Scott Long wrote this message on Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:35 -0600:
> FreeBSD. Making big statements in public that they don't, or that it's
> not up to ones' standards or hopes, isn't terribly useful or productive.
> I'd hate for FreeBSD to turn into That Other BSD that publically abuses
> and har
Hi, Scott!
> Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
> EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
I only stated that according to ICP Vortex Germany the
GDT products are EOE and ICP Vortex will not provide an
updated driver for FreeBSD. Nothing m
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Second, various Adaptec sources have confirmed that they do support
FreeBSD.
There are new drivers for the 22300SLP for example (though one person
replied to me privately and said they crash all the time). However,
what they claim as support
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
First, the iir driver is being worked on when the need arises. Several
bugs were fixed in it a few months ago, and until Ma
Ok guys, time for a small breather here. All these claims about
EoE and orphanage and whatnot are a bit premature and underinformed.
First, the iir driver is being worked on when the need arises. Several
bugs were fixed in it a few months ago, and until Mark's recent series
of mails on it, no ot
Hello!
> 'k, just to clarify here ... the new products won't be based on the iir(4)
> driver then?
Yes, they won't.
> Basically, should the iir(4) driver be considered EOE also?
As far as Adaptec and ICP Vortex are concerned, yes. Since the
driver is Open Source, there is no enforced EOE, just