On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:54:47PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:02:12AM -0600, Randy Belk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
> > wrote:
> > > The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5,
> > > even though
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:08:41PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
>
> > The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5,
> > even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean
> > the corresp
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
> The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5,
> even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean
> the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and shouldn't be there, or
> i
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:02:12AM -0600, Randy Belk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
> > The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5,
> > even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean
> > the corresponding
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5,
> even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean
> the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and shouldn't be there, or
> is there
The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5,
even though I have rebooted the box many times since. Does this mean
the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and shouldn't be there, or is
there
still some process attached to ttyp5?
ouput of w:
USER
