# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-24 19:02:43 -0400:
On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote:
PS - And that reminds me! Why am I still ssh'ing someplace and running
pine when I could be running xpine and (probably) POP3s'ing my mail to my box!!!
Because you haven't discovered fetchmail and mutt
On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote:
Is mutt a lot like PINE?
Yes, but with a more loyal following.
I donno - Myself, I am pretty devoted to PINE (i.e. very much in love)
The thing is, I think I want just a client, not a daemon to move or copy
over my /var/mail/$USER from another box
At 2002-09-24T05:22:39Z, Peter Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS - And that reminds me! Why am I still ssh'ing someplace and running
pine when I could be running xpine and (probably) POP3s'ing my mail to my
box!!!
Because you haven't discovered fetchmail and mutt yet? :)
--
Kirk
On 24 Sep 2002, Kirk Strauser wrote:
PS - And that reminds me! Why am I still ssh'ing someplace and running
pine when I could be running xpine and (probably) POP3s'ing my mail to my box!!!
Because you haven't discovered fetchmail and mutt yet? :)
Kirk Strauser
Is mutt a lot like PINE?
In the last episode (Sep 23), Peter Leftwich said:
I wonder... with majordomo's and mail lists in general, when someone
replies and modifies the Subject line, is the thread broken and future
search engine results dissociated? Or do threads rely on Message-ID
codes in the full headers? Yes I
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
It's up to your email client (not the mailinglist) to thread messages,
and the algorithm most use is to thread messages together based on
References: and In-Reply-To: headers, and optionally tack leftover
messages into those threads based on the subject
