 2.2 on FreeBSD 7.2 to authenticate against our active
> directory (Windows 2003).
>
> The current status is that authentication works without
Monty Pyth wrote:
I have inherited a website to work on that users authenticate to
using a login and password from a login page. The server is FreeBSD
6.2 running APACHE/PHP/MYSQL. There is a MYSQL table that maintains
all of the users. The table has a users name and password. The
password is has
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Monty Pyth wrote:
> I have inherited a website to work on that users authenticate to using a
> login and password from a login page. The server is FreeBSD 6.2 running
> APACHE/PHP/MYSQL. There is a MYSQL table that maintains all of the users. The
> table has a u
Hi,
> The password is hashed and some examples are:
>
> 02SvtVJnRLzuQ
> 42jhVP6kxUBX6
>
> Can anyone tell me what file I would look at to see what hash
> algorithm is being used to store the passwords in the table? Any
> help would be great.
As a hint, to help make it easier to reply, where are
Michael Powell wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
>
>>> Robert Huff wrote:
>>> > David Southwell writes:
>>> >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
>>> >> Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
Oh - forgot - this is what an ldd of my imap.so looks like on 7.2:
testbed# pwd
/u
David Southwell wrote:
>> Robert Huff wrote:
>> > David Southwell writes:
>> >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
>> >> Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
>> >
>> > I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) "is
>> > this a problem with Apache, or a probl
> Robert Huff wrote:
> > David Southwell writes:
> >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
> >> Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
> >
> > I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) "is
> > this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?".
>
> Easy enough
Robert Huff wrote:
>
> David Southwell writes:
>
>> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
>> Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
>
> I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) "is
> this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?".
>
>
Easy enough to
> David Southwell writes:
> > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
> > Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
>
> I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) "is
> this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?".
>
>
> Ro
David Southwell writes:
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
> Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) "is
this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?".
Robert huff
_
I would guess that the imap.so symbol issue is what is causing Apache to
die...
The certificate-related messages are warnings and should not make it fatal.
Markiyan.
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Southwell wrote:
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:17 2009] [warn] RSA server certi
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > Hi--
> >
> > On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> >> [Wed Oct 07 16:03:17 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
> >> certificate
> >> (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
> >> [Wed Oct 07 16:03:18 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
> >> certifi
Hi--
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Southwell wrote:
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:17 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
certificate
(BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:18 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
certificate
(BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
/libexec/ld-e
On Monday 18 May 2009 10:55:00 Odhiambo ワシントン wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Brent Clark
wrote:
> > Hiya
> >
> > I have the following in my /etc/rc.conf
> >
> > mitm# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep apache
> > apache22_enable="YES"
> > mitm#
> >
> > The problem I seem to be experiencing is th
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
> Hiya
>
> I have the following in my /etc/rc.conf
>
> mitm# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep apache
> apache22_enable="YES"
> mitm#
>
> The problem I seem to be experiencing is that if I reboot the machine, then
> apache does not come up. Its only on wh
1 - 100 of 705 matches
Mail list logo
