Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
I have a Debian server virtual ok with Proxmox. In one of the virtual machines is FreeBSD 9.1 ZFS with one disk to 100G. Free space is not enough, how to extend the virtual disk without losing data? Add another virtual disk and do a RAID0 - not an option. It is not clear how to distribute the data from the old virtual disk to the new virtual disk. The manual of the Proxmox http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Resizing_disks FreeBSD is not mentioned :( You may have to do a Native ZFS for Linux on Proxmox and it will be easier to resize the virtual disk for the virtual machines? -- Vladislav V. Prodan System Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
On May 11, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net wrote: Add another virtual disk and do a RAID0 - not an option. It is not clear how to distribute the data from the old virtual disk to the new virtual disk. When you add an additional disk to a zpool (to create a STRIPE), the ZFS code automatically stripes new writes across all top level vdevs (drinks in this case). You will see a performance penalty until the data distribution evens out. One way to force that (if you do NOT have snapshots) is to just copy everything. The new copy will be striped across all top level vdevs. The other option would be to add an additional disk that is as large as you want to the VM, attach it to the zpool as a mirror. The mirror vdev will only be as large as the original device, but once the mirror completes resilvering, you can remove the old device and grow the remaining device to full size (it may do that anyway based on the setting of the auto expand property of the zpool. The default under 9.1 is NOT to autoexpand: root@FreeBSD2:/root # zpool get autoexpand rootpool NAME PROPERTYVALUE SOURCE rootpool autoexpand off default root@FreeBSD2:/root # -- Paul Kraus Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
There's no mature (or flexible, or can do what I want ) way to
increase/decrease disk sizes in FreeBSD for now {ZFS,UFS}.
Best and quickest way - to have twice spare space, copy data, create new
sufficient disk and copy back.
2013/5/11 Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net
I have a Debian server virtual ok with Proxmox.
In one of the virtual machines is FreeBSD 9.1 ZFS with one disk to 100G.
Free space is not enough, how to extend the virtual disk without losing
data?
Add another virtual disk and do a RAID0 - not an option. It is not clear
how to distribute the data from the old virtual disk to the new virtual
disk.
The manual of the Proxmox http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Resizing_disksFreeBSD
is not mentioned :(
You may have to do a Native ZFS for Linux on Proxmox and it will be easier
to resize the virtual disk for the virtual machines?
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System Network Administrator
http://support.od.ua
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
___
freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
On May 11, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no mature (or flexible, or can do what I want ) way to
increase/decrease disk sizes in FreeBSD for now {ZFS,UFS}.
Best and quickest way - to have twice spare space, copy data, create new
sufficient disk and copy back.
Is this a statement or a question ? If a statement, then it is factually FALSE.
If it is supposed to be a question, it does not ask anything.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re[2]: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
On May 11, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net wrote: Add another virtual disk and do a RAID0 - not an option. It is not clear how to distribute the data from the old virtual disk to the new virtual disk. The other option would be to add an additional disk that is as large as you want to the VM, attach it to the zpool as a mirror. The mirror vdev will only be as large as the original device, but once the mirror completes resilvering, you can remove the old device and grow the remaining device to full size (it may do that anyway based on the setting of the auto expand property of the zpool. The default under 9.1 is NOT to autoexpand: root@FreeBSD2:/root # zpool get autoexpand rootpool NAME PROPERTYVALUE SOURCE rootpool autoexpand off default root@FreeBSD2:/root # Thanks. I did not realize that there was such an interesting and useful option :) # zpool get autoexpand tank NAME PROPERTYVALUE SOURCE tank autoexpand off default -- Vladislav V. Prodan System Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
On May 11, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net wrote: Thanks. I did not realize that there was such an interesting and useful option :) # zpool get autoexpand tank NAME PROPERTYVALUE SOURCE tank autoexpand off default The man pages for zpool and zfs are full of such useful information :-) -- Paul Kraus Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
2013/5/11 Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org
On May 11, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's no mature (or flexible, or can do what I want ) way to
increase/decrease disk sizes in FreeBSD for now {ZFS,UFS}.
