Solved: Re: order in fstab and md/mfs (extra info)
Sorry, I found out, that md wasn't loaded as a module and not compiled into the kernel. MD_LOAD="YES" in /boot/loader.conf fixed the problem. Ronald. On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:10:18 +0100, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:02:09 +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: Hello, Today I noticed my mfs on /tmp not mounting properly, because of the order of the entries in fstab. Mfs can't be mounted too early. Is this meant to be or should there be a second stage for this mount, just like nfs mounts which are deferred until after the network is up. I saw it is documented in one line in 'man fstab', that order is important, but not many examples about this. Running 5.2-BETA cvsupped today on P-II 400Mhz (UP), 256 MB, IDE. It still fails with: mfs: mdconfig (attach) exited with error code 1 Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted Any hints? Same experiences? Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: order in fstab and md/mfs (extra info)
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:02:09 +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: Hello, Today I noticed my mfs on /tmp not mounting properly, because of the order of the entries in fstab. Mfs can't be mounted too early. Is this meant to be or should there be a second stage for this mount, just like nfs mounts which are deferred until after the network is up. I saw it is documented in one line in 'man fstab', that order is important, but not many examples about this. Running 5.2-BETA cvsupped today on P-II 400Mhz (UP), 256 MB, IDE. It still fails with: mfs: mdconfig (attach) exited with error code 1 Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted Any hints? Same experiences? Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
order in fstab and md/mfs
Hello, Today I noticed my mfs on /tmp not mounting properly, because of the order of the entries in fstab. Mfs can't be mounted too early. Is this meant to be or should there be a second stage for this mount, just like nfs mounts which are deferred until after the network is up. I saw it is documented in one line in 'man fstab', that order is important, but not many examples about this. Running 5.2-BETA cvsupped today on P-II 400Mhz (UP), 256 MB, IDE. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"