Re: linux_base-c6 && Skype 4.2

[Jerry]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:09:35 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:

> M$ has Linux Skype 4.2 for some Linux distributions, for example for
> F16; would it be possible to run one of these distributions on top of
> linux_base-c6? Is there any work in progress I could support?
> I have enough systems at home running some 10-CURRENT and could use
> one of them for additional tests/work

According to the web site, these are the minimum requirements for a
Linux version of Skype 4.2.0.11

Skype for Linux

1 GHz processor or faster.
256 MB RAM.
100 MB free disk space on your hard drive.
Video card driver with Xv support.
Either a built-in or external microphone is required for voice calls.
An internet connection – broadband is best (GPRS is not supported for voice 
calls).
Qt 4.7 • D-Bus 1.0.0
libasound2 1.0.18
PulseAudio 1.0 (optional)
BlueZ 4.0.0 (optional)

I saw a post, I think it was SlashDot, that the FreeBSD kernel was not
robust enough to handle Skype. You might want to talk to the
developers. You can always download a clean distribution of Skype
from the web site and experiment with it.


-- 
Jerry ♔

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary

[Boris Samorodov]

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:54:05 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote:

> I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires 
> shared X libraries:


> >nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot 
> >  open shared object file: No such file or directory

This library is a part of x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 port.

> >error while loading shared libraries: libXt.so.6: cannot open shared 
> > object file: No such file or directory

> I've tried to install x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs port

Good.

> but brandelf tells me 

As I've wrote at my previuos email, brandelf should be used
only with binary executives. Don't use it for libraries.
You have been warned! ;-)

> they are BSD-binaries incompatible with my linux stuff. And thus my app
> can't start complaining on incompatibilities if I tune lib paths.

You should not tweak paths untill absolutely needed (and if you
really understand what you do). Lunuxulator should DRT if a needed
library is present. In case of errors submit them here (or better
even to freebsd-emulation@ ML, since more people may help there).

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary

[Jeff Laine]

On Fri,28-08-2009 [14:57:04], Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote:
> 
> > I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some 
> > rpm-based applications.
> > Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd 
> > rpm 
> > binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But 
> > there's 
> > no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD
> 
> FreeBSD has it's own package manager and it is used to track
> all ports (linux ports as well). So we don't use linux rpm
> database (it is not supported). Said that I might add that it
> doesn't mean that this won't work if you try. But you'll be at 
> your own here.
> 
> If you need to install a linux rpm archieve you should do
> as root:
> # cd /compat/linux
> # rpm2cpio -q < linux.rpm.archieve | cpio -id
> Then brandelf any binary executable (not libraries!).
> 
> Sure you won't be able to do a clean uninstall. But that
> may help you to do your tests.
> 
> The best way is to create an apropriate port and use it.
> Creating a linux port is not hard task. Please take a look
> at the ports tree (audio ports may be a good starting points
> as examples).
> 
> HTH
> 
> > I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree.
> 
> BTW, I'm sure you have read /usr/ports/UPDATING and do have an
> apropriate variables at /etc/make.conf. ;-)
> 

Sure, I did. ;) Thanks for the answer, I've used cpio to unpack my rpms.


And another related question if you don't mind. 

I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires 
shared X libraries:


>nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot 
>  open shared object file: No such file or directory
>error while loading shared libraries: libXt.so.6: cannot open shared 
> object file: No such file or directory

I've tried to install x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs port but brandelf tells me 
they are BSD-binaries incompatible with my linux stuff. And thus my app
can't start complaining on incompatibilities if I tune lib paths.

Any hints?

TIA.






-- 
Best regards,
Jeff

| "Nobody wants to say how this works.  |
|  Maybe nobody knows ..."  |
|   Xorg.conf(5)|
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary

[Boris Samorodov]

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote:

> I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some 
> rpm-based applications.
> Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm 
> binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But 
> there's 
> no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD

FreeBSD has it's own package manager and it is used to track
all ports (linux ports as well). So we don't use linux rpm
database (it is not supported). Said that I might add that it
doesn't mean that this won't work if you try. But you'll be at 
your own here.

If you need to install a linux rpm archieve you should do
as root:
# cd /compat/linux
# rpm2cpio -q < linux.rpm.archieve | cpio -id
Then brandelf any binary executable (not libraries!).

Sure you won't be able to do a clean uninstall. But that
may help you to do your tests.

The best way is to create an apropriate port and use it.
Creating a linux port is not hard task. Please take a look
at the ports tree (audio ports may be a good starting points
as examples).

HTH

> I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree.

BTW, I'm sure you have read /usr/ports/UPDATING and do have an
apropriate variables at /etc/make.conf. ;-)

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base question

[Boris Samorodov]

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:43:22 +1000 Da Rock wrote:

> If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports?

Well, just what they are: ports for Fedora Core 6, Fedora 7 and
Fedora 8.

