Re: freebsd-update vs. make buildworld

2006-10-27 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:27:56 -0700 Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, the version of FreeBSD Update which is now in the base system (starting with 6.2-BETA1) supports upgrading the world, kernel, and source code separately, so on systems with custom kernel configurations you'll be

Re: freebsd-update vs. make buildworld

2006-10-26 Thread Colin Percival
Paul Schmehl wrote: I use both methods; freebsd-update when I'm using a GENERIC kernel with no changes and the traditional method when the source has been altered, the kernel is customized or the processor is not supported under freebsd-update. FWIW, the version of FreeBSD Update which is

Re: freebsd-update vs. make buildworld

2006-10-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On October 26, 2006 12:52:35 AM +0200 Niek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi experts, Due to the recent security issue regarding openssl, I have to update a server running 6_release. I was wondering if updating using binaries using the freebsd-update utility is a viable alternative to recompiling

Re: freebsd-update vs. make buildworld

2006-10-25 Thread Lane
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 19:23, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On October 26, 2006 12:52:35 AM +0200 Niek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi experts, Due to the recent security issue regarding openssl, I have to update a server running 6_release. I was wondering if updating using binaries using the