Re: Drivers Required
Marc Ravenor wrote: Does anyone have drivers for an Intel 82801FR sata host controller? I have a customer using FreeBSD V 4.11 loaded on an HP DL 320 G4 server and he cannot see the drives. FreeBSD 4.11 is obsolete and unsupported. Maybe you will find an appropriate driver in/for FreeBSD 5.X or FreeBSD 6.X. Gabor Kovesdan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drivers Required
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 16:40 +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: Marc Ravenor wrote: Does anyone have drivers for an Intel 82801FR sata host controller? I have a customer using FreeBSD V 4.11 loaded on an HP DL 320 G4 server and he cannot see the drives. FreeBSD 4.11 is obsolete and unsupported. Maybe you will find an appropriate driver in/for FreeBSD 5.X or FreeBSD 6.X. Gabor Kovesdan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc, You can find information on supported hardware via this page: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/index.html The beast appears to to a SATA raid controller. A quick search of the mail archives indicates that the controller maybe supported by 5.0 and later. As Gabor has suggested try a later version - 6.0 looks good Good Luck Rob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drivers Hardware
On Monday 13 June 2005 16:20, Juan Palacios wrote: bought LINSPIRE and it installed everything except modem, tried over 3 modems and NOTHING. Most cheap modems are winmodems. These are modems that offload a lot of the signal processing from hardware into drivers. The drivers are typically windows only, hence the name winmodems. I understand there has been a lot of progress in making winmodems work under Linux (see http://linmodems.org ), but things are a lot easier if you use a proper hardware modem. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drivers Hardware
Hola Juan. You have a very automatized FreeBSD style system here: http://www.pcbsd.org/ I hope this can be useful for you and others. Regards. Jose. -- http://www.lordofunix.org Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. Registered BSD User 51101. Registered Linux User #213309. Memories. You are talking about memories. Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obese mail messages (was: Re: drivers)
On 30 May 2005 at 10:03, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Monday, 30 May 2005 at 9:39:04 +0930, Tim Aslat wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:26 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please don't. I agree. Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me personally $2.00 to download this message. Knowing what kind of setup you have Greg, I can believe that. Although it has opened up a rather large can of worms. Can the list maintainers restrict message sizes to less than a meg? I honestly can't imagine any possible reason for sending an attachment larger than 500K (shar files, etc) to a public mailing list. Is it worth looking into doing this, or am I barking up the wrong metaphor? I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. If this is the first time it's happened, then setting a 1 MB (or 2 MB) limit won't affect many people, nor will it affect anyone you don't want to affect. I think a limit is quite reasonable. If someone on the list has something really large to send, he or she can always offer it first, and then only those truly interested will reply and can get it directly, off list, saving the rest of the list membership the time and expense. -- Jerry Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
On Sunday 29 May 2005 07:40 pm, Tim Aslat wrote: I propose that we decide on a realistic size limit for freebsd-* mailing lists. My suggestion is 500K. I use the Mailman mailing list handler, and it includes an option to require moderator approval for messages larger than some configurable size. Would this be a reasonable option for the FreeBSD lists? I'd hate to reject all large messages just because we can't imagine a need for it at the moment, but I certainly understand the need to limit them as much as possible. -- Kirk Strauser pgpVGfRHKDekb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: drivers
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:29 -0300, Augusto Tobías Bierwerth wrote: First of all I must admit that I was doubting whether to send this e-mail to this address or to the one for nOObs. I was considering to install FreeBSD but as far as I know, not every hardware supports every Op. Sys. At the moment, I am a Windows XP Professional Edition SP1 user, but I can't stand its slowness anymore. I am sending as an attachment a .txt file which contains information about my computer. It would be great if you sent any link to a site concerning the subject (drivers!!!) or any explanation that could help. Thank you in advance, Tobías Bierwerth [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would suggest that you NEVER ever attach such a large file to an email and send it to a public mailing list, I bet there are not many people who like it. Secondly, the attachment is more or less filled with junk and I doubt that there are many people who read it from start to end, so either you give a brief summary of your system or ... better: visit the following links and read up the important information concerning your matter on your own. Should you encounter any problems AFTER you have read though them, people will be more than helpful solving them with you. http://www.freebsd.org/ http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html http://www.freebsd.org/projects/newbies.html Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: drivers