> Do the libraries change?

Sure, some libraries changes did occure. At least minor versions
were. A more detailed information you may discover the differencies
looking at makefiles and pkg-plist files.

> Supporting software?

Hw, compat.linux.osrelease should be set to 2.6.16.

> Can freebsd effectively emulate any kernel version?

No, the default is 2.4.2 and a planned one (not default and not fully
supported, but in a good shape so far) is 2.6.16.


WBR
-- 
bsam
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base question

[Boris Samorodov]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:03:45 -0800 Chris wrote:

> I just updated ports and have the following shown
> linux_base-f7
> linux_base-f8

I'd use this one if you cat't use linux_base-fc4. AFAIC this port has a
fixed libc which works better with linuxulator. Please read
/usr/ports/UPDATING for more information about non-default linux base
ports (linux_base-6,7,8).

You can't use FreeBSD-6.x though.

> linux_base-fc4
> linux_base-fc6
> (and several Gentoo)


WBR
-- 
bsam
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base question

[Da Rock]

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 09:07 +0100, Mel wrote:
> On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote:
> > I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the
> > late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server
> > running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux.
> >
> > It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux
> > implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port
> > to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the
> > linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out:
> >
> > CentOS 5
> > Debian (Lenny)
> > Fedora 6 / 7 / 8
> > Mandriva
> > OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3
> > Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0
> >
> > Here are the components needed.
> >
> > Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
> > Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
> > Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
> > Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer
> >
> > Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to
> > attempt to run these two daemons.
> >
> > I just updated ports and have the following shown
> > linux_base-f7
> > linux_base-f8
> > linux_base-fc4
> > linux_base-fc6
> > (and several Gentoo)
> 
> On 6.x, use fc4.
> On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the 
> default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know).
> 
> You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems 
> and testing by the emulation team.

Sorry to butt in here, but I've suffered similar confusion. In some
blogs or wikis it mentions setting the sysctl compat.linux.osrelease to
either 2.4.2 or 2.6.16, and (in some of my fiddling during tests) I've
found I can actually set the kernel settings to suit pretty much any
software that needs to run.

If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports? Do the
libraries change? Supporting software? Can freebsd effectively emulate
any kernel version?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base question

[Chris]

On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Mel wrote:


On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote:

I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the
late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server
running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux.

It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux
implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port
to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the
linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out:

CentOS 5
Debian (Lenny)
Fedora 6 / 7 / 8
Mandriva
OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3
Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0

Here are the components needed.

Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer

Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to
attempt to run these two daemons.

I just updated ports and have the following shown
linux_base-f7
linux_base-f8
linux_base-fc4
linux_base-fc6
(and several Gentoo)


On 6.x, use fc4.
On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which  
will be the

default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know).

You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in  
production systems

and testing by the emulation team.


Great, thanks! Just to make sure, did you mean
compat.linux.osrelease
without the underscore. Didn't find the other sysctl.


--
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- 
unsubscr...@freebsd.org"




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base question

[Mel]

On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote:
> I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the
> late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server
> running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux.
>
> It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux
> implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port
> to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the
> linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out:
>
> CentOS 5
> Debian (Lenny)
> Fedora 6 / 7 / 8
> Mandriva
> OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3
> Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0
>
> Here are the components needed.
>
> Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer
> Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer
> Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer
> Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer
>
> Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to
> attempt to run these two daemons.
>
> I just updated ports and have the following shown
> linux_base-f7
> linux_base-f8
> linux_base-fc4
> linux_base-fc6
> (and several Gentoo)

On 6.x, use fc4.
On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the 
default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know).

You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems 
and testing by the emulation team.
-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux_base and SMP support ?

[Kris Kennaway]

P.Moulin wrote:


Hi there.

I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux
setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers).

The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...)
where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core,
now, with linux-crunchers, the 2 crunchers are sharing only 1 core.

Can someone tell me what's wrong with this ?  Have I missed something ?
Is it an incompatibility from linux_base with smp hardware ?

This problem seems to affects only freebsd 6.x, not the 7 branch.
My kernels are all compiled with SMP support.

I'm working for years with freebsd, but consider I'm really a newbee
with linux.


How do you know they are sharing one core, and what do you mean by "2 
crunchers"?  Are they separate processes, or a single threaded process?


Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4_9 install problem

[Boris Samorodov]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:24:46 +0300 Adrian Vraciu wrote:

> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
> ===> Extracting for linux_base-fc-4_9
> ===> linux_base-fc-4_9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/rpm2cpio - found
> error reading header from package
> /usr/bin/cpio: premature end of archive
> *** Error code 1

> how can i fix that?

How did you install the port? What if you do a make checksum at the
port (you didn't show that output):
-
# cd /usr/ports/emulation/linux_base-fc4
# make checksum
-

WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Pietro Cerutti]

On 6/21/06, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
> > before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so?
> >
> > And, please, show your:
> > $ ldd `which skype_bin`
>
>
> hi Boris,
>
> thx you solved :)

So can I consider that it works OK and skip tonight's testing session ?


