[Fwd: Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599]

2005-08-11 Thread Igor Robul
---BeginMessage--- Joel Rees wrote: I have two which reliably fail if you put TWO disks on them in a gmirror config within minutes of starting a make buildworld. Pardon the interruption, but is this two drives on one channel? Two drives can not be on one channel on SATA controller.

Re: 5-STABLE cpufreq hotter than est from ports

2005-08-11 Thread Nate Lawson
Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:35:29 +0200 From: Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:22:02AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: A couple days ago I updated my system and was excited to see cpufreq and powerd in 5-stable. Since then

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599

2005-08-11 Thread Igor Robul
Maxim M. Kazachek wrote: SoftModems works (well, almost) perfectly under Windows. Some of these works under Linux. SoftModems is the best, because they are cheap and works under Windows. The FreeBSD is puny OS just because they lack support of Software modem. The thing is as worth as much you

Re: 5.3-RELEASE (amd64) on LSILogic 1030 / mpt controller.

2005-08-11 Thread Krzysztof Kowalik
Krzysztof Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying, without success, to install the FreeBSD 5.3 on a Sun Fire V40z (it's an amd64 box) on its LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 SCSI controller. Interesting. 5.3-RELEASE for x86 works on the same machine, same disks connected to the same controller

Re: VIA vt6202 controller not recognised by FreeBSD 5.4-Release (ehci)

2005-08-11 Thread Björn König
Mark Sergeant wrote: Output from pciconf -lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:2 class=0x0c0320 card=0x12340925 chip=0x31041106 rev=0x51 hdr=0x00 vendor= 'VIA Technologies Inc' device= 'VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller' class= serial bus subclass= USB The same card

Re: IPv6 router solicitation not being received

2005-08-11 Thread Mark Andrews
Could you try this patch? Since I don't have SMC 83c170 card, I cannot test it by myself. Index: sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c diff -u -p sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c.orig sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c --- sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c.orig Tue Oct 29 10:43:49 2002 +++ sys/dev/tx/if_tx.cThu Aug 11 17:47:45 2005 @@

Re: 5.3-RELEASE (amd64) on LSILogic 1030 / mpt controller.

2005-08-11 Thread Krzysztof Kowalik
Krzysztof Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And 5-STABLE (installed snapshot from the end of January and upgraded to a recent -STABLE) works fine. I love to answer to myself. And, despite my hopes, 5.4-RELEASE/amd64 does not work again. I think I'm getting unlucky recently. And

Re: 5.3-RELEASE (amd64) on LSILogic 1030 / mpt controller.

2005-08-11 Thread Björn König
Krzysztof Kowalik wrote: And 6.0-BETA2 works fine. Did someone forget to merge some fixes for mpt from RELENG_5 to RELENG_5_4? [...] It might be a candidate for an errata notice. Those fixes won't go without saying into a previously released branch. Björn

Re: VIA vt6202 controller not recognised by FreeBSD 5.4-Release (ehci)

2005-08-11 Thread Mark Sergeant
Mark Sergeant wrote: Output from pciconf -lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:2 class=0x0c0320 card=0x12340925 chip=0x31041106 rev=0x51 hdr=0x00 vendor= 'VIA Technologies Inc' device= 'VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller' class= serial bus subclass= USB The same

Re: IPv6 router solicitation not being received

2005-08-11 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:28:40 +1000 Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Mark_Andrews I can't see how that can have any effect as the shift Mark_Andrews is only 0..15 (0xf). Mark_Andrews filter[h 4] |= 1 (h 0xF); Yup, you are right. I focused attention only on the

BTW (SiI chipsets, SATA, explosions) - CURRENT also blows up

2005-08-11 Thread Karl Denninger
7.0-CURRENT blows up just as reliably, and in exactly the same way (with DANGER WILL ROBINSON complaints) as 6.0-BETA2 does here on my sandbox machine. The only addition is that 7.0 panics into the debugger some of the time as well. and, like 6.0-BETA2 when it does blow up you can't reboot

RE: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request)LBA=11441599

2005-08-11 Thread Vinod Kashyap
I have two controllers here that are from different manufacturers and both exhibit the same problem. The SAME disks (two different manufacturers - hitachi and maxtor) on a motherboard ICH5 adapter work perfectly, smartmontools says all 4 (I have two examples of each) are healthy, and

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request)LBA=11441599

2005-08-11 Thread Karl Denninger
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:44:52PM -0700, Vinod Kashyap wrote: I have two controllers here that are from different manufacturers and both exhibit the same problem. The SAME disks (two different manufacturers - hitachi and maxtor) on a motherboard ICH5 adapter work perfectly,

RE: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retryingrequest)LBA=11441599

2005-08-11 Thread Vinod Kashyap
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl Denninger Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:25 PM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retryingrequest)LBA=11441599 On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at

Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retryingrequest)LBA=11441599

2005-08-11 Thread Karl Denninger
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:29:02PM -0700, Vinod Kashyap wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux, it applies to FreeBSD as well. You have to use '-d 3ware,N' with every command, where N is the unit #. Ex: smartctl -H -A -d 3ware,1 /dev/twed

Installing 5.4-S on nvidia raid1?

2005-08-11 Thread Brandon Fosdick
I have a DFI Lanparty nf4 Ultra-D with two 80GB drives configured as a raid1 array. The bios lists the array as scsi-0 and claims that its healthy. When I boot from the disc1 cd and try to do the usual install the only device options I'm given for fdisk are ad4 and ad6, which obviously aren't