Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread Shaun Amott
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:16:18PM +0100, mato wrote: > > Matthew, that is a great answer!! > Thank you! :-) > > The last question would be how to make make(1) /portupgrade/portsystem > to ignore FORBIDDEN. > "make -DNO_IGNORE" will get around this. But bypassing FORBIDDEN is generally not wise

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread mato
Matthew Seaman wrote: > mato wrote: > >> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote >> >>> mato wrote: >>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: is forbidden: Remote c

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
mato wrote: > On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote >> mato wrote: >>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote >>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: >>> is forbidden: Remote code execution: >>> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread mato
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote > mato wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: > > is forbidden: Remote code execution: > > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e43

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread Vince
mato wrote: > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote > ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: > is forbidden: Remote code execution: > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html > > Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-07 Thread mato
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote > > >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: > > >> is forbidden: Remote code execution: > > >> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html > > >> > > >> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-06 Thread Josh Carroll
>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs: >> is forbidden: Remote code execution: >> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html >> >> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ? You need to make config in /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-cod

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-06 Thread martinko
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote: >> Hello, >> >> According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port >> (3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version >> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit

Re: portupgrade refusin to upgrade a port .. when it shouldn't imho

2006-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote: > Hello, > > According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port > (3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version > win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit refuse > me to do so: > >

Re: upgrade a port

2004-04-23 Thread Chiang Seng Chang
exactly what i am looking for, thx. -cs Lowell Gilbert wrote: Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chiang Seng Chang writes: portupgrade wont work because ver 22 was not installed in the first place. pkg_deinstall ver 21 wont work because there are dependencies. portinstall ver 22 wont work

Re: upgrade a port

2004-04-23 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chiang Seng Chang writes: > > > portupgrade wont work because ver 22 was not installed in the > > first place. > > > > pkg_deinstall ver 21 wont work because there are dependencies. > > > > portinstall ver 22 wont work because ver 21 is there. > >

Re: upgrade a port

2004-04-23 Thread Robert Huff
Chiang Seng Chang writes: > portupgrade wont work because ver 22 was not installed in the > first place. > > pkg_deinstall ver 21 wont work because there are dependencies. > > portinstall ver 22 wont work because ver 21 is there. > > how do i get out of this catch-22 ? pkg_dele

Re: upgrade a port

2004-04-23 Thread Chiang Seng Chang
portupgrade wont work because ver 22 was not installed in the first place. pkg_deinstall ver 21 wont work because there are dependencies. portinstall ver 22 wont work because ver 21 is there. how do i get out of this catch-22 ? -cs John Oxley wrote: On Fri 2004-04-23 (11:18), Chiang Seng Chang

Re: upgrade a port

2004-04-23 Thread John Oxley
On Fri 2004-04-23 (11:18), Chiang Seng Chang wrote: > currently i have openldap client 2.1 installed. > > $ pkg_glob -r openldap-client-2.1.30 > openldap-client-2.1.30 > kdeutils-3.2.2 > kdebase-3.2.2 > kdenetwork-3.2.2 > kdegraphics-3.2.2 > kdegames-3.2.2 > kdelibs-3.2.2 > gnupg-1.2.4_1 > samba-3

upgrade a port

2004-04-23 Thread Chiang Seng Chang
currently i have openldap client 2.1 installed. $ pkg_glob -r openldap-client-2.1.30 openldap-client-2.1.30 kdeutils-3.2.2 kdebase-3.2.2 kdenetwork-3.2.2 kdegraphics-3.2.2 kdegames-3.2.2 kdelibs-3.2.2 gnupg-1.2.4_1 samba-3.0.3.p2_1,1 if i want to use version 2.2, do i just simply: > pkg_deinstal

Portupgrade failing to upgrade a port

2003-02-25 Thread Marc LeMaire
Hello you all, I've made a complete reinstall, made a make world, recompiled the kernel during the last week-end. So I've come to the last step of syncronizing my port tree. While upgrading my ports, I've got this while updating XF86-clients