First, my apologies for previous posts which hijacked an existing thread.
I thought changing the subject line was ok and had forgotten about in-reply-to.
So my apologies for a repost; I've gotten no replies and am not sure others
actually
saw / processed it or just ignored because of the bad
I have a problem with a login on FreeBSD (8.3-p1)
Dont' know what was done wrong, but a certain user (lets call it
THATUSER) can no longer login.
the entries for 'THATUSER in /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd are still
the same as from a backup
of 14 days ago (no change in encrypted passwd)
The
On Wed, 9 May 2012 14:04:35 +0200, n dhert wrote:
the entries for 'THATUSER in /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd are still
the same as from a backup
of 14 days ago (no change in encrypted passwd)
The /etc/pwd.db and /etc/spwd.db are binary files so I can't check..
You can easily rebuild
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed May 9 07:09:19 2012
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:04:35 +0200
From: n dhert ndhert...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK
I have a problem with a login on FreeBSD (8.3-p1)
Dont' know
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Details are *IMPORTANT* grin
What's the user's shell in the password file, and does that shell:
exist? executable? In the /etc/shells file?
___
On 5/9/2012 8:08 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert Bonomibon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Details are *IMPORTANT*grin
What's the user's shell in the password file, and does that shell:
exist? executable? In the /etc/shells file?
On 05/09/12 12:02, Brian wrote:
On 5/9/2012 8:08 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert
Bonomibon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Details are *IMPORTANT*grin
What's the user's shell in the password file, and does that shell:
exist? executable? In the /etc/shells
I`ve gotten a 17 inch monitor in addition to my 22 inch working with 2
separate desktops. I plan to have stuff like wireshark etc on the
smallest. But I have a problem, I can get no work done since I have no
mouse or keyboard working on the 17...
Anyone have somewhere with a solution to point
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:43:31 +0200, Kenneth Hatteland wrote:
I`ve gotten a 17 inch monitor in addition to my 22 inch working with 2
separate desktops. I plan to have stuff like wireshark etc on the
smallest. But I have a problem, I can get no work done since I have no
mouse or keyboard
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:43:31 +0200, Kenneth Hatteland wrote:
I`ve gotten a 17 inch monitor in addition to my 22 inch working with 2
separate desktops. I plan to have stuff like wireshark etc on the
smallest. But I have a problem, I can get no work done
I installed a new FreeBSD-8.2 system
and installed a few ports, no problem
Then I do want to install Xorg
# cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
# make install clean
At the package libxslt 1.1.26_3 it gives me an options screen.
I hit TAB to go to the OK button, but it just moves the cursor 8 postions
Hi,
I've never experienced anything similar but one workaround is to edit the
Makefile: and change the Off to On for the options you need, and the
other way around for the options you don;t need.
Still, the real problem eludes me and that;s the one that needs fixing.
--
Best regards,
Claudiu
Well, I wanted the output to be logged, so in fact I did
# make install clean | tee /tmp/xorg-install.txt
Now, I tried again without the | tee ... and there wasn't a problem now ...
But the | tee shouldn't be a problem, since in my script I run every
week for a number
of years already to do
It's OK, You've already changed the
FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick.im on site, the checksums are the
same as I calculate.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Ruben
Original Message
Subject:wrong MD5 and SHA256 ?!?
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:29:08 +0400
From: Ruben R
Based on advice to switch to portmaster from portupgrade, I am now
having a problem with perl. When I went to upgrade a perl package, it
re-installed perl, but fail (and removed perl). I am getting this
message:
=== perl-5.8.9_3 : Your apache does not support DSO modules.
I have tried to
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:08:20PM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:04:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog
than i had YEARS ago. cannot find.
it had a
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 03:40:00PM +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:08:20PM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:04:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog
Quoth Gary Kline on Saturday, 31 July 2010:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 03:40:00PM +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:08:20PM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:04:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:30:01PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Gary Kline on Saturday, 31 July 2010:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 03:40:00PM +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:08:20PM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On
29.07.2010 05:04, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08 08 echo Send Bill a birthday card.
# watch one-time broadcast!!
08 09 2010 echo: Watch
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:04:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08 08 echo Send Bill a birthday card.
# watch one-time
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:15:53PM -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 7/28/10 10:04 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
http://www.roaringpenguin.com/products/remind
Would it be Remind?
Best,
--Glenn
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:15:53PM -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 7/28/10 10:04 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 08:37:27PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Gary Kline on Wednesday, 28 July 2010:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08 08 echo Send Bill a birthday card.
# watch
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:04:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog
than i had YEARS ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08 08 echo
Gary == Gary Kline kl...@thought.org writes:
Gary guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
Gary ago. cannot find.
Gary it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
Gary QUOTE
Gary # Bill's birthday:
Gary 08 08 echo Send Bill a birthday card.
