Re: TeaPOP pop3 server.
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:11:47AM -0700 or thereabouts, Richard Marriner wrote: > Gary wrote: > > I would say, give it a go... on high volume servers, the focal area of > > concern is disk I/O, as this will be your slowest area. > Thank you for your suggestion. I will for sure give it a try.. You are welcome. It sounds like a nice project... The only thing I would have done differently (purely subjective on my part), would be to use LDAP with or without PAM auth instead of the MySql db... LDAP scales well into the millions of users, if need be, and runs very smooth enjoy -- Gary ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: TeaPOP pop3 server.
Gary wrote: > I would say, give it a go... on high volume servers, the focal area of > concern is disk I/O, as this will be your slowest area. Thank you for your suggestion. I will for sure give it a try.. Richard Marriner II - [EMAIL PROTECTED] SYIX.COM - Internet Systems Specialist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: TeaPOP pop3 server.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:28:31PM -0700 or thereabouts, Richard Marriner wrote: >I am not sure of where to ask this question, but I have just recently > finished configuring Postfix:Virtual:SMTPAUTH+MySQL+TeaPOP and it works > great. Fortunatly (maybe unfortunately) it is on a test server. Our main > mail server (which we are planning to implement this technology to) is > currently running Postfix:SMTPAUTH+Qpopper. okay.. > My questions is whether or not the Postfix+MySQL+TeaPOP system is secure > and fast enough to put on a medium to high traffic production server > with approx. 3500 accounts. should be without any problem.. 3500 accounts is not a lot of mail, really, and is really not considered a "high traffic" email server. When you get over 20-30 emails/sec.. 1200-1800 / minute ... or over 100,000 emails an hour, that is getting to be a high traffic server postfix/mysql no problem handling what you need. I am not familiar with TeaPOP, and in looking at their site, they have been out for a few years, and I have not come across any prior security history problems with them, that I have heard, unlike Qpopper, which has a very real history of security issues.. I would say, give it a go... on high volume servers, the focal area of concern is disk I/O, as this will be your slowest area. -- Gary ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
TeaPOP pop3 server.
Dear List, I am not sure of where to ask this question, but I have just recently finished configuring Postfix:Virtual:SMTPAUTH+MySQL+TeaPOP and it works great. Fortunatly (maybe unfortunately) it is on a test server. Our main mail server (which we are planning to implement this technology to) is currently running Postfix:SMTPAUTH+Qpopper. My questions is whether or not the Postfix+MySQL+TeaPOP system is secure and fast enough to put on a medium to high traffic production server with approx. 3500 accounts. Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated. Richard Marriner II - [EMAIL PROTECTED] SYIX.COM - Internet Systems Specialist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