Best and quickest way - to have twice spare space, copy data, create new
sufficient disk and copy back.
Is this a statement or a question ? If a statement, then it is factually
FALSE. If it is supposed to be a question, it does not ask anything.
It was a statement, and luckily I was partially wrong, as Vladislav did
made what he wanted to.
However, last time I checked there were no such easy ways to decrease
zpools or increase/decrease UFS partitions.
Or grow mirrored ZFS as easily as single zpool. Or (killer one) remove
added by mistake vdev from zpool ;)
Of course I'm not talking about real hw, rather virtual one.
If you happen to point me somewhere to have such task solved I'd be much
appreciated.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
On May 11, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/11 Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org
On May 11, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no mature (or flexible, or can do what I want ) way to
increase/decrease disk sizes in FreeBSD for now {ZFS,UFS}.
Best and quickest way - to have twice spare space, copy data, create new
sufficient disk and copy back.
Is this a statement or a question ? If a statement, then it is factually
FALSE. If it is supposed to be a question, it does not ask anything.
It was a statement, and luckily I was partially wrong, as Vladislav did made
what he wanted to.
However, last time I checked there were no such easy ways to decrease zpools
Correct, there is currently no way to decrease the size of a zpool. That would
require a defragmentation utility, which is on the roadmap as part of the
bp_rewrite code enhancement (and has been for many, many years :-)
or increase/decrease UFS partitions.
Or grow mirrored ZFS as easily as single zpool.
This one I do not understand. I have grown mirrored zpools many times. Let's
say you have a 2-way mirror of 1 TB drives. You can do one of two things to
grow the zpool:
1) add another pair of drives (of any size) as another top level vdev mirror
device (you *can* use a different type of top level vdev, raidZ, simple, etc,
but that is not recommended for both redundancy and performance predictability
reasons).
2) swap out one of the 1 TB drives for a 2 TB (zpool replace), you can even
offline one of the halves of the mirror to do this (but remember that you are
vulnerable to a failure of the remaining drive during the resolver period), let
the zpool resolver, then swap out the other 1 TB drive for a 2 TB. If the auto
expand property is set, then once the resolver finishes you have doubled your
net capacity.
Or (killer one) remove added by mistake vdev from zpool ;)
Don't make that mistake. Seriously. If you are managing storage you need to be
double checking every single command you issue if you care about your data
integrity. You could easily make the same complaint about issuing an 'rm -rf'
in the wrong directory (I know people who have done that). If you are using
snapshots you may be safe, if not your data is probably gone.
On the other hand, depending on where in the tree you added the vdev, you may
be able to remove it. If it is a top level vdev, then you have just changed the
configuration of the zpool. While very not supported, you just might be able,
using zdb and rolling back to a TXG before you added the device, remove the
vdev. A good place to ask that question and have the discussion would be the
ZFS discuss list at illumos (the list discussion is not limited to illumos, but
covers all aspects of ZFS on all platforms). Archives here:
http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182191/sort/time_rev/
Of course I'm not talking about real hw, rather virtual one.
Doesn't matter to ZFS, whether a drive is a physical, a partition, or a virtual
disk you perform the same operations.
If you happen to point me somewhere to have such task solved I'd be much
appreciated.
See above :-) Some of your issues I addressed above, others are not there (and
may never be).
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
Alexander Yerenkow wrote this message on Sat, May 11, 2013 at 18:13 +0300: zpools or increase/decrease UFS partitions. growfs(8) NAME growfs -- grow size of an existing ufs file system HISTORY The growfs utility first appeared in FreeBSD 4.4. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Could anybody tell me how to drive ATI Radeon X1300?
