Re: batching port builds

2006-07-02 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 6/30/06, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > >> If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset >> defaults for each port with options. Or you can do >> 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all

Re: batching port builds

2006-07-01 Thread backyard1454-bsd
--- Javier Echaiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can put BATCH=yes in your /etc/make.conf > > The settings for each port (if it has something to > config) are stored > in /var/db/ports/{port dir name}/options (just in > case you want to see > what the port assumed). > > If you want to config

Re: batching port builds

2006-07-01 Thread Javier Echaiz
You can put BATCH=yes in your /etc/make.conf The settings for each port (if it has something to config) are stored in /var/db/ports/{port dir name}/options (just in case you want to see what the port assumed). If you want to configure ports (with than ncurses blues screen) sometimes and assume d

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread RW
On Friday 30 June 2006 17:31, David J Brooks wrote: > On Friday 30 June 2006 11:10, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > Apologies if this is in a FAQ, I didn't see it. > > > > How does one tell the ports system to not query interactively for input, > > and just take default build options, or a predefined

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread RW
On Saturday 01 July 2006 00:44, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > > > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > > > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > > > 'make config-recursive' - which will off

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread Gerard Seibert
Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > > > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > > 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for > > the port in whose d

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread David J Brooks
On Friday 30 June 2006 13:25, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > > 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Michael P. Soulier wrote: On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset defaults for each port with options. Or you can do 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for the port in whose directory you're cur

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Michael P. Soulier wrote: On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset defaults for each port with options. Or you can do 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for the port in whose directory you're cur

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for > the port in whose directory you're currently in and all it

Re: batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread David J Brooks
On Friday 30 June 2006 11:10, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Apologies if this is in a FAQ, I didn't see it. > > How does one tell the ports system to not query interactively for input, > and just take default build options, or a predefined set of options? > Running a portupgrade -a and finding the ni

batching port builds

2006-06-30 Thread Michael P. Soulier
Apologies if this is in a FAQ, I didn't see it. How does one tell the ports system to not query interactively for input, and just take default build options, or a predefined set of options? Running a portupgrade -a and finding the night wasted while the box sat waiting for input is no fun at all.