Once in a while my web-server running a fairly recent amd64-STABLE
reboots, after a panic.
I have the vmcore.[789] of the last three panics, but the backtraces say
little to me; can some help interpret them? what's going on?
% uname -a
FreeBSD motoko.lapo.it 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #7: Fri
Ted Hatfield wrote:
Using less -E or more to display a file that is less than a full page,
while then displaying a nonexistent file causes a segmentation fault.
For example on a newly built system you can
less -E /etc/group bogusfile
This will display the file ending with
/etc/group
Graham Menhennitt wrote:
Ted Hatfield wrote:
Using less -E or more to display a file that is less than a full page,
while then displaying a nonexistent file causes a segmentation fault.
For example on a newly built system you can
less -E /etc/group bogusfile
This will display the file
Hi
I have problems with a combination of
Mainboard: Intel Serverboard SE7221BK1-E, ICH 6 Chipset, Bios Version P06
HDD: WD 4000YR, no raid
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE-200702
(boot messages see further down)
From time to time (every 2-4 weeks) the server hangs without any message on
the console or in
Doug Barton wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
However, I noticed that the refresh interval of the root zone is
1800, i.e. it would be fetched every 30 minutes,
No, refresh is how often the master servers are checked for serial
number changes.
True, I forgot about that. Thanks for
ok, thanks. I have made that change and now I've gotten this
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c: In function `ffs_mountfs':
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:675: error: structure has no member named
`mnt_gjprovider'
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:677: error: structure has no member named
On Friday 03 August 2007, Xin LI wrote:
Graham Menhennitt wrote:
Ted Hatfield wrote:
Using less -E or more to display a file that is less than a full page,
while then displaying a nonexistent file causes a segmentation fault.
For example on a newly built system you can
less -E
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
I hope that we can now dial down the volume on the meta-issue of how
the change was done, and focus on the operational issues of whether
it's a good idea or not.
Which has been answered to you, repeatedly, by the very people who
know this best.
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
*snip*
There's also another regression in less: it doesn't automatically
repaint the screen anymore when you resize the terminal.
I have already reported that regression to Mark Nudelman. He is looking
into an appropriate fix since this regression
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
*snip*
There's also another regression in less: it doesn't automatically
repaint the screen anymore when you resize the terminal.
I have already reported that regression to Mark Nudelman. He is
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:29:57 +0200
Pieter de Goeje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also another regression in less: it doesn't automatically
repaint the screen anymore when you resize the terminal.
Regards,
Pieter de Goeje
It most
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:29:57 +0200
Pieter de Goeje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also another regression in less: it doesn't automatically
repaint the screen anymore when you resize the terminal.
Regards,
Pieter de Goeje
It most certainly does here.
--
Alexander Kabaev
signature.asc
On Aug 3, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm getting tired of repeating this. A lot of really smart people
are lined up on BOTH sides of this issue. You might want to take
another look at the threads about this on the OARC list (or even
this list for that matter) and try to have an
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
I hope that we can now dial down the volume on the meta-issue of how
the change was done, and focus on the operational issues of whether
it's a good idea or not.
Which has been answered to you, repeatedly, by
On Aug 3, 2007, at 6:12 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
I would appreciate it if the personal attacks ceased.
There was no personal attack there. I never called him names or made
any remark about his lifestyle or anything else. I did say that he
isn't paying attention to the people
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Aug 3, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm getting tired of repeating this. A lot of really smart people are
lined up on BOTH sides of this issue. You might want to take another
look at the threads about this on the OARC list (or even this list for
that matter) and try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, July 31, 2007 14:47:50 -0700 Kris Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not sure all the tests run properly since I didn't run through them
yet. I'll try it out tomorrow morning though. All I tried was FireFox
for Windows and
17 matches
Mail list logo
