# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-04 14:02:46 +1030:
On Thursday, 2 January 2003 at 16:53:05 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
plus, you stuff the output in $myfile, and get the input from it as
well. How's that supposed to work? :)
Heh. You're looking at this section, no doubt:
cat
On Sunday, 5 January 2003 at 16:16:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-04 14:02:46 +1030:
On Thursday, 2 January 2003 at 16:53:05 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
plus, you stuff the output in $myfile, and get the input from it as
well. How's that supposed to
On 2003-01-05 16:16, Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-04 14:02:46 +1030:
cat $myfile
server=`egrep -i $myfile In: [HE][HE]LO|sed 's/^.*LO *//' `
if [ $server = ]; then
server=`egrep -i $myfile ^Subject.*errors from |sed
On Thursday, 2 January 2003 at 16:53:05 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-02 16:40:45 +0100:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-30 11:26:22 +1030:
On Sunday, 29 December 2002 at 18:46:12 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 10:55:11 +1030:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-30 11:26:22 +1030:
On Sunday, 29 December 2002 at 18:46:12 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 10:55:11 +1030:
...
For more information, take a look at the following, which is a message
I send to systems which appear to be
On Thursday, 2 January 2003 at 16:40:45 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-30 11:26:22 +1030:
On Sunday, 29 December 2002 at 18:46:12 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 10:55:11 +1030:
...
For more information, take a look at the
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-30 11:26:22 +1030:
On Sunday, 29 December 2002 at 18:46:12 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 10:55:11 +1030:
...
For more information, take a look at the following, which is a message
I send to systems which appear to be
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 09:03:08PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
freebsd.org does not care if your reverse DNS mapping points back to
the name you identified yourself with, it only checks that the name
the server IDs itself as when submitting email resolves to the correct
IP address.
Many
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 10:55:11 +1030:
...
For more information, take a look at the following, which is a message
I send to systems which appear to be bona fide attempts from broken
reverse addresses. Looking at the name of the sender, I'm sure this
one is not bona fide, and I
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-28 19:15:49 +0100:
Today Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
If 450 is some error code, then it's only a
ISTR Postfix replies with 450 to (almost) all errors by default.
And there are errors where you need to escalate the 4xx response to 554 to
stop the sending MTA from re-trying for days, or just harvest the 4xx ip's
to a new .map filean block with 554.
Postfix's new sender address
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 10:06 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
ISTR Postfix replies with 450 to (almost) all errors by default.
And there are errors where you need to escalate the 4xx response to
554 to stop the sending MTA from re-trying for days, or just harvest
the 4xx ip's to a new
On Sunday, 29 December 2002 at 18:46:12 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 10:55:11 +1030:
...
For more information, take a look at the following, which is a message
I send to systems which appear to be bona fide attempts from broken
reverse addresses.
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I've
never sent spam!!! Your rejection is very disconcerting.
Harry
Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com
(66.45.116.138) gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I've
never sent spam!!! Your rejection is very
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:50:54 +0100
From: rocky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: rocky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com
(66.45.116.138) gets rejected.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I've
Easier said than done. I've been assigned 66.45.116.136/29 by the ISP.
.136 is not a power of 2 which is required for classless reverse
delegation. It should be .132/29 or .140/29
I control DNS for quadtelecom.com, but I don't control the reverse
lookup. I'd like to know the exact
Today Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
If 450 is some error code, then it's only a _temporary_ error/failure
(RFC 1893). Maybe the DNS servers
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
I'm getting this all the time too. It seems that after a while my mails
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 11:27:53 -0600, Len Conrad wrote:
Easier said than done. I've been assigned 66.45.116.136/29 by the ISP.
.136 is not a power of 2 which is required for classless reverse
delegation.
They don't need to be powers of 2.
It should be .132/29 or .140/29
No,
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 22:32:30 +, lewiz wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
I'm
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 04:22 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
No, this means that your DNS is flaky. As somebody observed, this is
a transient error. Your MTA retries about every 30 minutes for about
5 days, and sooner or later the reverse lookup succeeds, and your mail
is
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:34:28PM -0500, Fuzzy wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 22:32:30 +, lewiz wrote:
No, this means that your DNS is flaky. As somebody observed, this is
a transient error. Your MTA retries about every 30
24 matches
Mail list logo