No please:

ldd `which skype_bin`

/usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin:
/usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries:
/usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
/usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: exit status 127
Exit 1









--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #177:








--
Pietro Cerutti
ICQ: 117293691
PGP: 0x9571F78E

- ASCII Ribbon Campaign -
against HTML e-mail and
proprietary attachments
  www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[IOnut]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
> > before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so?
> > 
> > And, please, show your:
> > $ ldd `which skype_bin`
> 
> 
> hi Boris,
> 
> thx you solved :)

So can I consider that it works OK and skip tonight's testing session ?


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #177:




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Martin Wilke]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
> before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so?
> 
> And, please, show your:
> $ ldd `which skype_bin`


hi Boris,

thx you solved :)

Martin 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
> > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
> > > 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> > > skype_bin: error while loading shared
> > > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 
> > 
> > On a quick try, no.
> > 
> > I'll look into it thing night.

> it does not work correctly under current.

Just tested on amd64-current (aprox. 10 days ago), works fine.


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote:

> someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> skype_bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 

Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr
before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so?

And, please, show your:
$ ldd `which skype_bin`


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[IOnut]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
> > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi forks, 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
> > > 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> > > skype_bin: error while loading shared
> > > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 
> > 
> > On a quick try, no.
> > 
> > I'll look into it thing night.
> 
> Ok thx, 
> 
> it does not work correctly under current.

Hmm, I have no current to test on.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

You are an excellent tactician, Captain.  You let your second in
command attack while you sit and watch for weakness.
-- Khan Noonian Singh, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Martin Wilke]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300
Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
> Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi forks, 
> > 
> > 
> > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> > skype_bin: error while loading shared
> > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 
> 
> On a quick try, no.
> 
> I'll look into it thing night.
> 
> 

Ok thx, 

it does not work correctly under current.

Martin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Martin Wilke]

Hi forks, 


someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
skype_bin: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[IOnut]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200
Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi forks, 
> 
> 
> someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
> skype_bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 

On a quick try, no.

I'll look into it thing night.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #85:
Never let the competition know what you're thinking.
-- ST: Legends of the Ferengi




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Martin Wilke]

Hi forks, 


someone has the same problems with skype after the update ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype
skype_bin: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:11:33 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 
> > +0400):
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
> > >> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> > >> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Here it is.
> > >> >
> > >> > Looks OK:
> > >> > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781
> > >
> > >> Should I commit ?
> > >
> > > Alexander, would you mind?
> 
> > No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-)
> 
> OK. Ion-Mihai, will you please be so kind to commit the patch?
> Thanks.

Commited.

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #60:
system has been recalled


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 
> +0400):
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
> >> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> >> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> >> > >
> >> > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> >> > >
> >> > > Here it is.
> >> >
> >> > Looks OK:
> >> > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781
> >
> >> Should I commit ?
> >
> > Alexander, would you mind?

> No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-)

OK. Ion-Mihai, will you please be so kind to commit the patch?
Thanks.


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Alexander Leidinger]

Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 
+0400):


On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:


On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> >
> > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> >
> > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> >
> > Here it is.
>
> Looks OK:
> http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781



Should I commit ?


Alexander, would you mind?


No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-)

Bye,
Alexander.

P.S.: I see Boris as one of currently two people which can be  
described as maintainers of the emulation@ owned ports. And I'm  
nagging portmgr to get a commit bit for him. Additionally there's no  
lock on emulation@ owned ports (except the usual "hands of if you do  
not really know what you are doing", and the linux infrastructure has  
a lot of pitfalls...).


--
Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR
you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org   netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Pietro Cerutti]

Hi Guys,
sorry for top-posting, but I don't really know where to add this:

I still have problems with acroread7, even after the update to
linux_base-fc-4_2 and linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_4:

/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error
while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libm.so.6: ELF file OS ABI
invalid

Any ideas?

Thank you!


On 6/20/06, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> > >
> > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> > >
> > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> > >
> > > Here it is.
> >
> > Looks OK:
> > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781

> Should I commit ?

Alexander, would you mind?


WBR
--
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"




--
Pietro Cerutti
ICQ: 117293691
PGP: 0x9571F78E

- ASCII Ribbon Campaign -
against HTML e-mail and
proprietary attachments
  www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> > > 
> > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> > > 
> > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> > > 
> > > Here it is.
> > 
> > Looks OK:
> > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781

> Should I commit ?

Alexander, would you mind?


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300
Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> > 
> > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> > 
> > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> > 
> > Here it is.
> 
> Looks OK:
> http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781

Should I commit ?

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #253:
We've run out of licenses


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> > 
> > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> > 
> > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> > 
> > Here it is.

> Looks OK:
> http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781

Great, thanks!


