Hi.
See below.
Lots of software sources are configured with GNU autotools, which is why
a lot of third party software will only compile with GNU make. In the
case of dealii, not only are its sources configured with autotools, but
I looked at their docs and at
Written by Dima Sorkin on 07/26/07 16:37
Hi.
Thank you very much. See below.
Regards, Dima.
On 7/27/07, Nikola Lecic wrote:
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a
third-party application, available through devel/gmake port.
They _are_ different.
Yes, I forgot
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
changes by me.
There is a make and a gmake installed on it. They report that they
are the same programm, but in fact they behave completely different.
In fact only gmake behaves
like GNU make should behave and only with gmake
Hi.
Thank you very much. See below.
Regards, Dima.
On 7/27/07, Nikola Lecic wrote:
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a
third-party application, available through devel/gmake port.
They _are_ different.
Yes, I forgot there was an alias. See at the bottom
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:26:28PM +0300, Dima Sorkin wrote:
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
changes by me.
There is a make and a gmake installed on it. They report that they
are the same programm, but in fact they behave completely different.
In fact
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:26:28 +0300
Dima Sorkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
changes by me.
There is a make and a gmake installed on it.
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a
third-party
On 7/26/07, Dima Sorkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 6.2, installed it from the distribution disks, no
changes by me.
There is a make and a gmake installed on it. They report that they
are the same programm, but in fact they behave completely different.
In fact only gmake
