lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only me? danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HEADS UP: MFC of local_startup changes to rc.d complete

2005-12-22 Thread Doug Barton
Greg Rivers wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Doug Barton wrote: As has been discussed for a couple weeks now, I have MFC'ed to RELENG_6 the changes in /etc/rc* that bring new-style boot scripts from the local_startup directories (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d and /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d) into the

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-22 Thread Spil Oss
As a FreeBSD-n00b with some 'friends' that know FreeBSD better/well I can only say Please add this kind of information to the Handbook Any addition to the handbook on tracking down problems and smarter ways to fix things would be greatly appreciated. I found myself recompiling my kernel to test

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: hi, this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). the em performance under

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, D one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is D a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). D D the em performance under 6.0-stable

PANIC (g_vfs_done()) on RELENG_6

2005-12-22 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Hello, the following error occured on my new RELENG_6 server from yesterday: gune:/#34: cpdup -X .cvsjail -X INTERN -X PUBLIC /server/ /mnt/ ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=75285888 ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=75290368 ad4: detached unknown: TIMEOUT

HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

2005-12-22 Thread Doug Barton
I should have said this in my last heads up message, sorry for forgetting about this important detail. The new code tries to run any script in a local_startup directory (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d and /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d) that has the execute bit set. So, if there is a script in one of

panic with RELENG_6, 2005-11-09 source

2005-12-22 Thread Rory Arms
I'm not subscribed to the list, so include me in any replies. Now the report... I'm reporting a kernel panic with a 6.0-STABLE machine using RELENG_6 source from 2006-11-09. It was triggered when I ran the command ifconfig ath0 pureg as an attempt to switch the D-Link G520 running in

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: Dthis particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, D one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is D a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). D D the em performance under

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D D Server listening on TCP port 5001 D TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D D [ 4] local 132.65.16.100 port

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D D Server listening on TCP port 5001 D TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D D [ 4] local 132.65.16.100

Re: panic with RELENG_6, 2005-11-09 source

2005-12-22 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Rory Arms wrote: I'm not subscribed to the list, so include me in any replies. So that explains the spam I get via this list... It's a spam magnet. -- Dave ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D D D D Server listening on TCP port 5001 D D TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D D

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only me? You'll have to be more specific: do you get that by doing only 'lsof' or are you using any parameters? _Do you run as a normal user, or

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D D D D Server listening on TCP port 5001 D D TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D D

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only me? You'll have to be more specific: do you get that by doing only 'lsof' or are you using any parameters? _Do you run as a normal

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:36:40 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: shuttle-3 lsof -v lsof version information: I forgot that one, here it is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lsof -v lsof version information: revision: 4.77 latest revision: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/

Re: gvinum: adding plex and subdisks to existing volume panic

2005-12-22 Thread Ludo Koren
Unfortunately, that doesn't help me at all, since there's no debugging info. Have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-kld.html. sorry I realized it late... Here is the info: Script started on Thu Dec 22 12:25:56 2005 501

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only me? both as a normal user and as root. I don't see the message you are

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only me? both as a normal user and as root. I don't see the

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:51, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only

Re: gmirror SCSI+IDE

2005-12-22 Thread Ivan Voras
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: For some funny reasons, I'll probably have to setup a gmirror between a SCSI disk device and a IDE one, and won't have much time for testing. So Might have bad performance, who

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:51, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it

Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode

2005-12-22 Thread Yuri Khotyaintsev
I have updated kernel/world today on the system which was running without any problems since I installed it (old kernel is from November 28) and i got this panic 10 minutes after boot (dmesg is attached below). The system is running FreeBSD/amd64 6-STABLE, SMP. [EMAIL

Re: lsof on 6.0

2005-12-22 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:27, Danny Braniss wrote: Do you have a mount which is a symlink? no, but many nfs. minbari mount 132.65.16.100:/d/6 on / (nfs) Breakpoint 1 at 0x402779: file dmnt.c, line 159. (gdb) run Starting program:

Re: Bug[?] In new local_startup and postgresql

2005-12-22 Thread Gary Smith
After a today upgrade to 6-STABLE postgresql doesn't start at boot. Strange beavior, if I run `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/010.pgsql.sh start' it starts correctly. 010.pgsql.sh is the same of updated ports. This is 010.pgsql.sh : http://www.deana.it/010.pgsql.sh Doug, this is resuls of

Re: Bug[?] In new local_startup and postgresql

2005-12-22 Thread Cristiano Deana
2005/12/22, Gary Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have the same problem the error on startup is: pg_ctl: unrecognized operation mode faststart try pg_ctl --help for more information Same for me. Look at doug's reply: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-December/028298.html --

Re: panic with RELENG_6, 2005-11-09 source

2005-12-22 Thread Sam Leffler
Rory Arms wrote: I'm not subscribed to the list, so include me in any replies. Now the report... I'm reporting a kernel panic with a 6.0-STABLE machine using RELENG_6 source from 2006-11-09. It was triggered when I ran the command ifconfig ath0 pureg as an attempt to switch the D-Link

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Jack Vogel
On 12/22/05, Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D D D D Server listening on TCP port 5001 D D

Re: HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

2005-12-22 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Doug Barton wrote this message on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:50 -0800: I should have said this in my last heads up message, sorry for forgetting about this important detail. The new code tries to run any script in a local_startup directory (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d and

Re: HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

2005-12-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:45:06AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Doug Barton wrote this message on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:50 -0800: I should have said this in my last heads up message, sorry for forgetting about this important detail. The new code tries to run any script in a

Re: HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

2005-12-22 Thread Doug Barton
John-Mark Gurney wrote: Also, how will this effect cups which installs a .sample file? and any other port that does this? Brooks already answered the first part of your question, so I'll just add here that .sample is already being ignored, along with a few other extensions, but it's safer

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006. On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:00:21PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote: While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one release cycle and come up with a binary update

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:55:33AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: Doesn't creating a binary updates system that's going to be practical to use require implementation of that old and exceedingly bikesheddable subject: packaging up the base system? EXACTLY. That's why we need core team

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:55:33AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: Doesn't creating a binary updates system that's going to be practical to use require implementation of that old and exceedingly bikesheddable subject: packaging up the base system? On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:13:09PM -0500,

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:00:21PM -0800 I heard the voice of Joe Rhett, and lo! it spake thus: Increasing the number of deployed systems out of date [...] On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:25PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: This doesn't make any sense. If you install a 6.0 system, in 6

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:08:07PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: So, when will you fix it? Or hire someone to fix it? FreeBSD after all is mostly a volunteer operation. I and many others have offered to work on this. The core team has repeatedly stated that they won't integrate the efforts,

Anyone use any si(4) cards?

2005-12-22 Thread John Baldwin
Does anyone have any si(4) cards that they use? I'm curious because 1) I'd like to know if the si(4) driver works on HEAD, and 2) there is updated firmware for the SIJET cards I'd like someone to test. -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ Power Users Use the Power

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:35:34PM +0100, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote: I agree. And after all, tracking a security branch isn't too difficult, but the most people think that they have to do a complete make buildworld after a security advisory, but this isn't true. For example there was that

Re: FreeBSD Update is the binary update solution [Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006]

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:19:25PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the actual FreeBSD Security Officer. It's as official as it gets. If the only barrier to acceptance is that it's not distributed from the FreeBSD.org domain, then a)

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:10:19PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:08:07PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: So, when will you fix it? Or hire someone to fix it? FreeBSD after all is mostly a volunteer operation. I and many others have offered to work on this. The core team

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Chuck Swiger
Jo Rhett wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:55:03PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: YMMV. I burned a 6.0 release from the ISO image, and did a binary upgrade on an IBM ThinkPad (T.34? maybe), which worked perfectly. All of the 5.x binaries, including X11, KDE, printing, Mozilla, etc worked just