Dear everyone, A laptop (Acer Aspire 5100), and there's ATI Radeon X1300 on it. I've chose ati (general and radeon) driver in my xorg.conf, the X is fail to start: (EE) No devuces detected. could anybody tell me how to drive it? p.s. I searched the googel, and i found something named fglrx may works, but i can not find it in the driver list. any idea? Thanks. Janvier Pang ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What options to netstat will tell me what protocols are listening on what ports?
Hi, In Linux, I would normally use 'netstat -tl' to see a listing of all listening ports on the tcp protocol; however I'm not having as much luck in determining what options I need for netstat in FreeBSD. What are the options that I need to use? Andy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What options to netstat will tell me what protocols are listening on what ports?
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:04:07PM -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote: In Linux, I would normally use 'netstat -tl' to see a listing of all listening ports on the tcp protocol; however I'm not having as much luck in determining what options I need for netstat in FreeBSD. What are the options that I need to use? Andy How about sockstat(1) with the 'l'isten option? % sockstat -46l | grep tcp Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What options to netstat will tell me what protocols are listeningon what ports?
From: Andrew Falanga : Hi, : : In Linux, I would normally use 'netstat -tl' to see a listing of all : listening ports on the tcp protocol; however I'm not having as much luck in : determining what options I need for netstat in FreeBSD. What are the : options that I need to use? : : Andy See man sockstat Best, Jon ___ : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list : http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions : To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What options to netstat will tell me what protocols are listeningon what ports?
On Friday 22 December 2006 16:52, Jon Krause wrote: From: Andrew Falanga : Hi, : : In Linux, I would normally use 'netstat -tl' to see a listing of all : listening ports on the tcp protocol; however I'm not having as much luck in : determining what options I need for netstat in FreeBSD. What are the : options that I need to use? : : Andy See man sockstat Best, Jon Or netstat -p tcp -- FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #13: Sat Dec 16 15:42:22 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc pgpqgYyP0xxSS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: tell me
explain me about RAM, log, hardware,sysctl, PAE,net and mail That is a little beyond the scope of this questions Email list. Unless I don't understand what you are saying, you are asking basic questions about how computers are made and how operating systems are designed rather than just specific questions on how to do things in the FreeBSD operating system. So, if that is true, you need to either get a couple of good basic books on computers or take a class on computers and operating systems and networking. Ultra basic books or classes such as 'how to create business letters or send Email will not be good enough - you need something that tells you about what is inside the computer. Some of that you could get by using Google to search the web for articles on those subjects. But you would still get a very fragmented picture of things. Just in case I don't understand your question and what you are saying is not that you want to know what RAM or log means, but that you want to know about those things under FreeBSD, then I would suggest you first read through the FreeBSD Handbook which is available online in the FreeBSD.org website. Here is the address for the English version: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ Also, check the FAQ pages at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/ and the 'man' pages at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi Good luck, jerry - Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.Try it free. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tell me
On 7/21/06, batsaikhan tsedevsuren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: explain me about RAM, log, hardware,sysctl, PAE,net and mail i have one word for you RTFM ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tell me
On 7/21/06, jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/21/06, batsaikhan tsedevsuren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: explain me about RAM, log, hardware,sysctl, PAE,net and mail i have one word for you RTFM Get mail from dead onkle, explains fish. Buy net to catch fish. Make PAE (sic) from fish. RAM annoying car on road, flee. From fear of getting caught, make log from fish PAE (pie?). Log gets all over hardware, makes mess. Not idea what a sysctl is or does, mAybe try man pages. When going at it alone the F may get too M, I need to R more about this. I hope this helps. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tell me
explain me about RAM, log, hardware,sysctl, PAE,net and mail - See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com. Check it out. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tell me
explain me about RAM, log, hardware,sysctl, PAE,net and mail - Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.Try it free. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tell me