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[IOnut]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> 
> > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> 
> > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
> 
> Here it is.

Looks OK:
http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #28:
CPU radiator broken




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:14:43 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:

> > diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
> > --- pkg-plist   2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 -   1.4
> > +++ pkg-plist   19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
> > @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
> >  usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
> >  usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
> >  usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7
> > +usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so
> > +usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
> > +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2

> Ah, this was missing from my pkg-plist. I did not test the port's
> uninstall.

Yep, this file is not located at rpm-file. Maybe it is created as a
link, say, when running linux ldconfig.

> > +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> >  usr/lib/libttf.so.2
> >  usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0
> >  usr/lib/libz.so.1


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Adi Pircalabu]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:

> diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
> --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 -   1.4
> +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
> @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
>  usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
>  usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
>  usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7
> +usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so
> +usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
> +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2

Ah, this was missing from my pkg-plist. I did not test the port's
uninstall.
Thanks Boris!

> +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
>  usr/lib/libttf.so.2
>  usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0
>  usr/lib/libz.so.1


-- 
Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E)


-- 
This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender.
For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:

> /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)

> Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.

Here it is.


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile	10 Jun 2006 13:35:52 -	1.7
+++ Makefile	19 Jun 2006 10:39:12 -
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 PORTNAME=		fc
 PORTVERSION=		4
-PORTREVISION=		1
+PORTREVISION=		2
 CATEGORIES=		emulators linux
 MASTER_SITES=		${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX}
 MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=	${PORTVERSION}/${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}/os/Fedora/RPMS \
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 		bzip2-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		bzip2-libs-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
+		compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
Index: distinfo.i386
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 distinfo.i386
--- distinfo.i386	2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 -	1.6
+++ distinfo.i386	19 Jun 2006 10:39:12 -
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
 MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 4351cbd58365904bc2a21c946b624837
 SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = c1ec3e21db3d4ef616ce78dcf2913508fdea6b70b674267af0f0d180428fda8b
 SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 859566
+MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 3f002b614c92079a32a30eaa721aba58
+SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 0f4d0394c4f746bfc6418e8fd6b46a496f742a16d4bb96589cbe56b4975f94fd
+SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 178657
 MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = dab411528a710a5f61e1981f173beddc
 SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 1b07f3d0c61b5a4737ac7d007485d04b7d51a00476924d5dc399a1fa347376ac
 SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 233643
Index: pkg-plist
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/pkg-plist,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
--- pkg-plist	2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 -	1.4
+++ pkg-plist	19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
@@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7
+usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so
+usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
+usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
+usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
 usr/lib/libttf.so.2
 usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0
 usr/lib/libz.so.1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[IOnut]

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:42:54 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> > (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
> > > 
> > > > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
> > > > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is
> > > > HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does
> > > > anyone know how to fix this?
> > > > 
> > > > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries:
> > > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
> > > > file or directory
> > > 
> > > Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux
> > > libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against
> > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3.
> > > Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost,
> > > linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the
> > > port.
> 
> > Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it
> > and see if it fixes the dependency problem?
> 
> Adi, you did the right thing -- that library is missing at the port.
> There are two hints.
> 
> 1. The plist file is not full (one llibrary missing). I'd recommend
>you to test the patches (on probably fresh machine). Then on
>deinstalling you'll notice those files that remain undeletted.
>You may consider reading
>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/
>and 
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html
>to create a good (i.e. ready-to-commit) patches.

/me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)

Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #141:
disks spinning backwards - toggle the hemisphere jumper




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Boris Samorodov]

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
> > 
> > > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
> > > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is
> > > HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does
> > > anyone know how to fix this?
> > > 
> > > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries:
> > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
> > > file or directory
> > 
> > Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux
> > libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against
> > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3.
> > Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost,
> > linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the
> > port.

> Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it
> and see if it fixes the dependency problem?

Adi, you did the right thing -- that library is missing at the port.
There are two hints.

1. The plist file is not full (one llibrary missing). I'd recommend
   you to test the patches (on probably fresh machine). Then on
   deinstalling you'll notice those files that remain undeletted.
   You may consider reading
   http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/
   and 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html
   to create a good (i.e. ready-to-commit) patches.

2. To create a good distinfo file for a linux port try to use "make
   PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES makesum". There are may source files (under
   GPL) which we must (at least) have while building linux (GPL)
   ports.

PS. I've already sent Jeff a patch and he gave me a successful
feedback. I hope this patch will be committed soon.


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Adi Pircalabu]

(Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
> 
> > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
> > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is
> > HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does
> > anyone know how to fix this?
> > 
> > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries:
> > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
> > file or directory
> 
> Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux
> libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3.
> Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost,
> linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the
> port.

Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it
and see if it fixes the dependency problem?