Gary #
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:20:41PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Gary == Gary Kline kl...@thought.org writes:
Gary guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
Gary ago. cannot find.
Gary it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
Gary QUOTE
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08 08 echo Send Bill a birthday card.
# watch one-time broadcast!!
08 09 2010 echo: Watch PBS show at 20:00 hours
/QUOTE
i
On 7/28/10 10:04 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
http://www.roaringpenguin.com/products/remind
Would it be Remind?
Best,
--Glenn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Quoth Gary Kline on Wednesday, 28 July 2010:
guys, i've been searching for a calender/reminder prog than i had YEARS
ago. cannot find.
it had a ~/.datafile that was ascii. things like
QUOTE
# Bill's birthday:
08 08 echo Send Bill a birthday card.
# watch one-time broadcast!!
08
-- Original Message --
From: Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com
Reply-To: lcon...@go2france.com
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:48:26 +0200
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin =
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:13:49PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com
Reply-To: lcon...@go2france.com
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:48:26 +0200
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
You wont even et IA64 booting as that is a compilation for Itanium
processors.
For the 64bit enabled Xeon processors Intel licensed the AMD64 instruction
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:13:49PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com
Reply-To: lcon...@go2france.com
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:48:26 +0200
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU:
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
Len
This is a case where I wish the architecture types were renamed to modern day
nomenclature. Most people outside the *nix world know i386 as the x86
architecture and AMD64 as either x86-64 or straight x64. IA64 is
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
No you want: IA64 not AMD64
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:48, lconrad@ wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Yes.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:48:26PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:08 PM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
No you want: IA64 not AMD64
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:48, lconrad@ wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:08:23PM -0400, jhell wrote:
No you want: IA64 not AMD64
No, he does not want that. IA64 is for Intel's Itanium CPUs which are only
used in a few big servers and just about nowhere else. The below is an
ordinary x86 CPU (which the Itanium most certainly is not.)
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:10, rsmith@ wrote:
Yes.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:48:26PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Get cpuid from /usr/ports/misc/cpuid and run it, that should give you a
better idea of what your processor is. Although, from the string you
gave, looks like a 'yes'. I think that's a nocona xeon (I have a pair of
gallatins).
jhell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:10, rsmith@ wrote:
Yes.
On
i used google's search protocol to get around those of craiglist.org.
that gave me a series of new and used dual- and quad-core (*Intel*)
bozen for my new fbsd server and firewall. and i spent hours scoping out
which is the fastest for the least cost. i had zero idea how many dozen
of kinds of
El día Wednesday, August 27, 2008 a las 01:00:18PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
the DUMP itself seems to be ok because a restore like this works:
$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat dumpsRebelion-20080825/usr.dmp.gz' | gzip -dc |
restore -xv -f - ./home/guru/myThings/Espanol/diario2008
Hello,
Some days ago I have done a dump of my /usr file system with:
# dump -0auL -P ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'gzip -c dumpsRebelion/usr.dmp.gz'
/usr
the DUMP ended fine with no errors; today I try to reload certain
directory with:
$ restore -xv -P ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'gzip -dc
Some days ago I have done a dump of my /usr file system with:
# dump -0auL -P ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'gzip -c dumpsRebelion/usr.dmp.gz'
/usr
why not
dump -0auL -P /usr |gzip -cssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat
dumpsRebelion/usr.dmp.gz'
?
the DUMP ended fine with no errors; today I try to
El día Wednesday, August 27, 2008 a las 11:10:53AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar
escribió:
Some days ago I have done a dump of my /usr file system with:
# dump -0auL -P ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'gzip -c dumpsRebelion/usr.dmp.gz'
/usr
why not
dump -0auL -P /usr |gzip -cssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with no errors; today I try to reload certain
directory with:
$ restore -xv -P ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'gzip -dc
dumpsRebelion/usr.dmp.gz'
./home/guru/myThings/Espanol/diario2008
should't be
but it does; reproduceable :-(
the DUMP itself seems to be ok because a restore like this works
would not switch
to a text screen (although it did allow AltTab to bring up FVWM's
window list). After clicking OK:
Visio Setup
i Setup failed.
and it quit.
What version of Visio is this?
3.0. Long before M$ took it over
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:10:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wine has its own simple version of Wordpad though.
Just run wine wordpad.
This version has its own notepad, but it doesn't appear to have
wordpad. (There's no wordpad.exe that I can find, but there
are two identical copies of
that CtrlAltF1 would not switch
to a text screen (although it did allow AltTab to bring up FVWM's
window list). After clicking OK:
Visio Setup
i Setup failed.
and it quit.
Were there any messages printed in the terminal window?
What version
it did allow AltTab to bring up FVWM's
window list). After clicking OK:
Visio Setup
i Setup failed.
and it quit.
