Re: 6.0 on VMWare 5.0: `calcru: negative runtime of -12728437 usec for pid 28 (irq17: lnc0)'

Lev Serebryakov wrote this message on Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:53 +0300: Hello freebsd-stable, FreeBSD 6.0 on VMWare 5.0 prints such messages every 3-4 minute. Also, messages like calcru: runtime went backwards from 40644816 to 40005944 usec for pid 3 (g_up) is shown routinely.

Re: 6.0 on VMWare 5.0: `calcru: negative runtime of -12728437 usec for pid 28 (irq17: lnc0)'

Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello freebsd-stable, FreeBSD 6.0 on VMWare 5.0 prints such messages every 3-4 minute. Also, messages like calcru: runtime went backwards from 40644816 to 40005944 usec for pid 3 (g_up) is shown routinely. timecounter is ACPI-safe, kernel is GENERIC one.

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

Miguel wrote this message on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 14:09 -0600: John-Mark Gurney wrote: GENERIC is already so large, that if you want/need a smaller kernel, you're going to rebuild anyways, Since I care about that extra 2megs, I recompiled my own kernel, And the real problem of a big

Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

Hi I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239, all the latest from ports. The problem I have is this: If i have LoadModule python_module

ndis and FBSD6.0

Hello! I have a IBM laptop T40 with a builtin wireless adapter (Intel 2100BG). For some time now I have been using the ipw driver, but I find i rather unstable and it makes my system freeze quite often. So I have installed ndis as U used to do it on 5.4, but i seems that it can't bind to a

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2005-11-09 08:12:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-09 08:12:53 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2005-11-09 08:12:53 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-09 08:13:46 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-09 08:13:46 - cd

Re: Tun and ALTQ

It seems that it work. Thanks. Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify em, for tun, vice versa... what a mess, hehe. Cuk Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:00:32AM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote: Resend... Please, does anyone have any ideas... What is the

upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap. So I was wondering hether I could just do this from source without any ill effects, as if I was upgrading

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

On 09/11/05, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap. So I was wondering hether I could just do this from

Re: ndis and FBSD6.0

On Mer 9 novembre 2005 08:47, Mikkel Skærris wrote: Hello! hello, I have a IBM laptop T40 with a builtin wireless adapter (Intel 2100BG). For some time now I have been using the ipw driver, but I find i rather unstable and it makes my system freeze quite often. So I have installed ndis as

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap. So I was wondering hether I could just do this from source

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap. So I was wondering hether I could just do this from source without any ill effects, as if I was upgrading

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

I did this on a Sun Ultra5 system last night. I forgot (as I usually do) mergemaster -p. But everything worked fine. The -p usually just catches missing users and such that could cause install problems. Claus Guttesen wrote: *** This message has been scanned by the InterScan

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

Oliver Fromme wrote: *** This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to be free of known security risks. ***-*** Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole machine

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

John-Mark Gurney wrote: Miguel wrote this message on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 14:09 -0600: I dont understand exactly why do you have to recompile, unless a new future is needed, like SMP, isnt it?, what harm is doing those extra megs? In the general case, no, you do not need to

FreeBSD 6.0 and Intel ICH6 UDMA100 controller on HP DL320-G3

Hello, i just tried to install FreeBSD-6.0 on a HP DL320 box. It seems that FreeBSD cant mount the S-ATA Harddrives attached to the onboard Intel ICH6 UDMA100 controller any more, with FreeBSD-5.4 it works. Following the dmesg output (boot -v): --- Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD

[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

TB --- 2005-11-09 14:06:05 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-09 14:06:05 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2005-11-09 14:06:06 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-09 14:07:03 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-09 14:07:03 -

Re: [releng_5 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

this one is eating my breakfast (too early for lunch here:-) randy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

Hi there, short additional step: Claus Guttesen wrote: The easiest would be to 1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0) 1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf * 2. cd /usr/src 3. make buildworld 4. make buildkernel 5. make installkernel 6. mergemaster -p 7. reboot into single-usermode and

Panic using an USB gps with uplcom

Hi, Using a RELENG_6_0 from this morning, I got the panic message : Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc061de49 stack pointer = 0x28:0xcad86afc frame

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

While we're nit-picking ... ;-) Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: short additional step: Claus Guttesen wrote: The easiest would be to 1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0) 1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf * 2. cd /usr/src 3. make buildworld 4. make

Re: psm0 broken with acpi_ibm on 6.0-RELEASE

Am 09.11.2005 um 04:55 schrieb Brian Buchanan: On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Petr Holub wrote: I've found the following problem on my IBM T41p when running 6.0- RELEASE: when both psm and acpi_ibm are compiled in the kernel, the psm0 device (touchpad) doesn't initialize properly - with verbose

Re: 6.0 on VMWare 5.0: `calcru: negative runtime of -12728437 usec for pid 28 (irq17: lnc0)'

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:13, Nate Lawson wrote: Try using TSC or i8254: sysctl kern.MUMBLE.timecounter=TSC (developers@ removed from cc:) Also, consider setting host.useFastclock = FALSE in your server's .vmx file. This makes all the difference for a Linux guest OS, along

Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. Under 5.4-R I could have 1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic: /dev/da0s1d723G 54G611G 8%/home Certainly not what I

Re: How to get FreeBSD 5.4 installed on Compaq Presario R3000 serie ?

