Re: em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Goran Lowkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, After the update of em to 6.6.6 last, I experience watchdog timeouts on a server running 6-STABLE. I have two identical servers with Intel D915GAV boards. Both have Intel PRO/1000 PCI-Express network cards. Server balder: em0: port 0xac00-0xac1f mem 0xff60-

Re: em lockups during heavy network I/O on RELENG_7

2007-10-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 12:10:30AM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote: > > There's another thread on this issue, although that thread seems to > > apply to a specific version (of em(4) code, or of NIC PROM revision -- I > > don't know, the dmesg output is somewhat ambiguous). > > Ah sorry, I did see that t

Re: em lockups during heavy network I/O on RELENG_7

2007-10-19 Thread Josh Carroll
> There's another thread on this issue, although that thread seems to > apply to a specific version (of em(4) code, or of NIC PROM revision -- I > don't know, the dmesg output is somewhat ambiguous). Ah sorry, I did see that thread, but did notice the em version was different, and that it didn't a

Re: em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Philip Murray
On 20/10/2007, at 5:03 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:21:10AM +1300, Philip Murray wrote: "me too" on a Supermicro 5015MT+, although I notice my em0 is also sharing an interrupt with USB (uhci3)... not sure if that's the culprit. I'm not aware of a 5015MT+ model. Ma

Re: em lockups during heavy network I/O on RELENG_7

2007-10-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:24:44PM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote: > Sorry, I should have also included dmesg output. The "not properly > dismounted" errors are obviously from the last crash :) There's another thread on this issue, although that thread seems to apply to a specific version (of em(4) cod

Re: em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:21:10AM +1300, Philip Murray wrote: > "me too" on a Supermicro 5015MT+, although I notice my em0 is also sharing > an interrupt with USB (uhci3)... not sure if that's the culprit. I'm not aware of a 5015MT+ model. Maybe you mean 5015M-MT+ or 5015M-T+? We have two 5015

Re: em lockups during heavy network I/O on RELENG_7

2007-10-19 Thread Josh Carroll
Sorry, I should have also included dmesg output. The "not properly dismounted" errors are obviously from the last crash :) Here is /var/run/dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the

em lockups during heavy network I/O on RELENG_7

2007-10-19 Thread Josh Carroll
Hello, I have managed to lock my (amd64, RELENG_7) machine up twice today. In both cases, I was transferring a file to my laptop (in one case over SMB, the other over FTP). Both resulted in a hard lock (no panic). One of the lockups had an "em1: watchdog timeout" message on the console, the other

Re: em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Jack Vogel
OK, I will look into this as soon as I can. Jack On 10/19/07, Philip Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 20/10/2007, at 1:06 AM, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > After the update of em to 6.6.6 last, I experience watchdog timeouts > > on a server running 6-STABLE. > > > > "me too" o

LOCK_PROFILING in -stable

2007-10-19 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on FreeBSD-6, this means I can relatively easily backport LOCK_PROFILING from FreeBSD-7 to FreeBSD-6. Do we want this? I'd like to do it if people want it. -- - Alfred Perlstein ___ freebsd-sta

Re: em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Philip Murray
On 20/10/2007, at 1:06 AM, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: Hi, After the update of em to 6.6.6 last, I experience watchdog timeouts on a server running 6-STABLE. "me too" on a Supermicro 5015MT+, although I notice my em0 is also sharing an interrupt with USB (uhci3)... not sure if that's the cu

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state under persistent CPU load

2007-10-19 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Oleg Derevenetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071019 08:17] wrote: > Hi all, > > Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang situation, > but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from > here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developer

Re: rpc.statd--256M okay, but 1G?

2007-10-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:07:02PM -0700, Christopher Chen wrote: > Is there a simple and easy reason why rpc.statd would mmap 1G? I've > read the FAQ and understand why it would allocate 256M, but this one > shows 1G--file.c in /usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.statd is still set to > allocate 256M, btw. > >

Re: kldxref: file isn't dynamically-linked -- expected behaviour?

2007-10-19 Thread Ruben van Staveren
On 19 Oct 2007, at 8:04, Chris Chou wrote: I saw the same message when upgrading from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7, and it disappeared when I re-installed the RELENG_7 kernel. Was your user land already upgraded to RELENG_7 ? if concerned, find the version 7 kldxref from /usr/obj and rerun it. ap

kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in "ufs" state under persistent CPU load

2007-10-19 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
Hi all, Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang situation, but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html After my break to debugger using C

Re: kldxref: file isn't dynamically-linked -- expected behaviour?