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:40:58 -0700 (PDT) batsaikhan tsedevsuren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day Batsaikhan! Firstly, let me just say that your email comes across as really rude - but I'm sure this is just a language thing! I'm not telling you off here, just trying to warn you in case you're not aware of it. explain me about RAM, log, hardware,sysctl, PAE,net and mail This is a hell of a request! The freebsd-questions mailing list isn't really here to explain how a computer works (e.g., about RAM, x86's PAE, etc.), nor how the Internet or email services work. It's about helping with FreeBSD-specific queries. I would therefore recommend using your favourite search engine to gain more information on these topics. As for sysctl, please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-sysctl.html I do apologise if you have trouble understanding what I'm trying to say here. If this is the case, feel free to email me off-list. -- Nick Withers email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.nickwithers.com Mobile: +61 414 397 446 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
I used the examples as a basis, and a little trial and error if things didn't work, so I eventually got a working supfile. However, it did some weird stuff, even though this should be downloading 6.0 stable (from what I can tell), I get errors in port builds (even without optimisation flags). On top of that, I tried to build my kernel, and when all was said and done, and it booted, it said 7.0 current. Is there a problem in my supfile, or is this just a HTF did you manage that?? error? I ran: $ cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile /etc/supfile *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00 # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Main Source Tree. # # The easiest way to get the main source tree is to use the src-all # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual src-* collections. src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. Thanks, -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
Jim, You currently have your default tag set to RELENG_6 (which is correct), but when you place tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entries, you override the default setting of RELENG_6. Remove the tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entires, cvsup again, and your sources should be updated with 6 STABLE. -David On 4/12/06, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used the examples as a basis, and a little trial and error if things didn't work, so I eventually got a working supfile. However, it did some weird stuff, even though this should be downloading 6.0 stable (from what I can tell), I get errors in port builds (even without optimisation flags). On top of that, I tried to build my kernel, and when all was said and done, and it booted, it said 7.0 current. Is there a problem in my supfile, or is this just a HTF did you manage that?? error? I ran: $ cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile /etc/supfile *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00 # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Main Source Tree. # # The easiest way to get the main source tree is to use the src-all # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual src-* collections. src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. Thanks, -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
Thanks, I'll try that again, however, when I've tried to do that, it has refused to update. On 4/12/06, David Stanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, You currently have your default tag set to RELENG_6 (which is correct), but when you place tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entries, you override the default setting of RELENG_6. Remove the tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entires, cvsup again, and your sources should be updated with 6 STABLE. -David On 4/12/06, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used the examples as a basis, and a little trial and error if things didn't work, so I eventually got a working supfile. However, it did some weird stuff, even though this should be downloading 6.0 stable (from what I can tell), I get errors in port builds (even without optimisation flags). On top of that, I tried to build my kernel, and when all was said and done, and it booted, it said 7.0 current. Is there a problem in my supfile, or is this just a HTF did you manage that?? error? I ran: $ cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile /etc/supfile *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00 # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Main Source Tree. # # The easiest way to get the main source tree is to use the src-all # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual src-* collections. src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. Thanks, -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 06:45, Jim Stapleton wrote: *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00 collections. src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. Thanks, -Jim Hi Jim, The line collections.src-all tag=. is your problem. A line like src-all would fix it. Since you want to follow 6-STABLE, I think you would be better off using three separate sup-files, which could be done like this: sup-src: *default tag=RELENG_6 *default host=cvsup8.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix src-all * sup-ports: *default tag=. *default host=cvsup8.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix ports-all * sup-doc: *default tag=. *default host=cvsup8.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix doc-all Don ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
David Stanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted: You currently have your default tag set to RELENG_6 (which is correct), but when you place tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entries, you override the default setting of RELENG_6. Remove the tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entires, cvsup again, and your sources should be updated with 6 STABLE. Only the src entry. Ports and doc should definitely be using HEAD (i.e., '.'). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
On 12 Apr 2006 09:23:09 -0400, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Stanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted: You currently have your default tag set to RELENG_6 (which is correct), but when you place tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entries, you override the default setting of RELENG_6. Remove the tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entires, cvsup again, and your sources should be updated with 6 STABLE. Only the src entry. Ports and doc should definitely be using HEAD (i.e., '.'). True. Really, I was just trying to get the concept across. :) -David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
Jim, What errors are you getting? I was able to cvsup using your supfile with no problem: *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00 # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Main Source Tree. # # The easiest way to get the main source tree is to use the src-all # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual src-* collections. src-all ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. su-2.05b# cvsup -g -L2 /etc/supfile Parsing supfile /etc/supfile Connecting to cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org Connected to cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org Server software version: SNAP_16_1h Negotiating file attribute support Exchanging collection information Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection Running Updating collection src-all/cvs Checkout src/COPYRIGHT Checkout src/LOCKS Checkout src/MAINTAINERS Checkout src/Makefile Checkout src/Makefile.inc1 Checkout src/ObsoleteFiles.inc Checkout src/README Checkout src/UPDATING Checkout src/bin/Makefile Checkout src/bin/Makefile.inc Checkout src/bin/cat/Makefile ... -David On 4/12/06, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, I'll try that again, however, when I've tried to do that, it has refused to update. On 4/12/06, David Stanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, You currently have your default tag set to RELENG_6 (which is correct), but when you place tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entries, you override the default setting of RELENG_6. Remove the tag=. next to your src, ports, and doc entires, cvsup again, and your sources should be updated with 6 STABLE. -David On 4/12/06, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used the examples as a basis, and a little trial and error if things didn't work, so I eventually got a working supfile. However, it did some weird stuff, even though this should be downloading 6.0 stable (from what I can tell), I get errors in port builds (even without optimisation flags). On top of that, I tried to build my kernel, and when all was said and done, and it booted, it said 7.0 current. Is there a problem in my supfile, or is this just a HTF did you manage that?? error? I ran: $ cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile /etc/supfile *default host=cvsup13.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default date=2006.04.01.12.00.00 # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Main Source Tree. # # The easiest way to get the main source tree is to use the src-all # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual src-* collections. src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. Thanks, -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I think I butchered my supfile - can anyone tell me why I get this result?
CVSUP gave no erros. As stated, my kernel compiled to 7.0-Current (o.O) $ cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome2/ $ make install # fails $ cd /usr/ports/multimedia/kbtv/ $ make install #fails There were a few others, but it'll be a while until I can get to the point of replicating any of these and having the explicit errors printable. as far as the CVSup I had this: src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. or this: src-all ports-all doc-all the former gave me the wrong kernel, the latter nuked my /usr/ports/*/ directories, except for distfiles, and one or two others. -Jim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
-t could work for you. Just check the man page it's at the top. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
Leonard Zettel wrote: On Saturday 10 September 2005 12:44 am, Mike Hernandez wrote: Have you tried explicitly telling fsck what file system it's going to be checking? Du What is the syntax for doing that? Assuming that's a serious question, a serious example would be: $ fsck /var HTH, Kevin Kinsey ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
