Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:27PM -0800, Kevin Stevens wrote:

> If you're running the U10 headless, dropping DTR on the connection 
> will, by default, drop the U10 into OpenBoot, stopping execution of the 
> OS (this is true on most if all Sun boxes, not just the U10).  There's 
> a simple setting change to make on the U10 if you don't want this to 
> happen.  I no longer recall what it is offhand, but a quick Google 
> should fix you up.

On most sun kit, turning the power key to the padlock symbol will
prevent the system breaking to OBP on loss of DTR on the console.

There's an equivalent thing you can do on the netras and other small
kit that doesn't have a key as such -- I think it's just setting an
environment variable in the OBP stuff.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:27PM -0800, Kevin Stevens wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2003, at 06:55, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> >
> >This FreeBSD box is a headless one which is also has a DB9 to a
> >headless Ultra-10 at my house and when I reboot it does
> >something wonky to the Ultra-10 so I'd hate to do that remotely
> >right now for I'm at work and couldn't "kick-it" manually if I
> >had to.
> 
> If you're running the U10 headless, dropping DTR on the connection 
> will, by default, drop the U10 into OpenBoot, stopping execution of the 
> OS (this is true on most if all Sun boxes, not just the U10).  There's 
> a simple setting change to make on the U10 if you don't want this to 
> happen.  I no longer recall what it is offhand, but a quick Google 
> should fix you up.

It's in /etc/default/kbd; I also forget the name of the option, but it
has ALTERNATE in the name.

Ceri

-- 


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Kevin Stevens
On Nov 26, 2003, at 07:11, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:

At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 it looks like Kevin Stevens composed:

Both these machines are on the network via cat5 and I can't
remember if I had to unplug the serial to reboot the FreeBSD box
before and not affect the Ultra-10 or what I did. I know now
that the serial cable is hooked up so I'll wait till I get home.
I do recall that when Solaris would "halt" I would have to
serial in and I think type "go" if I'm not mistaken -- then it
would resume running.  It was in a protective sleep mode if I
recall and did not need to be rebooted.
Yes, that's what I described; "go" is the command to exit OpenBoot and  
resume program (OS) execution.  It isn't a sleep mode, btw, everything  
is still spinning and humming.

My worst instance of this was working (desperately) on a new Sun blade  
server trying to get some network modelling software running.  My  
connection was via PC laptop COM1, and as I was typing someone  
periodically would hook up to the IR link on the laptop to transfer  
some more files to me to copy over.  Every time they did so, the Sun  
would apparently crash.

The IR link set itself up as COM3 on a shared interrupt with COM1,  
every time it saw activity on the port it invisibly interrupted the  
terminal session and the Sun was dropping into OpenBoot.

Oops.

KeS



--
|<--"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"-- 
>|
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076 -o)
San Francisco CA 94121 /\
"UNIX, A Way Of Life."_\_v

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Bill Schoolcraft
At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 it looks like Kevin Stevens composed:

> If you're running the U10 headless, dropping DTR on the connection
> will, by default, drop the U10 into OpenBoot, stopping execution of the
> OS (this is true on most if all Sun boxes, not just the U10).  There's
> a simple setting change to make on the U10 if you don't want this to
> happen.  I no longer recall what it is offhand, but a quick Google
> should fix you up.
>
> Even if you still don't want to reboot the fbsd box, I'd think you'd
> want to fix this for reliability reasons.
>

Thanks,

Both these machines are on the network via cat5 and I can't
remember if I had to unplug the serial to reboot the FreeBSD box
before and not affect the Ultra-10 or what I did. I know now
that the serial cable is hooked up so I'll wait till I get home.

I do recall that when Solaris would "halt" I would have to
serial in and I think type "go" if I'm not mistaken -- then it
would resume running.  It was in a protective sleep mode if I
recall and did not need to be rebooted.

--
|<--"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"-->|
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076 -o)
San Francisco CA 94121 /\
"UNIX, A Way Of Life."_\_v

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Kevin Stevens
On Nov 26, 2003, at 06:55, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:

At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 it looks like Lowell Gilbert composed:

With something as important as starting up a mailer, I recommend a
quick reboot just to be sure that it will start back up
Thanks for the reply,

This FreeBSD box is a headless one which is also has a DB9 to a
headless Ultra-10 at my house and when I reboot it does
something wonky to the Ultra-10 so I'd hate to do that remotely
right now for I'm at work and couldn't "kick-it" manually if I
had to.
If you're running the U10 headless, dropping DTR on the connection 
will, by default, drop the U10 into OpenBoot, stopping execution of the 
OS (this is true on most if all Sun boxes, not just the U10).  There's 
a simple setting change to make on the U10 if you don't want this to 
happen.  I no longer recall what it is offhand, but a quick Google 
should fix you up.

