Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following link:
Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaster
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following link:
Click here for our website
We look forward to
Jarrod == Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com writes:
Jarrod If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would
Jarrod substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's
Jarrod maintainers.
In fact, given the legacy of other security tools created by the author
of
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
But I've never found postfix without a knob to do
version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would
put me
off
aswell
postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the
system
thanks in advance
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2/1/2011 at 8:44 PM Paul Macdonald wrote:
|On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
|
| No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix,
and
| pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
|
| But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want
it to
|
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
thanks in advance
I've used both and both have their advocates/supporters.
I used qmail for about 10 yrs and picked it when basically the choice
was qmail, sendmail and smail.
It
On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote:
What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and
configure.
Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've
seen people claim that it can't be that good since it's so easy to
configure, with great defaults and
When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which
documents it.
Oh, definitely. Particularly if you decide on qmail.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:32, Alessandro Baggi
alessandro.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
thanks in advance
That's a loaded question. Both have advocates, just like vi or
emacs, Linux or Nothing, FreeBSD or OpenBSD, OS X or Windows
and X Window System or CLI.
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com articulated:
Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
qmail is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards.
Postfix is actively
I like qmail, but I would, having written a book about it.
If you want something that works reasonably well out of the
box, I'd use Postfix. If you want something you can tweak to
do whatever you want, qmail is more of a toolkit.
Don't use the version of qmail in ports, it includes way too many
On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
|On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
|Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com articulated:
|
| Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
|
|qmail is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
|numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
|On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
|Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com articulated:
|
| Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
|
|qmail is not actively supported by its
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
|On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
|Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com articulated:
|
| Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
|
|qmail is not actively supported by its
Outback == Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com writes:
|Postfix is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by
|its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding
|documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS
|world.
=
It
On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to
do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:24 +
Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com articulated:
so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me)
what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of
changing?
Without knowing your exact configuration and requirements, answering
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:44:24PM +, Paul Macdonald wrote:
On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Baggi
alessandro.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
qmail is more secure... but the design is just as alien to unix as sendmail is
for example, the fact that qmail uses custom libc, or at least did so on the
version i
Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this
point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the
original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who
could find a vulnerability -- that said, AFAIK that person no longer
maintains
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com wrote:
Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this
point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the
original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone
22 matches
Mail list logo