Re: cdboot troubles; 6.0 kernel hanging

2005-12-22 Thread Juergen Lock
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: I have this box that apparently no longer likes FreeBSD's cdboot, it prints something about BOOT/LOADER and then just reboots. Any ideas how to debug something like that? The box already has FreeBSD installed (5.3 with some

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:30:41PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: This statement makes no sense. The core team wouldn't have much to do with this other than possibly being involved in making any service official. Also, approval is never given to include a non-existent feature. Easy, binary

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Jo Rhett
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:45:09PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: FreeBSD releases new .ISO images several times a year, but you've got the tools to make .ISO images of patch releases yourself, if you want to. I don't think that the FreeBSD project can shorten the release cycle below a month

Re: gmirror SCSI+IDE

2005-12-22 Thread Martin Cracauer
Ivan Voras wrote on Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100: For some funny reasons, I'll probably have to setup a gmirror between a SCSI disk device and a IDE one, and won't have much time for testing. So I'm wondering did anyone do such a thing and are there any caveats. It is just

Re: FreeBSD Update is the binary update solution [Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006]

2005-12-22 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:47, Jo Rhett wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:19:25PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the actual FreeBSD Security Officer. It's as official as it gets. If the only barrier to acceptance is that it's not

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006 )

2005-12-22 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:42, Jo Rhett wrote: Using a build server as a testbed and to generate new packages or even a new kernel + world will reduce the amount of work required, but FreeBSD does require some level of administration and maintenance. We already have that. But again, I'm not

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2005-12-22 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:09:04PM -0800 I heard the voice of Jo Rhett, and lo! it spake thus: No, you're missing the point. More core OS upgrades means less incremental patches (which are easier to apply than a full update). Right. I don't understand how B follows A here. These patches

Re: gmirror SCSI+IDE

2005-12-22 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:23:48PM -0500 I heard the voice of Martin Cracauer, and lo! it spake thus: Ivan Voras wrote on Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100: For example, AFAIK SCSI devices are under Giant and IDE are not In 6.x and 7.x both are finer-graded. I wish somebody would

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-22 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Thu, 2005-Dec-22 13:10:19 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: I and many others have offered to work on this. The core team has repeatedly stated that they won't integrate the efforts, which makes os-upgrade capability minimal and easily broken. (see current efforts) On Thu, 2005-Dec-22 14:05:32 -0800, Jo

Re: i915drm

2005-12-22 Thread Gianmarco Giovannelli
At 08.10 22/12/2005, dawnshade wrote: On Thursday 22 December 2005 04:22, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: It seems to me that also Oliver has the same bug (0M) on his 915GM Any other with with centrino based 915 card can confirm this ? for me works fine: dmesg |grep -E 'drm|agp' agp0: Intel

Re: i915drm

2005-12-22 Thread Gianmarco Giovannelli
At 13.00 20/12/2005, dawnshade wrote: On Tuesday 20 December 2005 11:37, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: hp:/home/gmarco glxgears ERROR: line 125, Function intelInitDriver, File intel_screen.c libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. libGL error: InitDriver failed libGL error: reverting

Re: indefinite wait buffer: Does this indicate hardware issue?

2005-12-22 Thread Xin LI
Hi, On 19 Dec 2005 14:32:31 -0600, Douglas K. Rand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Tracing command swapper pid 0 tid 0 td 0xc0698e20 sched_switch(c0698e20,0,1) at sched_switch+0x14b mi_switch(1,0) at mi_switch+0x1ba scheduler(0,81ec00,81e000,0,c042f5d5) at scheduler+0x262 mi_startup() at

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
On 12/22/05, Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D D D D Server listening on TCP port 5001 D

Re: i915drm

2005-12-22 Thread dawnshade
On Friday 23 December 2005 08:11, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: At 08.10 22/12/2005, dawnshade wrote: On Thursday 22 December 2005 04:22, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: It seems to me that also Oliver has the same bug (0M) on his 915GM Any other with with centrino based 915 card can