+++ stan [freebsd] [30-01-04 14:31 -0500]:
| On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
| > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9
port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
| > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) bec
On Friday 30 January 2004 20:31, stan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
> > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install
> > the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
> > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
> There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9
> port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
> -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of differences in
> command line argument
lf Of Robert Huff
> Sent: 30 January 2004 15:51
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8
>
>
>
> stan writes:
>
> > What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind
> 8. I have
> > made the port, but it
stan writes:
> What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind 8. I
> have made the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow
> delete the existing bind8, right?
Look in /etc/rc.conf - there are variables for the bind program
and command line flags.
You wil
What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind 8. I have made
the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow delete the existing
bind8, right?
I see the entry in /etc/defaults/mak.conf that instructs the buld process
to not build it, but I already did a make world before findin
