I just upgraded 5.4 stable to 6.1 PRERELEASE via buildworld. I am trying to
build a kernel, and keep getting this error at make.
..
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=pentium4 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:27:56AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote:
I just upgraded 5.4 stable to 6.1 PRERELEASE via buildworld. I am trying to
build a kernel, and keep getting this error at make.
..
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=pentium4 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
O. Hartmann schrieb:
Roland Smith schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:22:14PM -0500, Stephan Koenig wrote:
Does anyone know of an easy way to get temperature information out of
a Dell PowerEdge 1550/1650/1750/1850/2650/2850 running FreeBSD4/5/6?
Something that has a very simple CLI that just
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:00 , the murky waters churned
and seethed, the dark weeds parted and the water took
on the sinister, shifting visage we recognize as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The great maw opened, and the
following was heard:
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:06:07 +0100
From: Andrzej
Hi,
my ifconfig -am command result is as follows;
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU
capabilities=5bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,POLLING
inet 10.0.10.114 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.0.10.115
On Mar 22, 2006, at 8:28 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
I think having a /usr/local/etc is new (past decade maybe),
We've had /usr/local on Sun boxes since I can remember (started using
SunOS 2.x back in college) and administering 4.2BSD (not FreeBSD 4.2,
but 4.2BSD from Berkeley) on
After a recent update, whenever I try to run the pkgdb (or any other command
that in turn calls pkgdb I get an error resulting in a core dump:
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 24 packages
found (-1 +2) (...).ruby18 in free(): error: chunk is already free
Abort (core
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 0:27:30 AM GMT-0800
Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:27:56AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote:
I
Matthew Jacob wrote:
working on it over the next month
Thank you for reply.
Can i help somehow with this issue?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Thursday 23 March 2006 11:11, Kaveh Ahmadian wrote:
After a recent update, whenever I try to run the pkgdb (or any other
command that in turn calls pkgdb I get an error resulting in a core dump:
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 24 packages
found (-1 +2)
:This doesn't work with modes like 446 (which allow writing by everyone
:not in a particular group).
It should work just fine. The client validated the creds as of the
original operation (such as the mmap() or the original write()).
Regardless of what happens after that, if the
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:41:50PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I may be getting a new Dell PE1850 soon, to replace our ancient CVS server
(still running 4-STABLE). The new machine will ideally run 6.0 and have a
PERC4e/DC RAID card - the one with battery-backed cache. This is
On recent releng_6 I have again nve timeouts and interface down status
Yesterday I found this thread
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2005-October/015351.html
and the change in if_nve.c resolved my problem
still having lots of collisions coming from this NIC but it stays up and
середа 22 березень 2006 15:20, Matthew Dillon Ви написали:
The only real solution is to make the NFS client aware of the
restricted user id exported by the server by requiring that the
same uid be specified in the mount command the client uses to
mount the NFS partition. The
вівторок 21 березень 2006 20:09, Matthew Dillon Ви написали:
'vmstat 1' while the program is running would tell us if VM faults
are creating an issue.
This problem -- vmstat and `systat -vm' occasionally stalling the entire
system -- did not go away, it just became less frequent and
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:25:35AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 0:27:30 AM GMT-0800
Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error
I am a bit confused. The first addition of sc-pending_txs = 0; was
MFC'ed back in December by obrien.
Check around line 730 of if_nv.c (or whatever it's called in 6.0)
sc-linkup = 0;
sc-cur_rx = 0;
sc-pending_rxs = 0;
+ sc-pending_txs = 0;
This should mostly
I have a similar crash from
6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #1: Sun Mar 19 13:28:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 09:01:05PM -0600, Vlad wrote:
i
Ok, thanks for Joe's hint I was able to get stuff captured:
# kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0
...
#9 0x8037ee2b in calltrap () at
I updated my system on 22 March with sources available on the mirrors at
11:30 PST and ended up with a system that wouldn't boot. It would get
to the point that I chose FreeBSD using ntldr and it just stopped.
The XP sytem used an older boot1 to boot FreeBSD. I could use the
6.0-Release CD
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:57:17PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
On to my next question about running 6.0 on a Dell PE1850, since it seems
that the RAID card will work just fine...
I'm thinking about getting the machine with a DRAC4 remote management card.
This looks to be
For us poor saps in Indiana... could we get a new zoneinfo port
prior to 5.5-R?
thanks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:29, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I am a bit confused. The first addition of sc-pending_txs = 0; was
MFC'ed back in December by obrien.
Check around line 730 of if_nv.c (or whatever it's called in 6.0)
sc-linkup = 0;
sc-cur_rx = 0;
sc-pending_rxs
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:20:02 AM GMT-0800
Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:24:04AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
From: Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:24:04 -0500
To: freebsd-stable freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.3)
Subject: Re: a place for configuration files
On Mar 22, 2006, at 8:28 PM,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:43:59AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:20:02 AM GMT-0800
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote:
Hi,
The other patch cited in the message has never been made:
diff -u -r1.7.2.4 if_nve.c
--- if_nve.c9 Oct 2005 04:18:17 - 1.7.2.4
+++ if_nve.c27 Oct 2005 09:58:45 -
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@
DEBUGOUT(NVE_DEBUG_INIT, nve:
вівторок 21 березень 2006 17:48, Matthew Dillon Ви написали:
Reading via mmap() is very well optimized.
