albi wrote:
from the ports :
apache20 or apache21 or apache22
which one is the "stable" one ?
I'm just guessing, but probably you could
get an answer at apache.org.
Kevin Kinsey
--
No skis take rocks like rental skis!
___
freebsd-questions@fre
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, bob self wrote:
I just installed FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE and am installing a few applications. I
need apache with php, but I see many php-related packages (with portupgrade
-v php5-\*). So then I tried portupgrade -v php5, but now it wants to know
whether I want to use apache2
Tabor Kelly wrote:
>
> The apache13 port is just apache. The apache-x ports also include x. For
> example, I run apache-modssl, because I needed ssl support. mod_ssl
> isn't really a module since it (also) requires patching the base apache
> code.
>
> As for apache2, I think it is still marked
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 04:39:37PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
> My purpose: Learn FreeBSD, learn Apache, build simple web server.
> Hardware: Dedicated i386 machine, three big HDs (120GB, 120GB, 200GB)
> OS: FreeBSD 5.3. No X windows installed (maybe later?)
If this is to be a dedicated s
* David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031113 09:30]:
> well, since I will be running apache on freebsd I thought I ask which
> one will be the best to use, v1.3 series on v2.x series.
Hi, David!
Apache 1.3 was originally designed for the Unix platform. Although
it also runs with Windows and others,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:39:20PM -0700, David Bear wrote:
> well, since I will be running apache on freebsd I thought I ask which
> one will be the best to use, v1.3 series on v2.x series.
Personally I use apache13 but I believe apache2 is now very stable
(although some features like the perchil