Cheers

-- 
Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E)
diff -urN /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile	Sat Jun 10 16:35:52 2006
+++ /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/Makefile	Mon Jun 19 19:04:57 2006
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 PORTNAME=		fc
 PORTVERSION=		4
-PORTREVISION=		1
+PORTREVISION=		2
 CATEGORIES=		emulators linux
 MASTER_SITES=		${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX}
 MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=	${PORTVERSION}/${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}/os/Fedora/RPMS \
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 		bzip2-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		bzip2-libs-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
+		compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
 		db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
diff -urN /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386
--- /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386	Fri Jun  2 23:50:32 2006
+++ /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386	Mon Jun 19 19:04:57 2006
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
 MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 4351cbd58365904bc2a21c946b624837
 SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = c1ec3e21db3d4ef616ce78dcf2913508fdea6b70b674267af0f0d180428fda8b
 SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 859566
+MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 3f002b614c92079a32a30eaa721aba58
+SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 0f4d0394c4f746bfc6418e8fd6b46a496f742a16d4bb96589cbe56b4975f94fd
+SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 178657
 MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = dab411528a710a5f61e1981f173beddc
 SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 1b07f3d0c61b5a4737ac7d007485d04b7d51a00476924d5dc399a1fa347376ac
 SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 233643
@@ -100,87 +103,3 @@
 MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 7222e84cfa404931ff11e5e4b3edad5e
 SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 904382b92317044565f8951f67700db60c86bacad659f3e0050c1dffa401fe70
 SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 49500
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = d928e0cc1c629716aefc843ff150eec6
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = 9c809619bf56d59d6cad2620d40b0b5356e77aa0045b928ad2a6e977150a3b3b
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = 3638
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 691751a30e991d536b262a27784de212
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 996dd5ea6ddc997b2ff700b6f854a62355295f7ca9506e1cdc0c8004ecf12372
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 4479090
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = 4f35fd36a4977bea9985015bf0f1515e
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = cd5b82e1331bf7be636ce8ee3720de4261983ddd00bf51f9eb3048161169bcc4
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = 677935
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 6072a40a834c5d29f4d88454a234d52a
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 7c92a659930984682a6704ce40bff3919d1e87a5be3e9d534a42148761c1cb76
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 7176462
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 42624b59a9843f09184d017a2ce4f397
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 8aa024c536905da47fd580b99df4c80bd85107f151178665a18995cfcf0db277
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 4379037
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = 989c2696624adf5c06d794947c079589
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = ffc33b4429734eb9c7463d278296efdd176650bc4b12f0d7a0ed7ec5819cf64b
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Adi Pircalabu]

(Cc-ed to freebsd-ports@, sorry if anyone's affected by cross-posting)

On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:

> After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications 
> and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive 
> the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to
> fix this?
> 
> ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries:
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or directory

Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux
libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3.
Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost,
linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the port.

-- 
Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E)


-- 
This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender.
For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-fc4

[Frank Steinborn]

Jeff Molofee wrote:
> After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and 
> games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the 
> following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this?
> 
> ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: 
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Try to recompile the programs that aren't running anymore.

HTH; Frank
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-8 fetch & # of ports errors

[Lowell Gilbert]

"Anthony M. Agelastos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE
> box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below.
> Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after
> the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it
> fetched it and built it without problems. Does anyone have any
> suggestions? I checked the archives and did not find anything. I

The servers don't seem to have that RPM, and the ones I checked (from
my copy of the port, which doesn't seem to match yours) had, if
anything, an older version.  I don't know the right place or version;
I'm having a little trouble wandering around the various FTP servers...

> CVSup'd from cvsup13.us if that has anything to do with it. While on
> the topic, I noticed earlier today that when I first issued the
> portupgrade command, it rebuilt the package database and it mentioned
> that there were 13,3xx packages... last time I checked the website it
> listed over 14,000 and I have my cvsup file set to d/l all groups.
> Any ideas? Thank you all for your continued assistance.

I've got a hair over 14000 entries in the ports db this morning.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base install error

[Michael C. Shultz]

On Sunday 31 July 2005 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> installing linux_base and get error:
> /===>   linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found
> Linux mode is not enabled.
> Loading linux kernel module now...
> kldload: can't load linux: Exec format error
> The linux kernel module could not be loaded.
> Please enable linux mode manually and retry.
> /
> I have already added an entry in rc.conf and am running generic kernel
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Maybe your linux.ko module isn't matched with your kernel, do you always
rebuild the modules when you rebuild the kernel?

 -Mike

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike

[Derrick Ryalls]

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:27:14 +0300, roma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At me the same problem as at you, whether was possible to you to solve it?
> 

[Paste from other thread]

>
> I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source
> with freebsd 4.9
>
> Illegal instruction (core dumped)
>
> cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory
>
> Deprecated bfd_read called at
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c
> line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section
>
> Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader.
>
> /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory.
>
> debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file:
>
> email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to
> upgrade to 5.3 ?
>
> Any help would be appreciated!
>

First, make sure you are using linux_compat8 not 7.  If that alone
works, then wonderful.  If not, then the next part depends on what
processor you have.  If you can support MMX/SSE, the enable SSE in
your kernel (off by default in 4.x I believe) and try again.