Actually, I can not agree here -- quite the opposite seems true. When running
locally (no NFS involved) my compressor with the `-1' flag (fast, least
effective compression), the program
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:48:29 AM GMT-0800
Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Ames writes:
For us poor saps in Indiana... could we get a new zoneinfo port
prior to 5.5-R?
Sorry, I've been unable to devote any attention at all to FreeBSD in
the past three months or so. I'm hoping to clear the backlog soon,
but I don't think that I'll be able to
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
If you have collisions you have most likeely a duplex mismatch.
yep, but I set manually matching with the switch and tried other speeds, no
change
If you read the code and I remember right the above change is a NOP.
anyway, resolved
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:58:04PM +0200, husnu demir wrote:
Hi,
my ifconfig -am command result is as follows;
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU
capabilities=5bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,POLLING
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:17:55AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I have already performed the
entire procedure specified in updating. The system is running the
new 6.1 binaries/kernel.
After booting into the new environment, I removed /usr/obj.
At
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:57:11 AM GMT-0800
Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at
:Actually, I can not agree here -- quite the opposite seems true. When running
:locally (no NFS involved) my compressor with the `-1' flag (fast, least
:effective compression), the program easily compresses faster, than it can
:read.
:
:The Opteron CPU is about 50% idle, *and so is the disk*
четвер 23 березень 2006 15:48, Matthew Dillon Ви написали:
Well, I don't know about FreeBSD, but both grep cases work just fine on
DragonFly.
Yes, they both do work fine, but time gives very different stats for each. In
my experiments, the total CPU time is noticably less with mmap,
On Thursday 23 March 2006 11:53, John Nielsen wrote:
I've seen this a number of times; it usually means a corrupt pkgdb. Rebuild
it from scratch (pkgdb -fu). If that fails or if you still get the error
afterwards, rebuild and reinstall portupgrade and ruby (without using
portupgrade in the
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case (for
me) in end of dezember
since a month or so with recent releng_6 the problem came back, timeouts and
stopping rx/tx
did you
O. Hartmann wrote:
O. Hartmann schrieb:
Roland Smith schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:22:14PM -0500, Stephan Koenig wrote:
Does anyone know of an easy way to get temperature information out of
a Dell PowerEdge 1550/1650/1750/1850/2650/2850 running FreeBSD4/5/6?
Something that has a
On Thursday 23 March 2006 18:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case
(for me) in end of dezember
since a month or so with recent
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:59:56 + (UTC)
From: Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case
(for
me) in end of dezember
:Yes, they both do work fine, but time gives very different stats for each. In
:my experiments, the total CPU time is noticably less with mmap, but the
:elapsed time is (much) greater. Here are results from FreeBSD-6.1/amd64 --
:notice the large number of page faults, because the system does
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:16:11PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
In anycase, this sort of test is not really a good poster child for how
to use mmap(). Nobody in their right mind uses mmap() on datasets that
they expect to be uncacheable and which are accessed sequentially. It's
: time fgrep meowmeowmeow /home/oh.0.dump
: 2.167u 7.739s 1:25.21 11.6% 70+3701k 23663+0io 6pf+0w
: time fgrep --mmap meowmeowmeow /home/oh.0.dump
: 1.552u 7.109s 2:46.03 5.2% 18+1031k 156+0io 106327pf+0w
:
:Use a big enough file to bust the memory caching
:I thought one serious advantage to this situation for sequential read
:mmap() is to madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) so that the pages don't have to
:wait for the clock hands to reap them. On a large Solaris box I used
:to have the non-pleasure of running the VM page scan rate was high, and
:I suggested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
According to www.hp.com nx6110 has a synaptics touchpad. I have tried
with an Ubuntu Live CD and detected correctly:
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
Synaptic Touchpad, model: 1
Firmware: 6.2
Sensor: 37
new absolute packet format
All,
Two days ago I reported a panic here
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023748.html)
on a freshly cvsuped releng_6 generic kernel. I have heard no
responses at all - does this mean I am posting in the wrong place, or
does no one care about 6.1?
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:22:37PM -0500, Surer Dink wrote:
Two days ago I reported a panic here
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023748.html)
on a freshly cvsuped releng_6 generic kernel. I have heard no
responses at all - does this mean I am posting in the wrong
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:39:56 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:22:37PM -0500, Surer Dink wrote:
Two days ago I reported a panic here
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023748.html)
on a freshly cvsuped releng_6 generic
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:31:05PM +0800, James Gallagher wrote:
I also wonder if this would be better reported on -current rather than
-stable as the concerned version, 6.1, is pre-release/Beta?
Nope, that's not the way it works. -stable is for 4.X/5.X/6.X. -current
is for -HEAD, e.g., that
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:22:37PM -0500, Surer Dink wrote:
All,
Two days ago I reported a panic here
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023748.html)
on a freshly cvsuped releng_6 generic kernel. I have heard no
responses at all - does this mean I am posting in
Hi
After my previous email about the SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE timeout
on (msgid [EMAIL PROTECTED] , 17 March 14:18 GMT + 2 on
freebsd-stable), I installed FreeBSD 6.1 BETA 4 and upgraded to a
6-STABLE kernel, running the box in 'safe' mode to do so. I now,
however, get a slightly
51 matches
Mail list logo