Even if you still don't want to reboot the fbsd box, I'd think you'd 
want to fix this for reliability reasons.

KeS

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Bill Schoolcraft
At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 it looks like Lowell Gilbert composed:

> With something as important as starting up a mailer, I recommend a
> quick reboot just to be sure that it will start back up

Thanks for the reply,

This FreeBSD box is a headless one which is also has a DB9 to a
headless Ultra-10 at my house and when I reboot it does
something wonky to the Ultra-10 so I'd hate to do that remotely
right now for I'm at work and couldn't "kick-it" manually if I
had to.

I'll wait till I get home but for now Postfix is working fine,
just don't know if it will start automatically when I reboot.
When I built it from /usr/ports all it asked was "Do I want to
replace Sendmail with Postfix" and I said yes..

--
|<--"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"-->|
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076 -o)
San Francisco CA 94121 /\
"UNIX, A Way Of Life."_\_v

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Bill Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> In other words, how would you correctly "source" the
> /etc/rc.conf file if you can at all or is this file only meant
> to be referenced at boot time?

It's intended to be referenced at boot time, but it's often not very
difficult to figure out what is supposed to happen.

With something as important as starting up a mailer, I recommend a
quick reboot just to be sure that it will start back up properly if
you should, say, have an unplanned outage tonight.  But the risk
assessment depends on your particular situation.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Bill Schoolcraft
At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 it looks like Jonas Manalive composed:

> Check /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf
>
> I believe it should be:
>
> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain $mydomain
>
> I had the same problem, I changed to include this and set also
> myhostname, mydomain and myorigin. Now it is working perfectly!
>

Thanks Jonas,

Actually I went and did the following commands and I can now
send mail independently from my ISP's smtp server.  I haven't
changed anything yet in /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf

postfix check

postfix start

The manpage for "postfix" stated that "start" will also run
"check" but I ran it anyway.

My mail headers from this email show postfix setting it's mark.

Thanks again.

--
|<--"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"-->|
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076 -o)
San Francisco CA 94121 /\
"UNIX, A Way Of Life."_\_v

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Jonas Manalive
Check /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf

I believe it should be:

mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain $mydomain

I had the same problem, I changed to include this and set also
myhostname, mydomain and myorigin. Now it is working perfectly!

Best regards,

Jonas

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 03:21, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> Hello Family,
> 
> I recently whacked the default outgoing mail process on my
> FreeBSD-4.8 system and could no longer send mail with Pine using
> "localhost" although I could in fact send mail with the command:
> 
> mail -s "mail test" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> So I went into /usr/ports/postfix-current and did an install and
> at the end the instructions were to add the following to
> /etc/rc.conf
> 
> 
> sendmail_enable="YES"
> sendmail_flags="-bd"
> sendmail_outbound_enable="NO"
> sendmail_submit_enable="NO"
> sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO"
> 
> 
> Now, I see basicall the command of `sendmail -bd` nested in the
> above settings but I'm not quite sure about the other three.
> 
> In other words, how would you correctly "source" the
> /etc/rc.conf file if you can at all or is this file only meant
> to be referenced at boot time?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> |<--"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"-->|
> Bill Schoolcraft
> PO Box 210076 -o)
> San Francisco CA 94121 /\
> "UNIX, A Way Of Life."_\_v
> 
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Starting new entries in /etc/rc.conf

2003-11-26 Thread Bill Schoolcraft
Hello Family,

I recently whacked the default outgoing mail process on my
FreeBSD-4.8 system and could no longer send mail with Pine using
"localhost" although I could in fact send mail with the command:

mail -s "mail test" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So I went into /usr/ports/postfix-current and did an install and
at the end the instructions were to add the following to
/etc/rc.conf


sendmail_enable="YES"
sendmail_flags="-bd"
sendmail_outbound_enable="NO"
sendmail_submit_enable="NO"
sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO"


Now, I see basicall the command of `sendmail -bd` nested in the
above settings but I'm not quite sure about the other three.

In other words, how would you correctly "source" the
/etc/rc.conf file if you can at all or is this file only meant
to be referenced at boot time?

Thanks

--
|<--"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"-->|
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076 -o)
San Francisco CA 94121 /\
"UNIX, A Way Of Life."_\_v

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"