On Saturday 10 September 2005 09:13 am, Kevin Kinsey wrote: Leonard Zettel wrote: On Saturday 10 September 2005 12:44 am, Mike Hernandez wrote: Have you tried explicitly telling fsck what file system it's going to be checking? Du What is the syntax for doing that? Assuming that's a serious question, a serious example would be: $ fsck /var A bit difficult to see how to apply that in the present context. If I understand things correctly, /var designates a mount point. I have my hardware set up to use swappable hard drives, with the idea of using one drive for backups, mounting it on /mnt for that purpose. But when I try to do that, mount won't mount (without -f). fsck won't fsck either, or at least gives me a message I don't understand. My (somewhat shallow) perusal of what documentation I can find suggests that fsck should be used on an unmounted file system (to guarantee its quiescence). So what, other than the device designation, do I hand off to fsck? Or should I force the mount and then use fsck? -LenZ- HTH, Kevin Kinsey ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Leonard Zettel wrote: When I issue the followinf command: mount /dev/ad1s1c /mnt I get the response WARNING: R/W mount of /mnt denied. filesystem is not clean - run fsck mount: /dev/ad1s1c: Operation not premitted Then when I try fsck /dev/ad1s1c I get fsck: exec fsck_unused for /dev/ad1s1c in sbin: /usr/sbin: No such file or directory BTW, mount -f /dev/ad1s1c /mnt gets me what I expect, but the hassle leading up to it has me scared to death. Now what? punt? You're using the default whole slice partition, ad1s1c. My guess is, you're using the default disklabel for that slice. If you look at that disklabel, # disklabel ad1s1 you'll see a line like this: c: 1563014250unused0 0 # raw part, don't edit Now, fsck uses external helper utilities to check the consistency of various types of filesystem. If the filesystem has an entry in /etc/fstab, it'll pull the type from there if you specify the mount point. If you specify the device, it looks like fsck is using the disklabel rather than actually tasting the partition to determine what fsck to use. You can fix this by disklabelling your device and fixing the type of partition c: this should be ok. You can probably also tell fsck explicitly what type of filesystem to check, or just invoke the appropriate fsck_ufs directly. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Usenet: The separation of content AND presentation - simultaneously. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
On 2005-09-09 14:45, Leonard Zettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 10 September 2005 12:44 am, Mike Hernandez wrote: Have you tried explicitly telling fsck what file system it's going to be checking? Du What is the syntax for doing that? fsck -t fstype device-node ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
On 9/10/05, Jan Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're using the default whole slice partition, ad1s1c. My guess is, you're using the default disklabel for that slice. Jan is right. The only time I've had the above issue though, was when I was trying to fsck an ext2 partition without having the proper stuff installed (e2fsprogs). My error though, of course, was fsck: exec fsck_ext2fs., as opposed to fsck_unused. In this case it looks like fsck is doing what it can but as Jan said, the type for the c partition is unused. Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
On Saturday 10 September 2005 11:20 am, Jan Grant wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Leonard Zettel wrote: When I issue the followinf command: mount /dev/ad1s1c /mnt I get the response WARNING: R/W mount of /mnt denied. filesystem is not clean - run fsck mount: /dev/ad1s1c: Operation not premitted Then when I try fsck /dev/ad1s1c I get fsck: exec fsck_unused for /dev/ad1s1c in sbin: /usr/sbin: No such file or directory BTW, mount -f /dev/ad1s1c /mnt gets me what I expect, but the hassle leading up to it has me scared to death. Now what? punt? You're using the default whole slice partition, ad1s1c. My guess is, you're using the default disklabel for that slice. If you look at that disklabel, # disklabel ad1s1 you'll see a line like this: c: 1563014250unused0 0 # raw part, don't edit Well, sort of. If I knew what I were doing, I'd be dangerous So thanks to all, you gave me enough clues to work things through. Turns out the drive had one FreeBSD slice and a bunch of unused space. fsk on ad1s1a cleared tings up. -LenZ- Now, fsck uses external helper utilities to check the consistency of various types of filesystem. If the filesystem has an entry in /etc/fstab, it'll pull the type from there if you specify the mount point. If you specify the device, it looks like fsck is using the disklabel rather than actually tasting the partition to determine what fsck to use. You can fix this by disklabelling your device and fixing the type of partition c: this should be ok. You can probably also tell fsck explicitly what type of filesystem to check, or just invoke the appropriate fsck_ufs directly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is fsck trying to tell me?
When I issue the followinf command: mount /dev/ad1s1c /mnt I get the response WARNING: R/W mount of /mnt denied. filesystem is not clean - run fsck mount: /dev/ad1s1c: Operation not premitted Then when I try fsck /dev/ad1s1c I get fsck: exec fsck_unused for /dev/ad1s1c in sbin: /usr/sbin: No such file or directory BTW, mount -f /dev/ad1s1c /mnt gets me what I expect, but the hassle leading up to it has me scared to death. Now what? punt? -LenZ- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
Have you tried explicitly telling fsck what file system it's going to be checking? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is fsck trying to tell me?
