Question about socket syscall in release 6.2

I have found some weird behavior about the socket system call in freebsd release 6.2. The problem appears if I try to open more sockets than the ulimits allows: the socket system call gets blocked instead of returning an EMFILE error. This only happens to me in release 6.2 ( I tested in 7.0

Question behavior about socket syscall in release 6.2

I have found some weird behavior about the socket system call in freebsd release 6.2. The problem appears if I try to open more sockets than the ulimits allows: the socket system call gets blocked instead of returning an EMFILE error. This only happens to me in release 6.2 ( I tested in 7.0

-stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

Hi, Just updated /usr/src to -stable (-rRELENG_6), and are now compiling the -stable kernel. Just wondering if I will need to rebuild the base system (world?) as well so they are in sync? Thanks. -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

Sunnz wrote: Hi, Just updated /usr/src to -stable (-rRELENG_6), and are now compiling the -stable kernel. Just wondering if I will need to rebuild the base system (world?) as well so they are in sync? Probably nothing bad will happen if you don't, but if you start getting weird errors

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

Just updated /usr/src to -stable (-rRELENG_6), and are now compiling the -stable kernel. Just wondering if I will need to rebuild the base system (world?) as well so they are in sync? tell me what base system do you have now. ___

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

6.2-Release. I only have updated the kernel so far. Probably will upgrade the base system soon, but at the same time I wanted to know if it should be something need to be done as quickly as possible. Thanks 2007/3/13, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just updated /usr/src to -stable

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

In response to Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just updated /usr/src to -stable (-rRELENG_6), and are now compiling the -stable kernel. Just wondering if I will need to rebuild the base system (world?) as well so they are in sync? 99% of the time, the answer is yes. The real

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

6.2-Release. I only have updated the kernel so far. my question was what version of base system you have in /bin, /sbin, /lib etc. now so i could answer if you HAVE to compile 6.2, should or don't need to, just put the kernel if your system binaries is 6.0 or later you don't need to

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

Wojciech Puchar wrote: 6.2-Release. I only have updated the kernel so far. my question was what version of base system you have in /bin, /sbin, /lib etc. Check the Subject line :) Cheers, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski karol.kwiat at gmail dot com OpenPGP 0x06E09309 signature.asc

Re: -stable kernel and release 6.2 base system. Do they need to be in sync?

Lol. Yes, all I have done is installing FBSD6.2-Release from a CD, then rebuilt the kernel using 6-stable sources. 2007/3/13, Karol Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wojciech Puchar wrote: 6.2-Release. I only have updated the kernel so far. my question was what version of base system you have

Re: Release 6.2

Thank your very much for your fast answer. Very kind. -- Cordiali saluti, / Best regards, / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, York Make each day count. On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:57 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: York Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am looking for a DVD Image of Release 6.2

Release 6.2

Hello Guys. I am looking for a DVD Image of Release 6.2 to download, but unfortunately (stupid as I am ;-)) I cannot find it. Can you give me an information or a link of a mirror. Would be very kind. Thank you for your trouble. -- Cordiali saluti, / Best regards, / Mit freundlichen Gruessen

Re: Release 6.2

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 01:49:35PM +0100, York Rapp wrote: Hello Guys. I am looking for a DVD Image of Release 6.2 to download, but unfortunately (stupid as I am ;-)) I cannot find it. The FreeBSD project only provides CD iso images. Kris

Re: Release 6.2

On Friday 16 February 2007 07:49, York Rapp wrote: I am looking for a DVD Image of Release 6.2 to download, but unfortunately (stupid as I am ;-)) I cannot find it. Can you give me an information or a link of a mirror. The FreeBSD Project distributes releases as a two-CD set. All you need

Re: Release 6.2

York Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am looking for a DVD Image of Release 6.2 to download, but unfortunately (stupid as I am ;-)) I cannot find it. Can you give me an information or a link of a mirror. The FreeBSD Project does not release official ISOs larger than CD size. The extra

Re: Release 6.2

On 2/16/07, York Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Guys. I am looking for a DVD Image of Release 6.2 to download, but unfortunately (stupid as I am ;-)) I cannot find it. Can you give me an information or a link of a mirror. Would be very kind. Thank you for your trouble. -- Cordiali

Re: partition/cd recognition problem hal GNOME 2.16 FreeBSD RELEASE 6.2

On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:53 -0800, Charles Schaum wrote: Kudos to the GNOME FreeBSD team for continuing improvements. Problem: Hal no longer recognizes all vfat partitions. Two vfat partitions at ad0s1 and ad1s2 exist. Only ad0s1 now appears. CD burning now proceeds better via Nautilus.

partition/cd recognition problem hal GNOME 2.16 FreeBSD RELEASE 6.2

Kudos to the GNOME FreeBSD team for continuing improvements. Problem: Hal no longer recognizes all vfat partitions. Two vfat partitions at ad0s1 and ad1s2 exist. Only ad0s1 now appears. CD burning now proceeds better via Nautilus. Before portsnap / portmaster that failed altogether. Now CD-R