When CS:S first came out, I had to do the SSE/compat8 thing to get it
working on an Athlon XP box under 4.x, my Athlon XP box that was
running 5.x had no problem once I install compat.  For a long time, I
couldn't run it on my test server (K6-2 350, no SSE possible), but
sometime recently Valve must have fixed it to use old CPUs as well as
it did work the last time I tried.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike

[Derrick Ryalls]

> 
> I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source
> with freebsd 4.9
> 
> Illegal instruction (core dumped)
> 
> cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory
> 
> Deprecated bfd_read called at
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c
> line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section
> 
> Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader.
> 
> /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory.
> 
> debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file:
> 
> email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to
> upgrade to 5.3 ?
> 
> Any help would be appreciated!
> 

First, make sure you are using linux_compat8 not 7.  If that alone
works, then wonderful.  If not, then the next part depends on what
processor you have.  If you can support MMX/SSE, the enable SSE in
your kernel (off by default in 4.x I believe) and try again.

When CS:S first came out, I had to do the SSE/compat8 thing to get it
working on an Athlon XP box under 4.x, my Athlon XP box that was
running 5.x had no problem once I install compat.  For a long time, I
couldn't run it on my test server (K6-2 350, no SSE possible), but
sometime recently Valve must have fixed it to use old CPUs as well as
it did work the last time I tried.

Hope this helps, let me know if it doesn't.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Linux_Base

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:54:51AM -0300, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
> How can you make linux_base-8 the default for FreeBSD 5.3?

It is the default for all versions of FreeBSD, as of a few weeks ago.

Kris


pgp4d2yVQFwOZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:03:54PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote:
> 
> Thanks Kris, unless I've misunderstood...am I at risk
> by using linux_base-6 and if so how can I correct this?

See the URL you gave me.  You have to switch to linux_base-8.  See
/usr/ports/UPDATING.

> #portupgrade -rR linux_base doesn't do anything and
> because of hardware limitations I can't upgrade to a major
> release.

You don't have to do anything to your FreeBSD release.

Kris


pgpnPDscU0TAQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RE: linux_base

[Warner Joseph]

Thanks Kris, unless I've misunderstood...am I at risk
by using linux_base-6 and if so how can I correct this?

#portupgrade -rR linux_base doesn't do anything and
because of hardware limitations I can't upgrade to a major
release.

-Joe


#-Original Message-
#From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:53 PM
#To: Warner Joseph
#Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
#Subject: Re: linux_base
#
#
#On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:44:39PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote:
#> 
#> Hi,
#> 
#> I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question
#> regarding my current install of linux_base
#> 
#> #portupgrade -l "<" doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading
#> but portaudit -a says:
#> 
#> Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6
#> Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities.
#> Reference:
#> 
#<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/ef253f8b#-0727-11d9-b45d
#-000c41e2cdad
#> .html>
#> 
#> I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive
#> but can't find any information regarding how to correct this.
#> 
#> Can anyone point me in the right direction?
#
#linux_base-6 will never have the security vulnerability fixed because
#it's not supported by redhat.  linux_base contains redhat 8.x which is
#also out of support, but does not currently have security problems.
#It will be updated to something more modern after 4.11-RELEASE.
#
#Kris
#
#

---
This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions 
USA, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee(s).  
The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or 
otherwise confidential information.  Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, 
copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful.  If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe 
you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and 
notify the sender by e-mail with a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:44:39PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question
> regarding my current install of linux_base
> 
> #portupgrade -l "<" doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading
> but portaudit -a says:
> 
> Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6
> Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities.
> Reference:
>  .html>
> 
> I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive
> but can't find any information regarding how to correct this.
> 
> Can anyone point me in the right direction?

linux_base-6 will never have the security vulnerability fixed because
it's not supported by redhat.  linux_base contains redhat 8.x which is
also out of support, but does not currently have security problems.
It will be updated to something more modern after 4.11-RELEASE.

Kris



pgplwleXjssTm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-8 mystery

[Matt Navarre]

On Tuesday 02 November 2004 05:32, Bsd B wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question that has really stumped me. I have
> searched far and wide and have found no literature on
> it.
> My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from
> packages?
>
> I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE
> and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type
> "pkg_add -r linux_base-8" and get the following
>
> Error: FTP Unable to get
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/l
>inux_base-8.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
> pkg_add: unable to fetch
> 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/
>linux_base-8.tgz' by URL
>

There's no linux_base-8 package there. In fact I don't see linux_base-8  
packages built for any 4.x (-RELEASE, -STABLE or -CURRENT).
> It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from
> packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can
> point me to some reference or literature explaining
> this mystery?

