On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:04:20AM -0400, Vince Sabio wrote:
> I need to install zlib (not zlibc), and AFACT it is not included in
> ports. When I look at the zlib web site, I see that there are several
> (not a lot, but several) dependencies for the installation -- and I
> think, "OH NO, NOT DE
** At 13:30 -0400 on 10/03/2009, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/3 Glen Barber :
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Vince Sabio wrote:
>> I need to install zlib (not zlibc), and AFACT it is not included in ports.
When I look at the zlib web site, I see that there are several (not a lot,
but
Vince Sabio wrote:
> I need to install zlib (not zlibc), and AFACT it is not included in
> ports. When I look at the zlib web site, I see that there are several
> (not a lot, but several) dependencies for the installation -- and I
> think, "OH NO, NOT DEPENDENCIES!" Or something like that.
>
> I
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Based on what I read at http://www.zlib.net/
> The latest version (1.2.3) is in base:
zlib(3) agrees.
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
2009/10/3 Glen Barber :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Vince Sabio wrote:
>> I need to install zlib (not zlibc), and AFACT it is not included in ports.
>> When I look at the zlib web site, I see that there are several (not a lot,
>> but several) dependencies for the installation -- and
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Vince Sabio wrote:
> I need to install zlib (not zlibc), and AFACT it is not included in ports.
> When I look at the zlib web site, I see that there are several (not a lot,
> but several) dependencies for the installation -- and I think, "OH NO, NOT
> DEPENDEN