Hi all, I've found finally the solution on http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-mobile/2005-May/006369.html. And there is a patched kernel for Compaq R3000 available to download. Now FreeBSD 5.4 is installed on my Compaq, great ! Many thanks to george+freebsd at m5p.com*, *the author

Re: Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was assigned to it. I'd check on the running box but: koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0 disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported /dev only shows: koth# ls /dev/da0* /dev/da0/dev/da0s1 /dev/da0s1c

Re: 5-stable kernel hang during boot

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote: See my posts and others on these topics: critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4) 5.3 - 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2) [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing Thanks for the pointers. I have not been able

5.4 - 6.0 gre changes?

Hello! After updating from 5.4 to 6.0 - which went absolutely painless, BTW - I'm having a little difficulty getting my gre tunnel to the office intranet to work. This is the only thread I found via google, that possibly matches my problem. Unfortunately I cannot read Russian.

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:35:59 +0100, Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, short additional step: Claus Guttesen wrote: The easiest would be to 1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0) 1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf * 2. cd /usr/src 3. make buildworld 4. make

gnome-upgrade.sh

This script is one of the most frustrating things ever written. I made a fresh install (from CD) of 6.0R. In the install I added gnome2, sudo, and bash. That's it. Gnome came up fine. bash is great, sudo works. Now, since gnome 2.12 is out, I want to upgrade to that. Seems resonable.

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote: This script is one of the most frustrating things ever written. I made a fresh install (from CD) of 6.0R. In the install I added gnome2, sudo, and bash. That's it. Gnome came up fine. bash is great, sudo works. Now, since gnome 2.12

Re: 5-stable kernel hang during boot

On 09 Nov Paul Keusemann wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote: See my posts and others on these topics: critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4) 5.3 - 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2) [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing Thanks

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote: 7. reboot into single-usermode and verify your new kernel works How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote? (Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in single-usermode is.) /etc/ttys # If console is marked insecure, then init will ask

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote: This script is one of the most frustrating things ever written. [Snip] As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider using sysutils/portmanager, all you need do is run portmanager

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:18:11 +0100, Michal 'max' Marciniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote: 7. reboot into single-usermode and verify your new kernel works How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote? (Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 14:41, Alistair wrote: Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote: This script is one of the most frustrating things ever written. [Snip] As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider using

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote: Hi I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239, all the latest from ports. The problem

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Colin Percival wrote: I find this argument hard to accept. The vast majority of FreeBSD users will never need the NFS_ROOT option, and many systems do not even have the hardware for serial or parallel ports, yet those are supported in the GENERIC

Re: gnome-terminal and locale support

Hi! Locale not supported by C library, locale unchanged This is not a specific problem of gnome-terminal. I receive this message also for xfce4, gqview, and etc. Looks like problem appears after updating with 'make world' from 5.4 to 6.0 (in my case). I reinstalled some ports and problem

Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R

Hello, I upgraded my amd64 installation to 6.0-RELEASE, and I am no longer able to use X. It exits with a signal 11 error. I have recompiled from ports, installed from packages from freebsd.org and performed a clean installation from an i386 6.0-R cd again installing from both port

Fails to boot after buildworld

Hey all, I don't know if this is a bug somewhere in the source but my system will not boot after I buildworld FreeBSD 6.0. I get the error: Can't work out which disk to boot from This error occurs right after the loader is booted and before the FreeBSD menu. System of course stalls here and

Re: 5-stable kernel hang during boot

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:00:09PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 09 Nov Paul Keusemann wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote: See my posts and others on these topics: critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4) 5.3 - 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel

Re: Fails to boot after buildworld

On 2005-11-09 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I don't know if this is a bug somewhere in the source but my system will not boot after I buildworld FreeBSD 6.0. I get the error: Can't work out which disk to boot from This error occurs right after the loader is booted and before

Re: AGP ceased to work on eMachines M5310 laptop

Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2005, 23:41 -0500 schrieb Mike Jakubik: Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote: [...] I don't know. ENOTIME, maybe? CC'ing anholt. I emailed him in private, he is simply too busy. I have tried it with 6-STABLE, and it

Re: Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:09:50PM -0700, Barkley Vowk wrote: No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was assigned to it. I'd check on the running box but: koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0 disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported Exactly from