2007-10-19 Thread Philipp Ost
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:06:55PM +0200, Philipp Ost wrote: Vlad GALU wrote: On 10/18/07, Philipp Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi list, I'm currently upgrading from 6.2-STABLE (13 Oct. 2007) to RELENG_7. I did the following after csup'ing my sources: # make kernel-

Re: Supermicro X7DBR-8+ hang at boot

2007-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 01:17:57 pm Guy Helmer wrote: > Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 1/23/07, Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Using FreeBSD 6.2, I'm having trouble with the Supermicro X7DBR-8+ > >> motherboard (dual Xeon 5130 CPUs on the Blackford chipset - > >> http://www.supermicro.com/

Re: kldxref: file isn't dynamically-linked -- expected behaviour?

2007-10-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:06:55PM +0200, Philipp Ost wrote: > Vlad GALU wrote: >> On 10/18/07, Philipp Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I'm currently upgrading from 6.2-STABLE (13 Oct. 2007) to RELENG_7. I >>> did the following after csup'ing my sources: >>> # make kernel-toolc

Re: em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Goran Lowkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, snip When running netstat between servers balder and midgard, server balder get watchdog timeouts and resets the connection for a few seconds. Oct 19 13:12:47 balder kernel: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting s/netstat/netperf/ ...

Re: libpcap/tcpdump update

2007-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-10-19 10:48, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and > RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well, > because I don't have the resources available at the moment. The > update was crucial to me in HEAD a

em 6.6.6 - watchdog timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Goran Lowkrantz
Hi, After the update of em to 6.6.6 last, I experience watchdog timeouts on a server running 6-STABLE. I have two identical servers with Intel D915GAV boards. Both have Intel PRO/1000 PCI-Express network cards. Server balder: em0: port 0xac00-0xac1f mem 0xff60-0xff61,0xff62-0x

Re: [Mimedefang] Re: Mimedefang crashes on FreeBSD 6 STABLE, amd64

2007-10-19 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Looks like I found the problem and it was a local patch - ouch. Some casts that worked in i386 didn't work on amd64 ... sigh. Sorry for the noise. -- Martin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: Mimedefang crashes on FreeBSD 6 STABLE, amd64

2007-10-19 Thread Martin Blapp
A kdump output shows always the same output. The file descriptor '108/0x6c' doesn't look very valid -- 36626 mimedefang RET kse_release 0 36626 mimedefang RET kse_release 0 36626 mime

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-10-19 Thread Remy Nonnenmacher
Josh Carroll wrote: I have noticed some performance discrepancies with ULE and 4BSD in RELENG_7, specifically with ffmpeg. I have all the kernel debugging options disabled, and as I understand it, the userland debugging is all off by default in RELENG_7. Here are a couple of additional benchmar

Re: Mounting smbfs as user?

2007-10-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 18/10/2007 17:29 Ivan Voras said the following: > Krassimir Slavchev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ivan Voras wrote: > > >>> The same command works under root, and the appropriate klds are loaded: >> Only superuser can load modules. If you try to load module by regular >> user you will get: kldload: can

Re: libpcap/tcpdump update

2007-10-19 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi Max, On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:48:52AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and > RELENG_7. Thank you for updating these two components! Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgp2pFfzwjHEk.pgp Description: PGP sig

Re: libpcap/tcpdump update

2007-10-19 Thread Max Laier
Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well, because I don't have the resources available at the moment. The update was crucial to me in HEAD and RELENG_7 to get a working pflog tcpdump, but RELENG_6 isn't

Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7

2007-10-19 Thread Chris H.
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Clifton Royston wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:01:46PM -0700, Chris H. wrote: excerpt from this list titled: NFS == lock && reboot, that I posted follows: --8<---SNIP---8<-SNIP-8<--- # uname -a FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE

Mimedefang crashes on FreeBSD 6 STABLE, amd64

2007-10-19 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi everybody, I'm trying to get mimedefang running on amd64. But unfortunatly the threaded milter part ('mimedefang') does segfault after some time, normally 1-2 minutes. pid 2331 (mimedefang), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) gdb /idms/bin/mimedefang mimedefang-2331.core #0 0x