Phil Kernick wrote:
Looking through the stable archives this was reported last year but there
does not seem to be any resolution of the problem.
Yea. I had this problem, too. My controller was an old Highpoint ATA 66.
Since noone could help, I moved directly to 6.x branch. That solved my
Quoting Iantcho Vassilev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My vote goes to PureFtpd..
It`s ideal server..
But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd.
On 5/4/06, N.J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Noah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-04 05:48:40 -0800]:
What are people using for their ftpd these days? I
Hi List,
After a motherboard failure in a machine, I purchased a cheap AXPER
motherboard to replace it. The machine is a Socket478 P4 with a Via
Rhine onboard NIC.
I've read/heard a lot to say don't use vr cards, they suck kind of
talk - but wanted to go through the official channels to
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0300, Matti J. Karki wrote:
On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the
copy is not equal to te source file.
Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Iantcho Vassilev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My vote goes to PureFtpd..
It`s ideal server..
But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd.
Hi,
I'm curious - do you have any empirical evidence to support this?
A trawl of a few vulnerabilty databases would suggest your comment is
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines
together.
This has all been running fine up till a
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert
code paths.
It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of bzero()/NULL'ing out of
memory, which
On 5/14/06, Matti J. Karki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0300, Matti J. Karki wrote:
On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem
On Sun, 14 May 2006 11:29:21 +0100
Jase Thew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious - do you have any empirical evidence to support this?
'scuse me, boys, could you please take this off the freebsd-stable
list?
The discussion has wandered off-topic for this list...
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines
together.
This has all been
Using 6.1-STABLE cvsup'd on 5/9, I am noticing that on insertion
of a wi0 card, dhclient is invoking its dhclient-script several
times, as follows, from instrumentation added to the script:
Sun May 14 18:34:20 EDT 2006 dhclient reason=PREINIT
Sun May 14 18:34:20 EDT 2006 dhclient reason=REBOOT
Are you running rpc.lockd? I've had very bad luck with it since
sometime in the 5.x series... especially with it interoperating with
Solaris. I submitted a PR on it, but it's apparently broken in about X
ways. If possible, I would suggest living without rpc.lockd for now (if
you're
On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400
m m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am writing in regard to PR at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am
experiencing behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11:
Sun Mar 26 00:03:52 EST 2006 which looks a lot like something
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:48:16PM -0400, J.R. Oldroyd wrote:
Using 6.1-STABLE cvsup'd on 5/9, I am noticing that on insertion
of a wi0 card, dhclient is invoking its dhclient-script several
times, as follows, from instrumentation added to the script:
Sun May 14 18:34:20 EDT 2006 dhclient
Dear all,
I will jump straight to the question. Is there something like SE Linux in
FreeBSD which enforces Mandatory Access Control (MAC) on processes ?
Thank you in advance.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Low Kian Seong wrote:
Dear all,
I will jump straight to the question. Is there something like SE Linux in
FreeBSD which enforces Mandatory Access Control (MAC) on processes ?
Try here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mac.html
Thank you in advance.
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and
Would this just be lockd, or should I disable both lockd and statd? I notice
in the rc.conf it claims they are both supposed to be enabled, so not sure
what issues I run into if I disable them, if any.
As to my servers, I have a bunch of stuff running actually. The Dual XEON
server being my
Mon, 15 May 2006 10:26:33 +0800
Low Kian Seong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Вы писали:
Dear all,
I will jump straight to the question. Is there something like SE
Linux in FreeBSD which enforces Mandatory Access Control (MAC) on
processes ?
There is a project called TrustedBSD. File system
Howard Leadmon wrote:
Would this just be lockd, or should I disable both lockd and statd? I notice
in the rc.conf it claims they are both supposed to be enabled, so not sure
what issues I run into if I disable them, if any.
No need to disable rpc.statd though I don't know if any other
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
Pyun,
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote..
On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
and sparc64(SMP) and I never see
21 matches
Mail list logo
