At 2003-11-17T17:41:27Z, Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for shedding some light into this topic.
You bet.
> -Z, --decompress
> Decompress the input data before searching. This option is only
> available if compiled with zlib(3) library
> We could have said exactly the s
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Grep works perfectly in that respect, thanks - it's your understanding
> that's a bit askew. Say you're in a directory with 'file1.c', 'file2.c',
> 'file3.c', etc. When you type:
>
> grep -r 'string' *.c
>
> your shell (*not* grep!) is expanding yo
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Francisco J Reyes thusly...
> >
> > Do we want something like:
> > grep -r *.c
>
> I do not know about anybody else, i myself like to keep the current
> behaviour for -r option.
Several people have expressed a simmilar s
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, JacobRhoden wrote:
>
> > No need to hack grep plese! just use -R (it appears the man page does not
> > document the -R function, but you need to use -R in grep for it to recurse.
>
> -R == -r
>
> That was mentioned in the previous
At 2003-11-14T03:42:18Z, Francisco J Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think I am going to research what would it take for someone to fix grep
> and pay them.
Grep works perfectly in that respect, thanks - it's your understanding
that's a bit askew. Say you're in a directory with 'file1.c',
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, JacobRhoden wrote:
> No need to hack grep plese! just use -R (it appears the man page does not
> document the -R function, but you need to use -R in grep for it to recurse.
-R == -r
That was mentioned in the previous emails. It only recurses directories.
It will not work wit
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 02:37 pm, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> > > The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> > > something like
> > >
> > > grep -r -li string *.c
> > >
> > > I get no files. However, if I go into one of the subdirectories
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Francisco J Reyes thusly...
>
> Do we want something like:
> grep -r *.c
I do not know about anybody else, i myself like to keep the current
behaviour for -r option.
> If I get someone to change grep anyone care to comment on whether
> it would be difficult
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Viktor Lazlo wrote:
> If there are a large number of files this will call grep numerous
> times--it would be more efficient to pass to xargs so grep is only called
> a few times:
>
> find . -type f -print | xargs grep options string
Although in my case the files are few I wi
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> > The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> > something like
> >
> > grep -r -li string *.c
> >
> > I get no files. However, if I go into one of the subdirectories and do a
> > plain grep *.c then is found on several files.
>
>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Dan Busarow wrote:
> On Nov 13, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> > something like
> >
> > grep -r -li string *.c
>
> find . -name "*.c" -exec grep -li string {} \;
If there are a large number of files this will c
On Nov 13, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> something like
>
> grep -r -li string *.c
find . -name "*.c" -exec grep -li string {} \;
Dan
--
Dan Busarow 949 443 4172
Dana Point Communic
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:55:34PM -0800, Chris Readle wrote:
> You can also do this with something like:
>
> ls -laR | egrep *.c
He's trying to search the contents of files for a string. Your
suggestion searches the directory listing (and not in a very useful way,
since *.c does not mean the s
>
> --- Matthew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:37:39PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> >
> > > The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> > > something like
> > >
> > > grep -r -li string *.c
> > >
> > > I get no files. However, if I go i
--- Matthew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:37:39PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>
> > The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> > something like
> >
> > grep -r -li string *.c
> >
> > I get no files. However, if I go into one of the subdir
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:37:39PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
> something like
>
> grep -r -li string *.c
>
> I get no files. However, if I go into one of the subdirectories and do a
> plain grep *.c then is found on severa
The man page for grep says to use "-r" to recurse, yet when I try
something like
grep -r -li string *.c
I get no files. However, if I go into one of the subdirectories and do a
plain grep *.c then is found on several files.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
17 matches
Mail list logo