Packages only exist if someone builds them. The packages in the release 
directory are, I believe, a shapshot of the ports tree at the time the 
release was made. I don't know how often the -STABLE and -CURRENT packages 
are updated or why linux-base-8 isn't in them. I don't see packages for 
5.3-RELEASE or -CURRENT either.

See the note in section 4.4.1 of the handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html
> Cheers
> Bob
>

-- 
"We all enter this world in the same way: naked, screaming,
 and soaked in blood. But if you live your life right, that kind
 of thing doesn't have to stop there." -- Dana Gould
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-8 mystery

[Kris Kennaway]

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:32:51PM +1100, Bsd B wrote:
> Hi, 
> I have a question that has really stumped me. I have
> searched far and wide and have found no literature on
> it.
> My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from
> packages?

The maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED] marked it RESTRICTED because he is
under the impression that distributing the package would violate the
GPL.  You're invited to express to trevor your comments about the
correctness of this.

Kris


pgpidRJDoEE1J.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-8 mystery

[Aaron P. Martinez]

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 19:32, Bsd B wrote:
> Hi, 
> I have a question that has really stumped me. I have
> searched far and wide and have found no literature on
> it.
> My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from
> packages?
> 
> I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE
> and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type
> "pkg_add -r linux_base-8" and get the following
> 
> Error: FTP Unable to get
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz:
> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
> pkg_add: unable to fetch
> 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz'
> by URL
> 
> It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from
> packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can
> point me to some reference or literature explaining
> this mystery?

I'm VERY new to freebsd, but as i understand things, all packages are
ports, but not all ports are packages  (unless you build it yourself of
course)
> Cheers
> Bob


Aaron


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Linux_Base-8 install

[Phillip White]

Did anyone reply to this person with respect to the below?  I've tried
e-mailing him directly but am getting a failure in doing so.

I have the exact same set up as he and am experiencing the same.


Thursday, November 27, 2003, 12:04:43 PM, you wrote:

MP> I'm running 4.7 Release on one of my systems and am trying to install the
MP> linux_base-8 from ports. It's failing with the following error:

===>>   linux_base-8-8.0_1 depends on executable: rpm - found
MP> kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3
MP> glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6.i386.rpm
MP> /usr/sbin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Invalid argument
MP> execution of glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6 script failed, exit status 1
MP> *** Error code 1

MP> Has anyone run into this before?

MP> --

MP> Micheal Patterson
MP> Network Administration
MP> Cancer Care Network
MP> 405-917-0600


MP> ___
MP> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
MP> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
MP> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


-- 
Best regards,
 Phillipmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Linux_Base 8

[Matthew Seaman]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:42:59AM -0800, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
> I'm running FBSD4.9 release and I'd like to use
> linux_base 8 instead of 7 but when you install a port
> that requires the linux emulator it automatically
> installs linux_base 7 what do I need to do to change
> this to linux_base 8?

Generally all you need to do is delete the linux_base 7 stuff and
install linux_base 8 before you attempt to install anything that would
depend on the linux_base port.

Ports don't fulfil their dependencies by checking that a particular
other port has been installed. Rather they check for the presence of a
particular file (often a shared library).  Only if that file isn't
found then they will attempt to install a port that provides what is
required.  However, in many cases there are several ports that could
fulfil the dependency, and if one of those is already installed things
should just work with that.

If you're a portupgrade(1) user, you should run pkgdb(1) to fix up the
dependencies recorded for the installed packages.  That's just
bookkeeping, and doesn't affect the day to day operation of the
system, although it does make it simpler to upgrade ports later on.
Also look at the ALT_PKGDEP array in pkgtools.conf as a way of
automatically recording the modified dependency in newly installed
ports.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base

[Lowell Gilbert]

Scott Ballantyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > Scott Ballantyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > If I'm running multi-user (as toor), the build stops when installing
> > > glibc. In linux_base, there's actually a coredump, in linux_base-8, it
> > > just stops. This happens even running the GENERIC kernel (I had
> > > previously thought it was perhaps related to a custom kernel).
> > > 
> > > However, if I drop to single user mode, and make install, it
> > > completes, although I get many of the following error messages
> > > intended for syslogd:
> > > 
> > > linux: syscall mmap2 (obsolete or not implemented (pid = )
> > 
> > What version of FreeBSD?  
> > Do you have linux(8) running when you try the install?
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I should have included this: FreeBSD 4.8-p3. Linux.ko isn't
> running. For various reasons, I needed to compile the kernel with it
> included.

linux.ko is the kernel module; you do need that, but for linux
emulation you also need linux(8).  Enabling it by default can be done
by setting linux_enable in rc.conf(5).