On Saturday 10 September 2005 12:44 am, Mike Hernandez wrote: Have you tried explicitly telling fsck what file system it's going to be checking? Du What is the syntax for doing that? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone tell me why my local cvsup mirror is failing?
stan wrote: I went to update some machines this weekend, to find that my local cvsup mirror is not getting updated. Here is the log file: CVSup update begins at 2004-12-12 11:17:00 Updating from cvsup11.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup11.freebsd.org Updating collection cvs-all/cvs Append to CVSROOT-ports/commitlogs/ports Append to CVSROOT-src/commitlogs/sys Edit ports/lang/scm/Makefile,v Create ports/lang/scm/files/patch-eval.c,v Edit ports/print/scribus/Makefile,v Edit src/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c,v src/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c,v: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file Edit src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/readme/article.sgml,v src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/readme/article.sgml,v: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file Edit src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/relnotes/common/new.sgml,v src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/relnotes/common/new.sgml,v: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file Edit src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c,v Skipping collection gnats/current Updating collection www/current Updater failed: /usr/local/etc/cvsup/prefixes/FreeBSD-www.current/data/FAQ/#cvs.cvsup-83855.11: Cannot create: Permission denied CVSup update ends at 2004-12-12 11:21:56 Ive done a chomd -R cvsupin on /usr/local/etc/cvsu, and a chgrp -R cvsup on it to. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? I run my boxes off of cvsup12 and cvsup11, and haven't seen problems, but it's been a week or so since I grabbed any source. Sure looks like a simple permissions error to me. You're running cvsup as root? Kevin Kinsey ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone tell me why my local cvsup mirror is failing?
I went to update some machines this weekend, to find that my local cvsup mirror is not getting updated. Here is the log file: CVSup update begins at 2004-12-12 11:17:00 Updating from cvsup11.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup11.freebsd.org Updating collection cvs-all/cvs Append to CVSROOT-ports/commitlogs/ports Append to CVSROOT-src/commitlogs/sys Edit ports/lang/scm/Makefile,v Create ports/lang/scm/files/patch-eval.c,v Edit ports/print/scribus/Makefile,v Edit src/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c,v src/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c,v: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file Edit src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/readme/article.sgml,v src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/readme/article.sgml,v: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file Edit src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/relnotes/common/new.sgml,v src/release/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/relnotes/common/new.sgml,v: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file Edit src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c,v Skipping collection gnats/current Updating collection www/current Updater failed: /usr/local/etc/cvsup/prefixes/FreeBSD-www.current/data/FAQ/#cvs.cvsup-83855.11: Cannot create: Permission denied CVSup update ends at 2004-12-12 11:21:56 Ive done a chomd -R cvsupin on /usr/local/etc/cvsu, and a chgrp -R cvsup on it to. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? -- They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please tell me which tool do the same work as wget?
Dear sir: In FreeBSD5.2.1 I have installed a wget1.9, but it doesn't work, report: %wget --version /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.4 not found Now I want to know: 1. Is there another tool do the same work as wget? 2. Which package should I install?( I had install linux-base-7.1_5 ) Thanks! Liu Haixiao __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please tell me which tool do the same work as wget?
On Friday, 10 December 2004 at 19:59:54 -0800, Liu Haixiao wrote: Dear sir: In FreeBSD5.2.1 I have installed a wget1.9, but it doesn't work, report: wget --version /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.4 not found How did you install it? Now I want to know: 1. Is there another tool do the same work as wget? There are a number. 2. Which package should I install?( I had install linux-base-7.1_5 ) It looks to me as if you've installed a Linux binary. Before trying to fix that installation, try installing the wget port: # cd /usr/ports/net/wget # make install Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgpbL9wd6gA1P.pgp Description: PGP signature