Were there any messages printed in the terminal window?
No.
What version of Visio is this?
3.0. Long
Wine has its own simple version of Wordpad though.
Just run wine wordpad.
This version has its own notepad, but it doesn't appear to have
wordpad. (There's no wordpad.exe that I can find, but there
are two identical copies of notepad.exe -- one in .../windows
and the other in
to bring up FVWM's
window list). After clicking OK:
Visio Setup
i Setup failed.
and it quit.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Wine has its own simple version of Wordpad though.
Just run wine wordpad.
This version has its own notepad, but it doesn't appear to have
wordpad. (There's no wordpad.exe that I can find, but there
are two identical copies of notepad.exe -- one in .../windows
and the other in
On Saturday 26 April 2008 10:02:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really easier to try to install an app under Wine...
With, it seems, at least two exceptions:
* Some apps -- such as Wordpad and Write -- are packaged and
installed with Windows, rather than on separate media. Are
there
It's really easier to try to install an app under Wine ...
With, it seems, at least two exceptions:
* Some apps -- such as Wordpad and Write -- are packaged and
installed with Windows, rather than on separate media. Are
there instructions somewhere for installing such an app
under wine?
If I were you I'd just try to install Visio under Wine and see how
it goes. That is, mount the install cd, check with winecfg that
Wine can see the mount point as a drive D: or something and then
run wine d:\\setup.exe ...
It did not work at all. This version of Visio is old enough that
it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ ls -la .wine/dosdevices
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 2 perryh staff 512 Apr 21 00:17 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 perryh staff 512 Apr 22 21:07 ..
lrwxr-xr-x 1 perryh staff8 Apr 21 00:17 a:: - /dev/fd0
Is the second colon intentional
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 08:11:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were you I'd just try to install Visio under Wine and see how
it goes. That is, mount the install cd, check with winecfg that
Wine can see the mount point as a drive D: or something and then
run wine d:\\setup.exe ...
It did
$ ls -la .wine/dosdevices
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 2 perryh staff 512 Apr 21 00:17 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 perryh staff 512 Apr 22 21:07 ..
lrwxr-xr-x 1 perryh staff8 Apr 21 00:17 a:: - /dev/fd0
Is the second colon intentional
Yes! That is exactly what the manpage
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 06:00:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... If you want to run applications under Wine either install
them under Wine or (with simple applications) copy them over
from a Windows install into ~/.wine/drive_c.
And specifically I'd populate ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/fonts
from
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:59:35 +0200
Tijl Coosemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wine is not meant to work that way. You should see Wine as a separate
Windows. If you want to run applications under Wine either install
them under Wine or (with simple applications) copy them over from a
Windows
... If you want to run applications under Wine either install
them under Wine or (with simple applications) copy them over
from a Windows install into ~/.wine/drive_c.
And specifically I'd populate ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/fonts
from a real windows installation.
Which raises the
c135
Wine is not meant to work that way. You should see Wine as a separate
Windows. If you want to run applications under Wine either install them
under Wine or (with simple applications) copy them over from a Windows
install into ~/.wine/drive_c.
OK, it doesn't know where to find the DLLs
of MFC42u.DLL.)
OK, it doesn't know where to find the DLLs. Try making a symlink
to a place which (per the manpage) is always searched:
$ ls -l /winxp/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/mfc42u.dll
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 995384 Aug 23 2001
/winxp/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/mfc42u.dll
$ ln -s /winxp/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have installed wine-0.9.20 from ports, and
there's a Win98 FAT32 slice mounted on /windoze
deletia
How do I fix this?
I would start by upgrading and re-installing wine. You have
0.9.20; the current version is 0.9.55 and I believe there have
I have installed wine-0.9.20 from ports, and
there's a Win98 FAT32 slice mounted on /windoze
% grep -w windoze /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s1/windozemsdosfsro00
If I run Notepad, like this, it seems to work
% wine /windoze/WIN98/NOTEPAD.EXE
but if I then try to run Write:
%
all my 6.2 computers say the correct time, but my 7.0 BETA-2 says an hour
ahead (as in, it didnt make the DST change last night on its own). same
timezone is selected on all computers.
did i miss some setting to obey DST changes or something?
thanks,
--
Jonathan Horne
Jonathan Horne wrote:
all my 6.2 computers say the correct time, but my 7.0 BETA-2 says an hour
ahead (as in, it didnt make the DST change last night on its own). same
timezone is selected on all computers.
did i miss some setting to obey DST changes or something?
No mine are even wacker
oops on my previous post I ment it is 10:14 est not 11:14
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 4, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
all my 6.2 computers say the correct time, but my 7.0 BETA-2 says an
hour
ahead (as in, it didnt make the DST change last night on its own).