I'm not sure if you need the linux emulation running to install
linux_base, and if you do need it the port should probably start it by
itself, but it should be easy to check.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base

[Scott Ballantyne]

Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Scott Ballantyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > If I'm running multi-user (as toor), the build stops when installing
> > glibc. In linux_base, there's actually a coredump, in linux_base-8, it
> > just stops. This happens even running the GENERIC kernel (I had
> > previously thought it was perhaps related to a custom kernel).
> > 
> > However, if I drop to single user mode, and make install, it
> > completes, although I get many of the following error messages
> > intended for syslogd:
> > 
> > linux: syscall mmap2 (obsolete or not implemented (pid = )
> 
> What version of FreeBSD?  
> Do you have linux(8) running when you try the install?
> 

Sorry, I should have included this: FreeBSD 4.8-p3. Linux.ko isn't
running. For various reasons, I needed to compile the kernel with it
included.

sdb
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base

[Lowell Gilbert]

Scott Ballantyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> If I'm running multi-user (as toor), the build stops when installing
> glibc. In linux_base, there's actually a coredump, in linux_base-8, it
> just stops. This happens even running the GENERIC kernel (I had
> previously thought it was perhaps related to a custom kernel).
> 
> However, if I drop to single user mode, and make install, it
> completes, although I get many of the following error messages
> intended for syslogd:
> 
> linux: syscall mmap2 (obsolete or not implemented (pid = )

What version of FreeBSD?  
Do you have linux(8) running when you try the install?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base-7.1_5

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:36:12AM +, elliot sadlon wrote:
> hi..i recently installed version 4.2, and then i went and installed 
> acroread-4.05 (from the website), and also linux_base-7.1_5 (since it said 
> i needed this very linux emulator)..i went to xwindows (under the fvwm95 
> manager) and clicked the "acrobat button", the problem arising when a bunch 
> of lines came up saying
> "/kernel: linux: syscall fstat64 is obsoleted or not implemented
> /kernel: linux: syscall stat64 is obsoleted or not implemented
> /kernel: linux: syscall setup is obsoleted or not implemented"

These advisory messages are harmless.  glibc will fall back to using
other syscalls.

Kris

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: linux_base-7.1_5

[David Loszewski]

On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 22:36, elliot sadlon wrote:
> hi..i recently installed version 4.2, and then i went and installed 
> acroread-4.05 (from the website), and also linux_base-7.1_5 (since it said i 
> needed this very linux emulator)..i went to xwindows (under the fvwm95 
> manager) and clicked the "acrobat button", the problem arising when a bunch 
> of lines came up saying
> "/kernel: linux: syscall fstat64 is obsoleted or not implemented
> /kernel: linux: syscall stat64 is obsoleted or not implemented
> /kernel: linux: syscall setup is obsoleted or not implemented"
> 
> so, of course, id be incredibly thankful if you could help out..i guess the 
> question is how to get the linux emulator going..
> 
> thanx :)
> 
> _
> Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
> 
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Once you install it from the port it should work, you may need to also
update the database.  What version of acrobat you using because I know
that some versions have some problems with the newer version of the
linux emulator.

-- 
David Loszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDAdmins.net - Your #1 source for BSD Collaboration!

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?

[Vivek Khera]

> "AK" == Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

AK> On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
>> Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>> > I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.
>> 
>> You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5.

AK> I had, but I wanted to run acroread5.

My experience was that to use linux-base-7 successfully with acroread4
or acroread5, I had to be running XFree86 4.x or newer.  With XFree
3.x, acroread would drop core or fail in other ways.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Rockville, MD   +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?

[Alex Kiesel]

On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.
> 
> You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5.

I had, but I wanted to run acroread5.

> Of those two, I find only acroread4 works on my linux-base-7.1, but from
> the error message, it looks like it didn't like my OS upgrade and
> re-making acroread5 would probably fix it.  In any case, the main

Re-making acroread5 did not help; the error message says anything about
some incompatible FreeBSD stuff, so I suppose the start-script is
broken.

Alex


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?

[Gary W. Swearingen]

Alex Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.

You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5.

Of those two, I find only acroread4 works on my linux-base-7.1, but from
the error message, it looks like it didn't like my OS upgrade and
re-making acroread5 would probably fix it.  In any case, the main
programs are scripts which one could probably debug if the problem is in
the script like my problem seems to be.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?

[Alex Kiesel]

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:20, Fernan Aguero wrote:
> Now many ports have their dependencies listed as
> linux_base-7.1 or something similar. This means that my
> linux-compatibility tree got updated when I installed some
> of this ports? or should I do this
> manually by going to /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base and
> doing a 'make install'?

Most ports can run with linux-base-6. Personally I have made better
experience with linux-base-6.

AFAIK linux-base-6 represents a RedHat 6.2 system, while linux-base-7 is
RedHat 7.x. 


> Now, what are the pros and cons of -7.1 and -6?

I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7.
With version 6 I've had no problems.

> Suggestions?

I'd continue to run linux-base-6.

Greets,
Alex


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message