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 03:17:30PM +0200, Andreas Rudisch wrote: I would suggest that you NEVER ever attach such a large file to an email and send it to a public mailing list, I bet there are not many people who like it. Especially those on a dialup account! Better make a short summary of the information. Secondly, the attachment is more or less filled with junk and I doubt that there are many people who read it from start to end According to file(1) it's UTF-16. The following command made it readable: iconv -c -f UTF-16 -t ISO_8859-1 Report.txt report.txt At a glance, the hardware looks compatible with FreeBSD, although I don't know about the webcam. Roland -- R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt pgpEKR41bhz5R.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: drivers
On Friday, 27 May 2005 at 19:29:39 -0300, Augusto Tobas Bierwerth wrote: First of all I must admit that I was doubting whether to send this e-mail to this address or to the one for nOObs. Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please don't. I was considering to install FreeBSD but as far as I know, not every hardware supports every Op. Sys. At the moment, I am a Windows XP Professional Edition SP1 user, but I can't stand its slowness anymore. I am sending as an attachment a .txt file which contains information about my computer. Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me personally $2.00 to download this message. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgpV68RecdUVI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: drivers
On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:26 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please don't. I agree. Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me personally $2.00 to download this message. Knowing what kind of setup you have Greg, I can believe that. Although it has opened up a rather large can of worms. Can the list maintainers restrict message sizes to less than a meg? I honestly can't imagine any possible reason for sending an attachment larger than 500K (shar files, etc) to a public mailing list. Is it worth looking into doing this, or am I barking up the wrong metaphor? Regards Tim -- Tim Aslat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au Phone: +61 8 84193434 Mobile: +61 0401088479 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
On Monday, 30 May 2005 at 9:39:04 +0930, Tim Aslat wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:26 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please don't. I agree. Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me personally $2.00 to download this message. Knowing what kind of setup you have Greg, I can believe that. Although it has opened up a rather large can of worms. Can the list maintainers restrict message sizes to less than a meg? I honestly can't imagine any possible reason for sending an attachment larger than 500K (shar files, etc) to a public mailing list. Is it worth looking into doing this, or am I barking up the wrong metaphor? I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgprj5gzU1Su8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: drivers
On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:03:03 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. Maybe it's the first, but I'm guessing it won't be the last. Now that people have seen its possible, we can probably expect some individuals to gain some small amusement by sending huge attachments to the list. I propose that we decide on a realistic size limit for freebsd-* mailing lists. My suggestion is 500K. Regards Tim -- Tim Aslat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au Phone: +61 8 84193434 Mobile: +61 0401088479 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
On Sunday 29 May 2005 17:40, the author Tim Aslat contributed to the dialogue on- Re: drivers: On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:03:03 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. Maybe it's the first, but I'm guessing it won't be the last. Now that people have seen its possible, we can probably expect some individuals to gain some small amusement by sending huge attachments to the list. I propose that we decide on a realistic size limit for freebsd-* mailing lists. My suggestion is 500K. For what its worth could I suggest an intermediate course -- if it happens again then put a limit - I suppose I am wondering whether quick action on isolated cases does not lead to bad precedents!! It strikes me as going down the slippery slope towards over regulation -- I dunno I suggest it be slept on My two pennorth David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May/June bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