My 7.0 BETA1 machine switched to winter time just fine.
-j
On Sunday 04 November 2007 05:13:45 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Jonathan Horne wrote:
all my 6.2 computers say the correct time, but my 7.0 BETA-2 says an hour
ahead (as in, it didnt make the DST change last night on its own). same
timezone is selected on all computers.
did i miss some
Jonathan Horne wrote:
all my 6.2 computers say the correct time, but my 7.0 BETA-2 says an hour
ahead (as in, it didnt make the DST change last night on its own). same
timezone is selected on all computers.
did i miss some setting to obey DST changes or something?
thanks,
I have the
On Nov 4, 2007, at 4:02 PM, icantthinkofone wrote:
I have the correct time but it says CST for Central Standard. Why
doesn't it say CDST?
Standard time is what we have in the winter. Daylight Savings time is
what we have in the summer. I know this is counter-intuitive since we
are on
Hello - is this path work with freebsd 6.2 too?
Thanks
Lukas
--
Nie wiem, po co skrajna prawica pcha się do rządów.
Nie mogłaby po prostu wniebowstąpić?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:00:10 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
If you can live without the pretty pictures, you can configure Mutt to use
an external browser like lynx or links to display HTML.
Otherwise, you could give Claws a closer look.
^
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:47 +0200, Christian Baer wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:41:53 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Yeah I also like text based MUAs such as mutt or pine. Sometimes I get
HTML messages from my co-workers who use webmail. I must read those HTML
messages for my work, study.
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:47 +0200, Christian Baer wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:41:53 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Yeah I also like text based MUAs such as mutt or pine. Sometimes I get
HTML messages from my co-workers who use webmail. I must read those HTML
messages for my work, study.
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:34 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that,
Thunderbird is the
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:41:53 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Yeah I also like text based MUAs such as mutt or pine. Sometimes I get
HTML messages from my co-workers who use webmail. I must read those HTML
messages for my work, study. That's why I need windows-like MUAs, not
text based MUAs. Is
Hi there,
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that,
Thunderbird is the best MUA, indeed.
FYI, this is my information:
[EMAIL
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
I _really_ want to share opinions about this topic (Thunderbird's start
up speed) with you FreeBSD users.
What do you think of?
I use Thunderbird on my FreeBSD box without issue. FYI, 2.0.0.6 is the
latest, and I have no issue with its load times.
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that,
Thunderbird is the best MUA, indeed.
FYI, this is my
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:41 +0330, Bahman M. wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:19:49 +0900
Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:24:34PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:41 +0330, Bahman M. wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow.
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 12:45 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:24:34PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:41 +0330, Bahman M. wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 13:44 +0200, cpghost wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:19:49 +0900
Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow.
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that,
Thunderbird is the best MUA, indeed.
i use pine. others use mutt, elm etc. no need
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 01:02 -0700, Jay Chandler wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
I _really_ want to share opinions about this topic (Thunderbird's start
up speed) with you FreeBSD users.
What do you think of?
I use Thunderbird on my FreeBSD box without issue. FYI, 2.0.0.6 is the
On Monday 24 September 2007 07:19:49 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Hi there,
Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain
Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very
slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that,
Thunderbird
: update: Danger Will Robinson dmesg [ath pccard... ok on 6.1
600mhz laptop, same card *no* dmesg at all on 6.2 hp laptop]
To: User Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
update: several minutes after I pulled the ath0 out, I got a dmesg reading:
cbb0: Danger Will Robinson: Resource left allocated
Steve Franks wrote:
I sent this out over the weekend to no replies. Since dmesg
specifically states this is a bug, I assume someone would want to
know about it. I can reproduce the problem.
Steve
Hi Steve.
Perhaps you might have more success sending this to freebsd-hackers or
So, I don't have any dmesg, because I don't get one at all with my
ath0 card that I'm currently typing this on my old dell 600mhz laptop.
I also have a wi0 card that works on the 600mhz machine, but it gives
a freeze on the new system, and when you remove it, you get cbb0
ready never happened,
update: several minutes after I pulled the ath0 out, I got a dmesg reading:
cbb0: Danger Will Robinson: Resource left allocated! This is a
bug... (rid=0, type=1, addr=11)
cbb0: Danger Will Robinson: Resource left allocated! This is a bug...
(rid=0, type=4, addr=a100)
Steve
On 8/25/07, Steve
This is very strange - I can't get traceroute to work as I expect.
Forgive me if I'm being stupid as well as blind, but perusing the man
page for traceroute brings no joy.
It simply doesn't produce expected results - I don't think I'm on the
same network as www.freebsd.org, so where are the
zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org
traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms
very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as
192.168 suggest) is doing strange things...
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org
traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms
very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as
192.168 suggest) is doing
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
