RE: Future development of Jail (was Re: corporate backers of freebsd)

2008-01-05 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message- > From: Andy Dills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:29 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Future development of Jail (was Re: corporate backers of > freebsd) > >

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2008-01-03 Thread FreeBSD WickerBill
n 2, 2008 4:56 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Smithe > > > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:11 AM >

Re: Future development of Jail (was Re: corporate backers of freebsd)

2008-01-02 Thread Karl Triebes
On Jan 2, 2008 9:28 AM, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you really think what I'm suggesting is that bad of an idea, help me > understand why the CTO of F5 immediately posted asking for a quote on > developing this feature? Just for the record, I'm not the same person as the CTO of F5.

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2008-01-02 Thread Gary Smithe
On Jan 2, 2008 4:56 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Smithe > > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:11 AM > > To: freebsd-questions@

RE: Future development of Jail (was Re: corporate backers of freebsd)

2008-01-02 Thread Andy Dills
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I don't. In the entire history of computers every time there has > been a horsepower increase, the "normal" software that people run > on the system has bloated to consume all available additional horsepower. Really? So how has the amount of horsep

RE: Future development of Jail (was Re: corporate backers of freebsd)

2008-01-02 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Dills > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 5:52 PM > To: Colin Percival > Cc: Pollywog; Giorgos Keramidas; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Future development of Jail (was

RE: corporate backers of freebsd

2008-01-02 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Smithe > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:11 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: corporate backers of freebsd > > > Good Day All and Happy New Year, &g

Future development of Jail (was Re: corporate backers of freebsd)

2007-12-31 Thread Andy Dills
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Colin Percival wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Yes, Gary, there are companies who also fund FreeBSD work in several > > ways [...] Some examples which I recall off the top of my head are: > > Don't forget pair Networks, which has generously supported phk, andre, > and m

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-12-31 16:57, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Yes, Gary, there are companies who also fund FreeBSD work in several > > ways [...] Some examples which I recall off the top of my head are: > > Don't forget pair Networks, which has generously supported

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: The support of Isilon Systems for VFS locking, which was then 'ported' back to FreeBSD. Jeff Roberson worked with Isilon Systems to bring VFS locking to FreeBSD, and it is not part of the official kernel ^^^

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Colin Percival
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Yes, Gary, there are companies who also fund FreeBSD work in several > ways [...] Some examples which I recall off the top of my head are: Don't forget pair Networks, which has generously supported phk, andre, and myself on our respective "sponsored FreeBSD coding" fundr

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-12-31 23:14, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Monday 31 December 2007 18:10:55 Gary Smithe wrote: >> In short, here's my question: >> Canonical, RedHat, IBM, Novell, and a slew of others are funding / >> supporting Linux development and pushing some of that development >> into the fr

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Pollywog
On Monday 31 December 2007 18:10:55 Gary Smithe wrote: > > In short, here's my question: > > Canonical, RedHat, IBM, Novell, and a slew of others are funding / > supporting Linux development and pushing some of that development into > the free community, so that all can benefit from full-time deve

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread DAve
Gary Smithe wrote: > Good Day All and Happy New Year, > > I'm not looking to incite anyone, but here comes a BSD vs Linux > question. Yes, I tried searching the archives and found nothing. > > I used FreeBSD back in 2000 for a few firewalls, but due to certain > influences I switched to Linux af

Re: corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Kurt Buff
On Dec 31, 2007 10:10 AM, Gary Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've seen where Cisco and Juniper are using FreeBSD, and assuming > there are other big names, do they directly fund or contribute to the > community? If memory serves, Yahoo! also is a substantial user of FreeBSD, though I don't h

corporate backers of freebsd

2007-12-31 Thread Gary Smithe
Good Day All and Happy New Year, I'm not looking to incite anyone, but here comes a BSD vs Linux question. Yes, I tried searching the archives and found nothing. I used FreeBSD back in 2000 for a few firewalls, but due to certain influences I switched to Linux after a couple of years. I'm inter