On Sunday, 29 May 2005 at 17:53:14 -0700, Vizion wrote: On Sunday 29 May 2005 17:40, the author Tim Aslat contributed to the dialogue on- Re: drivers: On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:03:03 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. Maybe it's the first, but I'm guessing it won't be the last. Now that people have seen its possible, we can probably expect some individuals to gain some small amusement by sending huge attachments to the list. I propose that we decide on a realistic size limit for freebsd-* mailing lists. My suggestion is 500K. For what its worth could I suggest an intermediate course -- if it happens again then put a limit - I suppose I am wondering whether quick action on isolated cases does not lead to bad precedents!! It strikes me as going down the slippery slope towards over regulation -- I dunno I suggest it be slept on In fact, what you're suggesting is more regulation. Intelligent, yes, but it means more work. I've sent a message to the FreeBSD postmaster suggesting a limit of 100 kB. My reasoning for this relatively low limit: nobody's going to look at much more anyway, and it will encourage people to quote carefully :-) Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgpY7qjbwKgs7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Posting limitation or not? [was Re: drivers]
On Sunday 29 May 2005 18:03, the author Greg 'groggy' Lehey contributed to the dialogue on- Re: drivers: On Sunday, 29 May 2005 at 17:53:14 -0700, Vizion wrote: On Sunday 29 May 2005 17:40, the author Tim Aslat contributed to the dialogue on- Re: drivers: On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:03:03 +0930 Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. Maybe it's the first, but I'm guessing it won't be the last. Now that people have seen its possible, we can probably expect some individuals to gain some small amusement by sending huge attachments to the list. I propose that we decide on a realistic size limit for freebsd-* mailing lists. My suggestion is 500K. For what its worth could I suggest an intermediate course -- if it happens again then put a limit - I suppose I am wondering whether quick action on isolated cases does not lead to bad precedents!! It strikes me as going down the slippery slope towards over regulation -- I dunno I suggest it be slept on In fact, what you're suggesting is more regulation. Intelligent, yes, but it means more work. I do not see how it can be more regulation to not bring in a regulation as a knee jerk reaction. I've sent a message to the FreeBSD postmaster suggesting a limit of 100 kB. My reasoning for this relatively low limit: nobody's going to look at much more anyway, and it will encourage people to quote carefully :-) I dunno -- I think what was in the back of my mind is the fact there are far tooopoo many cases of people NOT providing enuf information - that causes everyone more problems than people providing too much information.. My two pennorth Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May/June bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
On Sunday 29 May 2005 18:52, the author Lars Eighner contributed to the dialogue on- Re: drivers: Postmaster at freebsd org says that limit is 200k (this one slipped through) and the current discussion of this subject is off topic for technical lists. That is good enuf 4 me david -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May/June bound for Europe via Panama Canal. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I've sent a message to the FreeBSD postmaster suggesting a limit of 100 kB. My reasoning for this relatively low limit: nobody's going to look at much more anyway, and it will encourage people to quote carefully :-) I'm still wondering what could possibly have been in 9 megs that could conceivably be call a text file about system specification (even at two-bytes per character). Did it specify every molecule in the system? Look, maintainers may indeed be interested in dumps that exceed 100kB, but there is no reason to post stuff like that to a public mailing list. If there is anything that has to be that big or bigger for some reason, stick on the web and provide a link. It may not be any faster to download for people with slow links, but most browsers will give you some idea what you are getting. And people who know they have slow links may elect not to help anyone with 9 megs of problems. -- Lars Eighner [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drivers
Deenan Vythilingam wrote: Hi where can I learn to write drievers for freebsd Look here: http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html#books ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drivers for leadtek winfast tv 2000 xp?
jason dictos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are there drivers in FreeBSD for TV Input tuner cards such as the winfast tv 2000 xp? (This may be an ATI oem board). There are drivers for the Meteor and Brooktree chip sets. I have no idea what that card uses. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drivers for canon
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 18:09, Serge Terryn wrote: My friend has a canon S520 printer. Any idea which driver to use under apsfilter ? http://www.linuxprinting.org Although the website seems to be down at the moment, it has all the answers you seek. Try back in a little while. -- Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
